Resident Fascist Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20080607024332/yugioh/images/thumb/2/25/ChimeratechOverdragonGLD1-EN-GUR-LE.png/300px-ChimeratechOverdragonGLD1-EN-GUR-LE.png[/img][img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090814024536/yugioh/images/thumb/0/0c/ChimeratechFortressDragonJUMP-EN-UR-LE.png/300px-ChimeratechFortressDragonJUMP-EN-UR-LE.png[/img] Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 here are the Lores of both cards Fortress: "Cyber Dragon + 1 or more Machine-Type monsters." This monster cannot be used as a Fusion Material Monster. You can only Special Summon this card from your Extra Deck by sending the above cards from either side of the field to the Graveyard. (You do not use "Polymerization".) The original ATK of this card is equal to 1000 x the number of Fusion Material Monsters used to Special Summon it. Overdragon: "Cyber Dragon" + 1 or more Machine-Type monsters." This monster cannot be Special Summoned except by Fusion Summon. When this card is Fusion Summoned, send all other cards you control to the Graveyard. The original ATK and DEF of this card are each 800 x the number of Fusion Material Monsters used for its Fusion Summon. Each turn, this card can attack as many of your opponent's monsters as the number of Fusion Material Monsters used for its Fusion Summon. also the alignment hurts my eyes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted March 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 Fixed. Am I the only one that noticed you can OTK with Overdragon with using just 6 Monsters dealing 10,800 Damage if you clear the entire field for a direct attack? Also inB4 Quote: In a ideal world, these would be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiithepeople Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 Fortress is slightly better than Overdragon simply because of more ATK potential This is why I ALWAYS run 3 Machine Dupe. Well, this and Morphtronic Lighton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EHN. Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [quote name='Shard Of Stardust' timestamp='1299612286' post='5060605'] Am I the only one that noticed you can OTK with Overdragon with using just 6 Monsters dealing 10,800 Damage if you clear the entire field for a direct attack? [/quote] Urr...yeah, like [i]no-one[/i] knew that. Also, [img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110123220615/yugioh/images/thumb/8/87/EffectVeilerDP10-EN-R-1E.png/300px-EffectVeilerDP10-EN-R-1E.png[/img] is why the OTK is meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vector Nightmare Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 ITT: People summon Overdragon by using materials on the field / hand. Troll topic is troll. The construction of all extra decks begins by placing CFD in it. Just because it's so damn fun to troll Machin[s]e[/s]as Someone should have thought of CFD cards when they were getting owned by the Machine Emperors in the anime. Both should be banned. EDIT: Also, how did I miss that stupidity, COD can't attack multiple times unless the opponent has monsters on the field, trolls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 I agree that both should be banned. Maybe ONE Fortress Dragon, but then again it would never be used for its intended purpose (IE abused) so never mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 Overdragon can't attack directly more than once, and not if it killed a monster first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted March 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [quote name='~ Epic Hero - Saber ~' timestamp='1299613173' post='5060629'] EDIT: Also, how did I miss that stupidity, COD can't attack multiple times unless the opponent has monsters on the field, trolls. [/quote] Can't it? I always thought It could Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 No it can't attack directly multiple times, but you still don't need to attack multiple times when you have 8000+ ATK due to Future Fusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [quote name='Shard Of Stardust' timestamp='1299615165' post='5060715'] Can't it? I always thought It could [/quote] then you didn't read the effect properly at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted March 8, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [quote name='slayer_supreme' timestamp='1299615219' post='5060717'] No it can't attack directly multiple times, but you still don't need to attack multiple times when you have 8000+ ATK due to Future Fusion. [/quote] I read the lore wrong for the past what...2 Years? Can't believe I could be that stupid... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [quote name='Shard Of Stardust' timestamp='1299615165' post='5060715'] Can't it? I always thought It could [/quote] Each turn, this card can attack [b]as many of your opponent's monsters[/b] as the number of Fusion Material Monsters used for its Fusion Summon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 And before anyone goes and overreacts about me mentioning Future Fusion, you OBVIOUSLY are going to activate Overload Fusion immediately afterward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vector Nightmare Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 [quote name='slayer_supreme' timestamp='1299616326' post='5060768'] And before anyone goes and overreacts about me mentioning Future Fusion, you OBVIOUSLY are going to activate Overload Fusion immediately afterward. [/quote] Oh come on, noone can be THAT bad - [quote name='Shard Of Stardust' timestamp='1299615306' post='5060721'] I read the lore wrong for the past what...2 Years? Can't believe I could be that stupid... [/quote] owait :-raziontrollface Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted March 9, 2011 Report Share Posted March 9, 2011 I love these cards to death, but both of them are absurdly overpowered and banworthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zkaiser Posted March 9, 2011 Report Share Posted March 9, 2011 [quote name='Shard Of Stardust' timestamp='1299615306' post='5060721']Can't believe I could be that stupid... [/quote] I feel compelled to quote this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted March 9, 2011 Report Share Posted March 9, 2011 [quote name='Shard Of Stardust' timestamp='1299612286' post='5060605'] Am I the only one that noticed you can OTK with Overdragon with using just 6 Monsters dealing 10,800 Damage if you clear the entire field for a direct attack? [/quote] Your math bewilders me. 6 x 800= 4800. Even Limiter Removal or Power Bond won't give you a total of 10,800. Actually, NO number of Fusion Materials gives you a total of 10,800 when attacking directly. Why was Overload Fusion semi-limited? Overdragon is the reason it was limited in the first place, and both Future Fusion and Chimeratech aren't banned. Overdragon is so blatantly an OTK card I cannot understand why it's not been banned, or if not it, then Future Fusion/Overload Fusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbu-of-Sand Posted March 9, 2011 Report Share Posted March 9, 2011 Not going to talk about Chimeratech. Fortress makes for somewhat of a decent Extra Deck (Tech), due to the decent amount of Decks out there with Cyber Dragon + a few Machine-Type monsters....yeah, that's about it. I don't think they should be banned though. I find them somewhat fine at 1. I hardly see them get played anymore though >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted March 9, 2011 Report Share Posted March 9, 2011 So "Chimeratech Overdragon" = Chimeratech, but "[b]Chimeratech[/b] Fortress Dragon" = Fortress? Why? These really should not have been made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted March 9, 2011 Report Share Posted March 9, 2011 Permission Gadgets are always so hell annoying, they deserve this pain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zkaiser Posted March 9, 2011 Report Share Posted March 9, 2011 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1299642787' post='5061841'] So "Chimeratech Overdragon" = Chimeratech, but "[b]Chimeratech[/b] Fortress Dragon" = Fortress? Why? These really should not have been made. [/quote] Because Chimeratech Overdragon was released a looong time before Fortress was and he was coined Chimeratech. You can't give 2 cards the same nickname. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.