Cody Frost Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 Even without a Special Summon capability, it's still a powerful card for any deck. XD It'll probably be seen in most duels at least once. Link to comment
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 See anyone playing my Tera Void's? Also can I sees your arch-type? Link to comment
Cody Frost Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 You're probably the first one to use it, but there's going to be others that might tech in some support from there. Also, my archtype is in my sig. Link to comment
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 Is your arch the SWAT-Kats -Is so confused- [img]http://public.yugiohcardmaker.net/public/style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif[/img] Link to comment
Cody Frost Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 "The Flame Barrier is back and hotter than before!" Link to comment
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 [quote name='Cody Frost' timestamp='1310259934' post='5341661'] "The Flame Barrier is back and hotter than before!" [/quote] -Is burning- Nooooooo Your arch is so risky. You could die from there effects but................ these 2 so make up for it. [spoiler=Burn][img]http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/1227/67897z.jpg[/img] [img]http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/3127/67897r.jpg[/img] [/spoiler] Link to comment
Cody Frost Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 It's risky, but the support cards make up for that. All the Spell Cards are up if you want to check it out. I'ma post the Trap Cards tmro. I'm also gonna work on some "Theme" cards for this set...but I'ma have to brush up on my Greek Mythology. :3 Links? Link to comment
SirtyStan Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 Wow... Skill. So should I change my entries to SET1, or have you already done so? Also, any thoughts on my card at all? Are they OP'ed, UP'ed, or are they not to your liking? Link to comment
.Rai Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 So many archetypes At this rate, we'll have to cut some off I'm planning an Infernity style archetype which will be in this set. I have an archetype slot since I never submitted one last set. Link to comment
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 Anyone up for a dual? Link to comment
Cody Frost Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 Current TRUE Archtypes (The ones introduced last set are in [b]bold[/b]) [b]"Aura" "Flame Barrier" "Nanotech" "Storm"[/b] Ledakan - sǝlnɹʍʇp Tera Void - ♥ D.A._Fortune Lady ♥‘ Molten - Sirty_stan That are just enough IMO. If you count themes and sub-types though, we also have: [b]Mill-Fairies Spirits Neptune's Pirates Thunder Control Equip Dragons (NOT Dragunities ) Plants[/b] DARK Dragons - Corbernik Myth/Legend Elementals - Cody Frost Mechanical Control - sǝlnɹʍʇp Those should be all unless I overlooked something. (.-.) TBH, I think that's the right balance of Archtype/Themes/Sub-Types in the set. @D.A. - I would, but first I'm gonna see what's wrong with my connection... Link to comment
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 Cody [url="http://theochem.chem.rug.nl/resources/Mythica.html"]http://theochem.chem.rug.nl/resources/Mythica.html[/url] Link to comment
Cody Frost Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 [quote name='Sirty_stan' timestamp='1310271771' post='5342182'] Wow... Skill. So should I change my entries to SET1, or have you already done so? Also, any thoughts on my card at all? Are they OP'ed, UP'ed, or are they not to your liking? [/quote] YES! Switch the SET# to SET1. :3 As for the archtype itself, I'll give them a review later on today. [quote name='♥ D.A._Fortune Lady ♥' timestamp='1310303031' post='5342881'] Cody [url="http://theochem.chem.rug.nl/resources/Mythica.html"]http://theochem.chem.rug.nl/resources/Mythica.html[/url] [/quote] TY! ^^ [s]You know what D.A.? Host the duel. Maybe connecting will get rid of the problems.[/s] NVM, found out what the problem is. It's gonna be a while before I fix it though >.< Link to comment
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 [quote name='Cody Frost' timestamp='1310303938' post='5342890'] TY! ^^ [s]You know what D.A.? Host the duel. Maybe connecting will get rid of the problems.[/s] NVM, found out what the problem is. It's gonna be a while before I fix it though >.< [/quote] Np okay Link to comment
SirtyStan Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 Hmm... Just so I get this right... The proper YVD format is |Card name|Card#|SET#|Otherstuff~| Link to comment
.Rai Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 We have Griffins as an archetype/theme. That reminds me, we really have to update the wiki. If everyone could help update, that'll be great. There are several SET0 cards without a wiki entry. Link to comment
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 [color=#1C2837][font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif]I feel that some might misinterpret this card so I'm going to give you it's rulings. [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif]|Wrath of the Tera Void King!|0|SET0|Trap Card|Trap||Countinious|||This card can only be activated when there is a "Tera Void King" in your Graveyard. Special Summon 1 "Tera Void King" from your Graveyard ignoring Summoning conditions. Any card sent to the Graveyard is [/font][font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif][b]considered[/b][/font][font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif] to be banished instead.|[/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif] [/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif] [/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif]The bold is the most important factor in that effect.[/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif] [/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif]What [b]considered[/b] means is that even though the cards go to the graveyard, they are considered to be banished instead. This means you DON'T send those cards to the Banished zone.[/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif] [/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif]Cards sent to the graveyard before this effect is activated are still considered to be in the graveyard.[/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif] [/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif]If it's destroyed, cards sent to the graveyard while it was on the field go back to being considered to be in the graveyard.[/font] [/font][/color] [color=#1C2837][font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif] [/font][/color] [color=#1C2837][font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif] [/font][/color] [font="tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif"][color="#1c2837"]This being said, I foresee this and King (Tera Void) to have a possible Anti-Meta Deck around the 2.[/color][/font] [font="tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif"][color="#1c2837"] [/color][/font] [font="tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif"][color="#1c2837"] [/color][/font] [font="tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif"][color="#1c2837"]Also heres another card.[/color][/font] [font="tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif"][color="#1c2837"] [/color][/font] [font="tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif"][color="#1c2837"][spoiler=Another Generic] [/color][/font] [font="tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif"][color="#1c2837"]Regenerating Destruction Pot[/color][/font] [font="tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif"][color="#1c2837"] [/color][/font] [font="tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif"][color="#1c2837"]During each Standby Phase both players draw 1 card and discard 1 card from there hand. [/color][/font] [font="tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif"][color="#1c2837"][/spoiler][/color][/font] Link to comment
.Rai Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 Regenerating Destruction Pot is what? A Continuous Spell? Also, I'm fixing the OCG of every card. Why can't people be consistent with their OCG ;_; I'm also checking broken cards. There's a lot =/ Link to comment
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 [quote name='Cursed Reaction' timestamp='1310325420' post='5343407'] Regenerating Destruction Pot is what? A Continuous Spell? Also, I'm fixing the OCG of every card. Why can't people be consistent with their OCG ;_; I'm also checking broken cards. There's a lot =/ [/quote] Right, forgot sry [spoiler=Card] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif][color=#1C2837]Regenerating Destruction Pot[/color][/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif][color=#1C2837] [/color][/font][font="tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif"]Continuous Spell[/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif][color=#1C2837]During each Standby Phase both players draw 1 card and discard 1 card from there hand. [/spoiler][/color][/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif][color=#1C2837] [/color][/font] [font=tahoma, arial, verdana, sans-serif][color=#1C2837]Also, are you going to be editing Wrath?[/color][/font] Link to comment
.Rai Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 No. It looks fine. EDIT: Also, some cards are quite useless because some cards that are mentioned in their effect don't exist. Link to comment
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 [font=arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif][size=2]Hmm..............how many more cards are needed before submission's no longer apply? EDIT: I hope your not referring to any of my cards.[/size][/font] Link to comment
вєgσттєη ιηѕαηιту Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 then change it too something like "1 Light Monster" or something that makes sense in the space for it. Link to comment
Cody Frost Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 [quote name='Cursed Reaction' timestamp='1310315644' post='5343130'] We have Griffins as an archetype/theme. That reminds me, we really have to update the wiki. If everyone could help update, that'll be great. There are several SET0 cards without a wiki entry. [/quote] Wiki, wiki, wiki...I wonder why many have almost forgotten of you? :3 [quote name='Cursed Reaction' timestamp='1310325420' post='5343407'] [b]Also, I'm fixing the OCG of every card. Why can't people be consistent with their OCG ;_; I'm also checking broken cards. There's a lot =/[/b] [/quote] GEE-ZUS! O_O ALL 151 of them?! [quote name='Cursed Reaction' timestamp='1310325619' post='5343416'] Also, some cards are quite useless because some cards that are mentioned in their effect don't exist. [/quote] Do we have many of these? On another topic, I think I figured out what was wrong with the YVD on my end...but not sure if I fixed it. Anyone want to duel to test out? YVD name - Wolfy_Eddy Link to comment
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 [quote name='Cody Frost' timestamp='1310326544' post='5343452'] Wiki, wiki, wiki...I wonder why many have almost forgotten of you? :3 GEE-ZUS! O_O ALL 151 of them?! Do we have many of these? [b]On another topic, I think I figured out what was wrong with the YVD on my end...but not sure if I fixed it. Anyone want to duel to test out? YVD name - Wolfy_Eddy[/b] [/quote] Sure Link to comment
.Rai Posted July 10, 2011 Report Share Posted July 10, 2011 Should I fix names which have wrong-spelt names? Example: dtwrules' Pollenator. Should it be Pollinator? I'm assuming not but there are others. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.