~NOiSE~ Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 This was a topic about Dark Armed Dragon, but no longer. Please lock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 I'm not even going to have this discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 Oh look, its this topic again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~NOiSE~ Posted November 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 [quote name='slayer_supreme' timestamp='1289788491' post='4786041'] I'm not even going to have this discussion. [/quote] I know the answer, I just want to know what people say. Hostility sure seems to rise when this card is mentioned...[quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1289788625' post='4786045'] Oh look, its this topic again [/quote] This card is posted frequently? I wouldn't have if I'd known that. Then again, I really shouldn't be surprised... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 Not only is it brought up often, but opinions are pretty simple: The card is broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~NOiSE~ Posted November 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 [quote name='slayer_supreme' timestamp='1289788491' post='4786041'] I'm not even going to have this discussion. [/quote] Well, that was a mistake I'm never making again. How do I lock this topic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T. Sankara Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 Difficult summoning requirements? I've obviously been out of the game for FAR too long. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbu-of-Sand Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 [quote name='Jester Head' timestamp='1289788973' post='4786057'] Well, that was a mistake I'm never making again. How do I lock this topic? [/quote] Tell / Ask a mod to lock it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 It wasn't hostility toward you, or anything really. I just don't like this card. When it first came out I admit I made a deck for it (online), but that's because I didn't realize that you could make it really easy to bring it out. And then once it does come out, it's just too devastating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~NOiSE~ Posted November 15, 2010 Author Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 [quote name='slayer_supreme' timestamp='1289789293' post='4786072'] It wasn't hostility toward you, or anything really. I just don't like this card. When it first came out I admit I made a deck for it (online), but that's because I didn't realize that you could make it really easy to bring it out. And then once it does come out, it's just too devastating. [/quote] It's all good. I had one in my dragon deck for awhile, but I actually took it out because I wasn't able to summon it easily. My deck didn't have too many ways of manipulating cards in the graveyard, so it wasn't too useful. Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon is much more fun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Rrey Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 Pretty awesome card nuff' said! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 [quote name='Jester Head' timestamp='1289788444' post='4786037'] [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Dark_Armed_Dragon"]Dark Armed Dragon[/url] I actually love this card, but does it's fairly difficult summoning condition balance it? Blowing away three of your opponent's cards right off the bat seems a bit cruel. Discuss. [/quote] Sigg'ed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmic Destroyer of Tea Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 Never post a topic about Dark Armed Dragon again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted November 15, 2010 Report Share Posted November 15, 2010 If I said it once, I will say it again: Dark Armed Dragon used to be amazing when it was @3. Now, it's only true use is in BW, SalvoDAD and AvengerDAD. Warning mows over it. [s]Bongo Bongo>>>>>>>DAD[/s] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zkaiser Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 My facedown is always Blast With Chain or Book of Moon. I always lol @ DAD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 NOTE: i do not want to discuss another topic about dark armed dragon, it's getting quite boring now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 What if their facedown is [size="7"][b]S-[/b][/size] *gets shot* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 It's easy to get out, has a ridiculously powerful effect and is a free beatstick. Broken and terrible for the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 [quote name='$super**$star**$silver$' timestamp='1289899077' post='4788778'] NOTE: i do not want to discuss another topic about dark armed dragon, it's getting quite boring now [/quote] [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1289927579' post='4789172'] What if their facedown is [size="7"][b]S-[/b][/size]*gets shot* [/quote] Might I suggest a rule against discussing re-discussed cards over and over and over again? Something like this we [s]should[/s] know its broken, we know it had its own meta. Until it gets a list change (it should stay at 1) we should not be discussing such a card. [/hypocrisy] No offense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 [quote name='TheTurtleOnceCalledGod' timestamp='1289927890' post='4789182'] Might I suggest a rule against discussing re-discussed cards over and over and over again? Something like this we [s]should[/s] know its broken, we know it had its own meta. Until it gets a list change (it should stay at 1) we should not be discussing such a card. [/hypocrisy] No offense [/quote] None taken, i'm getting sick of seeing dark armed dragon topics too. With your first point i agree with you there, because this is like the 3rd or 4th time (i think) i have seen dark armed dragon topics within a few months Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 [quote name='TheTurtleOnceCalledGod' timestamp='1289927890' post='4789182'] Might I suggest a rule against discussing re-discussed cards over and over and over again? Something like this we [s]should[/s] know its broken, we know it had its own meta. Until it gets a list change (it should stay at 1) we should not be discussing such a card. [/hypocrisy] [/quote] There's no rule against it, because we may still once in a while get idiots who think it's not broken (like the topic creator) or idiots who think it should stay at 1 (like you). So, why should this card be at one as opposed to zero? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 It shouldn't be @ 1 any more than JD should be allowed @ 2. I can't remember ever seeing DAD used by opponet that didn't have me realizing I was screwed, even if I held off the dragon for one turn. It can kill virtually anything in battle, can nuke any card for a minimal amount of effort, can refuel the Grave using Burial (both Foolish and interdimensional varients) and even late game, PoC can take it from the grave and nuke everything in sight because by that time, your grave is nice and full. The earlier in the game you draw into this, the more powerful it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 [quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1289928222' post='4789194'] There's no rule against it, because we may still once in a while get idiots who think it's not broken (like the topic creator) or idiots who think it should stay at 1 (like you).So, why should this card be at one as opposed to zero? [/quote] If Zero ended up limited or even semi-limited, hero decks would die fast. It makes some water-using decks competitive. In best case scenarios, they would put [i]both[/i] to one, and perhaps miracle fusion to 2 or even 1 just to drive the nail in the coffin, and even future fusion to 0 to pretty much burn them with fire again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 [quote name='TheTurtleOnceCalledGod' timestamp='1289937332' post='4789382'] If Zero ended up limited or even semi-limited, hero decks would die fast. It makes some water-using decks competitive. In best case scenarios, they would put [i]both[/i] to one, and perhaps miracle fusion to 2 or even 1 just to drive the nail in the coffin, and even future fusion to 0 to pretty much burn them with fire again. [/quote] ... I didn't mean Absolute Zero. I mean, why should Dark Armed Dragon be at one (limited) as opposed to zero (as in, forbidden). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeezus Posted November 16, 2010 Report Share Posted November 16, 2010 It should be banned and you're an idiot if you don't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.