Toffee. Posted April 30, 2011 Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 ITT: Byakk becomes a mod. [quote name='A Veritable Truth' timestamp='1304182094' post='5179085'] Though I feel like a hypothetical card discussion serves the exact same purpose as Written/Realistic, drawing attention away from those forums [/quote] Except the idea behind said topic is that we make actual serious cards, and discuss weather or not something like that would be metaworthy. Or something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted April 30, 2011 Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 Made a beta topic about a MTG card that go some little attention even from people with curiosity for how card worked... call it a success? yes/no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted April 30, 2011 Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 [quote name='-Dae-' timestamp='1304184350' post='5179164'] that go some little attention [/quote] Thing is, not everyone knows how to play [Cardgame X] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted April 30, 2011 Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 I stil prefer Arm's idea. No offense to any of you realistic card fellas (I used to be one myself, but whatever) but most people in that forum are like "nuu, mi card aint overpowered, just cuz it adds 3 exodia pieces to my hand, i still have to pay 400 life points, remember!!!!111 trololololololol" People in the YuGiOh section are somewhat smarter (the key word here: [b]somewhat[/b]) so we'd have proper cards, not stupid s*** like my example above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted April 30, 2011 Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 Discussing said deck rather than improving it is the best idea to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbu-of-Sand Posted April 30, 2011 Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 [quote name='iHop' timestamp='1304187148' post='5179279'] Discussing said deck rather than improving it is the best idea to me. [/quote] Well then, why not do both in said Thread? Discuss your opinion on the Deck, and discuss what the Deck needs to become better as a whole. Or is what I had just said redundant / the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted April 30, 2011 Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 ^Would work, Anbu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted April 30, 2011 Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 [quote name='Cyber Eltanin' timestamp='1304185995' post='5179231'] I stil prefer Arm's idea. No offense to any of you realistic card fellas (I used to be one myself, but whatever) but most people in that forum are like "nuu, mi card aint overpowered, just cuz it adds 3 exodia pieces to my hand, i still have to pay 400 life points, remember!!!!111 trololololololol" People in the YuGiOh section are somewhat smarter (the key word here: [b]somewhat[/b]) so we'd have proper cards, not stupid s*** like my example above. [/quote] Doing this also has the chance that the kids who post those kinds of cards in RC would just come over here to try to prove their point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted April 30, 2011 Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 [quote name='Cyber Eltanin' timestamp='1304185995' post='5179231'] No offense to any of you realistic card fellas (I used to be one myself, but whatever) but most people in that forum are like "nuu, mi card aint overpowered, just cuz it adds 3 exodia pieces to my hand, i still have to pay 400 life points, remember!!!!111 trololololololol" [/quote] Because half the people don't know the different between an LOLCSOT and an actual cost. And usually what happens, is the card becomes underpowered. Written Cards needs to understand a bit of the metagame gimmicks. It would make things interesting. (EG; LP aren't that important anymore) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted April 30, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 [quote name='Klavier Gavin' timestamp='1304184062' post='5179155'] No, he chosed to re-validate, and he still didn't get the email. So yeah, he can't post [/quote] He could have asked a mod to do it if he was having trouble. On-topic: It's already done. On an unrelated note: [quote]I actually like the idea of a deck discussion, incorporating guides, show records of builds that have topped events, news regarding the techs and builds regarding it. I've seen many members who carry an out-dated mind set when it comes to certain decks (including myself), only because discussion of those decks only happen once in a while. A lot of players in the TCG section probably get their knowledge of the game and the meta simply through card discussion and the Your Deck section, which isn't exactly reliable with updating what techs actually tested good and what did not, and seeing as how everyone is a mindless slave here, they will probably spit out false, out-dated information until someone like Manjy, Byakk, or anyone else who is respected posts otherwise. Also, members who focus more towards the TCG section tend to have very low post counts compared to members who focus on other sections (despite seniority), simply because there isn't any continuous discussion in the TCG section. An active environment with open discussion at all times is probaby the best way to keep up with the other members, whom may look down on on TCG active members simply due to low post count.[/quote] My only real issue with a "guide" section would be that eventually all the guides would get REALLY outdated unless they were updated very frequently. A guide on every single concievable deck/archetype that gets updated about once a week. Sure, it's possible, one post a day, but by then it'd get horribly unorganized. Yeah, organization is kind of important to me. No one wants to sift through a terrible unorganized heap, like what the strat section currently is. ... That being said, if he wants to he can go ahead and make guides. At that applies to everyone, I suppose. Just, remember to tag titles. [GUIDE] or something for something that's supposed to be a guide of an archetype. Just make sure it's really obvious what you're talking about to anyone who sees just the title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black W Mage Posted April 30, 2011 Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 [quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1304189693' post='5179391'] He could have asked a mod to do it if he was having trouble. My only real issue with a "guide" section would be that eventually all the guides would get REALLY outdated unless they were updated very frequently. A guide on every single concievable deck/archetype that gets updated about once a week. Sure, it's possible, one post a day, but by then it'd get horribly unorganized. Yeah, organization is kind of important to me. No one wants to sift through a terrible unorganized heap, like what the strat section currently is. ... That being said, if he wants to he can go ahead and make guides. At that applies to everyone, I suppose. Just, remember to tag titles. [GUIDE] or something for something that's supposed to be a guide of an archetype. Just make sure it's really obvious what you're talking about to anyone who sees just the title. [/quote] lol, couldn't pm anybody, and thanks (cuz I assume it was you). Yeah, I figured the only problem with the guide idea would be the lack of a large playerbase to keep on updating the guides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbu-of-Sand Posted April 30, 2011 Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 Somewhat of a dumb question: Pika (or any Mod really), can you change the name / Sub Title for Strategy, or can only YCMaker do such a thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted April 30, 2011 Report Share Posted April 30, 2011 A suggestion: Make an announcement that states what should be happening with that section, to avoid confusion for people who haven't read this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1304184183' post='5179160'] ITT: Byakk becomes a mod. [/quote] I'm too awesome to be a mod. Also they're not just guides, they're discussions about decks in general. If you'd like to see what I'm talking about check up on Duelist Groundz' deck discussion threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 [quote]If you'd like to see what I'm talking about check up on Duelist Groundz' deck discussion threads.[/quote] or pojo's if you cba to make an acc (their discussion might be mostly terrible, but they follow the same pattern) also >yugioh tcg section >discuss mtg wat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black W Mage Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1304235080' post='5181193'] or pojo's if you cba to make an acc (their discussion might be mostly terrible, but they follow the same pattern) [/quote] they really are, which is why I'm hoping we can do better than them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1304235080' post='5181193'] >yugioh tcg section >discuss mtg wat [/quote] I laughed at this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black W Mage Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1304235080' post='5181193'] >yugioh tcg section >discuss mtg wat [/quote] It sucks because I don't understand mtg at all, but I'm guessing if you translated MTG into Yugioh terms, I assume that whole page would look something like "Pot of Duality. Seven Tools of the Bandit. Solemn Judgment. Effect Veiler. Morphing Jar." and other stuff that would otherwise provide no productive discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brinolovania Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1304235080' post='5181193'] >yugioh tcg section >discuss mtg wat [/quote] What the point of the internet be if it was logical? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1304235080' post='5181193'] >yugioh tcg section [/quote] Your arguement fell apart right here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 [quote]Your arguement fell apart right here.[/quote] And yours doesn't exist, retard. Also, "argument". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 @Manjy: What's wrong with having a place for other TCGs? It's not like DGz and Pojo (just to use the other 2 mentioned forums as an example) don't have sections for that, and it's not like we have the authority to move/create/rename sections, so that would be the only place to slip it in if it goes in at all... @Red: "I don't play MtG, so it's a horrible idea." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 [quote]What's wrong with having a place for other TCGs?[/quote] Where did I say that there is something wrong with this? I just think that it is illogical to put it in the yugioh tcg section. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EHN. Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 So far, byakk's idea is the best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black W Mage Posted May 1, 2011 Report Share Posted May 1, 2011 [quote name='burnpsy' timestamp='1304267511' post='5181861'] @Red: "I don't play MtG, so it's a horrible idea." [/quote] [quote name='Red W Mage No. 6-2-5' timestamp='1304261234' post='5181586'] It sucks because... [/quote] I assume you mislead my statement, I meant it sucks for me to have a section dedicated to MTG, I didn't say the idea was horrible. Though, I also made the point that, so far, the MTG discussion seems to be only discussing Staples, which doesn't really produce much discussion because everyone says "yeah, good card is good". Also, card discussion doesn't really seem complete without a place to put decks that use those cards in practice... IDK though, I could see use if it becomes popular enough, here anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.