Jord200 Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Blizzard_Princess You can Tribute Summon this card by Tributing 1 Spellcaster-Type monster you control. During the turn this card is Normal Summoned, your opponent cannot activate Spell or Trap Cards. [IMG]http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/deena666_album/cirno-2.jpg[/IMG] lol Touhou. disc card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superdoopertrooper Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 It's actually not too bad. A mini cold wave for your opponent when normal summoned, so it's not just restricted to tribute summon. Which means you can use mausoleum etc to get it out and effect will still work. Trade in works with it too if if sitting dead in your hand. You could almost make a deck around this. The art is nice too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bringerofcake Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 Level 8, Spellcaster, WATER. Enough said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wahrheit Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 [quote name='A Veritable Truth' timestamp='1298355521' post='5025697'] Level 8, Spellcaster, WATER. Enough said. [/quote] Rather no. You imply the card is bad for these reasons but fail to acknowledge those stated above. Additionally, with Cold Wave gone, this is about as close as you get outside of Trap Stun. I would be intrigued to see a deck involving this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 [quote name='Wahrheit' timestamp='1298356530' post='5025721'] Rather no. You imply the card is bad for these reasons but fail to acknowledge those stated above. Additionally, with Cold Wave gone, this is about as close as you get outside of Trap Stun. I would be intrigued to see a deck involving this. [/quote] No Wahr He's saying that the card is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bringerofcake Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 [quote name='Wahrheit' timestamp='1298356530' post='5025721'] Rather no. You imply the card is bad [/quote] EDIT: Azuh said it, but I'm elaborating. You're kidding, right? This card is really good for the above stated reasons: Level 8: Trade-In support WATER: Moray of Greed support Spellcaster: Gains the benefit of the type, specifically of Magical Exemplar and Hidden Village. This is a draw engine that can be used with this and Ice Queen, (and actually, I should work on the draw engine, as a third 'caster is necessary) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Rrey Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 The best Spellcaster monster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 [quote name='Dark Marquis Belial' timestamp='1298368111' post='5025933'] The best WATER Spellcaster monster? [/quote] Dark Magician of Chaos Still exists.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wahrheit Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 [quote name='A Veritable Truth' timestamp='1298356896' post='5025736'] EDIT: Azuh said it, but I'm elaborating. You're kidding, right? This card is really good for the above stated reasons: Level 8: Trade-In support WATER: Moray of Greed support Spellcaster: Gains the benefit of the type, specifically of Magical Exemplar and Hidden Village. This is a draw engine that can be used with this and Ice Queen, (and actually, I should work on the draw engine, as a third 'caster is necessary) [/quote] Then you should elaborate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 Needs to be in the TCG....NAO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brinolovania Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 I could just sit here for 30 minutes, staring at the art... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 The art looks so stupid...But averageish card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 [quote name='Shard Of Stardust' timestamp='1298386963' post='5026312'] [b]The art looks so stupid[/b]...But averageish card. [/quote] [img]http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/6/9/shundanonbeli128575256094206586.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solemn Silver Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 Do want? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted February 23, 2011 Report Share Posted February 23, 2011 [quote name='-Dae-' timestamp='1298387379' post='5026330'] [img]http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/6/9/shundanonbeli128575256094206586.jpg[/img] [/quote] [img]http://checkmybelly.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/lolcat-funny-picture-moderator1.jpg[/img] Its one of the bests tribute spellcasters that isn't banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted February 23, 2011 Report Share Posted February 23, 2011 Some of these rulings listed in the wiki make no sense at all. It states that Blizzard Princess' effect is Continuous, but with the way the rest of the rulings are, it seems to imply Blizzard Princess is a Trigger Effect =/ If her effect is Continuous, then: 1: If Blizzard Princess was negated by Skill Drain at the time it was Normal Summoned successfully, even if Skill Drain is removed from the field during the same turn, Blizzard Princess' Continuous Effect should be reapplied, which the wiki suggested otherwise. 2: It wouldn't matter who Normal Summoned Blizzard Princess, its the opponent of who controls Blizzard Princess that cannot activate Spell/Trap cards, though the Wiki claims otherwise. 3: If Blizzard Princess was removed from the field, then its Continuous Effect can no longer be applied, though the wiki is continuous until the End of the Turn even if she's no longer there. Something about the Japanese rulings seem incredibly off. Her effect would either have to be a Trigger Effect, or the other three rulings would be wrong. Assuming they're all correct in the JP, then I don't understand why she's ruled like that. It boggles my mind :< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted February 23, 2011 Report Share Posted February 23, 2011 [quote name='darkwolf777' timestamp='1298482093' post='5029115'] Some of these rulings listed in the wiki make no sense at all. It states that Blizzard Princess' effect is Continuous, but with the way the rest of the rulings are, it seems to imply Blizzard Princess is a Trigger Effect =/ If her effect is Continuous, then: 1: If Blizzard Princess was negated by Skill Drain at the time it was Normal Summoned successfully, even if Skill Drain is removed from the field during the same turn, Blizzard Princess' Continuous Effect should be reapplied, which the wiki suggested otherwise. 2: It wouldn't matter who Normal Summoned Blizzard Princess, its the opponent of who controls Blizzard Princess that cannot activate Spell/Trap cards, though the Wiki claims otherwise. 3: If Blizzard Princess was removed from the field, then its Continuous Effect can no longer be applied, though the wiki is continuous until the End of the Turn even if she's no longer there. Something about the Japanese rulings seem incredibly off. Her effect would either have to be a Trigger Effect, or the other three rulings would be wrong. Assuming they're all correct in the JP, then I don't understand why she's ruled like that. It boggles my mind :< [/quote] It's like if it's effect was the Lingering kind... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted February 23, 2011 Report Share Posted February 23, 2011 [quote name='Saikano' timestamp='1298485679' post='5029220'] It's like if it's effect was the Lingering kind... [/quote] Yes, that what it would mean when it is being ruled as being a Trigger Effect that activated and resolved successfully. This would mean When Blizzard Princess is Normal Summon, its effect activates. If it resolves successfully, then for the rest of the turn, the opponent of the one who activated Blizzard Princess (the one who Normal Summoned Blizzard Princess) cannot activate Spell/Trap Cards for the rest of the turn, regardless of whether Blizzard Princess stays on the field or control is shifted. If it were a Trigger Effect and it was negated when it resolved, then yes, if Skill Drain was later removed, then the effect doesn't return. Basically, the wording on the card (During the turn this card is Normal Summoned) and first rule states "This effect does not start a chain", making it a Continuous Effect. The rest of the rulings only make sense if Blizzard Princess was a Trigger Effect. That's what's confusing Dx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.