ForteSP Posted February 9, 2008 Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 (Not a 'Roid Deck) Monsters: (18 ) 3x Cyber Dragon2x Green Gadget2x Red Gadget2x Yellow Gadget2x Blue Thunder T-452x Drillroid3x Banisher of the Radiance1x Breaker the Magical Warrior1x Neo-Spacian Grand Mole Spells: (13) 2x Soul Taker1x Smashing Ground1x Fissure1x Lightning Vortex1x Mystical Space Typhoon1x Heavy Storm1x Pot of Avarice3x Shrink2x Enemy Controller Traps: (10) 3x Solemn Judgment3x Bottomless Trap Hole2x Dimensional Prison1x Mirror Force1x Torrential Tribute1x Trap Dustshoot Total Cards: (41) R/F Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted February 9, 2008 Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 I knew I saw that deck somewhere. http://forum.tcgplayer.com/showthread.php?t=122541 That better be you, because this is pretty damn low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForteSP Posted February 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 I knew I saw that deck somewhere. http://forum.tcgplayer.com/showthread.php?t=122541 That better be you' date=' because this is pretty damn low.[/quote'] It's not me. But I assure you, I have never seen that thread before. Matter of fact, I built this deck a long time ago, when I found out that Blue Thunder was usable in Gadgets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted February 9, 2008 Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 The only change worth noting was Soul Taker over Hammershot, which was a suggestion given in that very thread. Yeah, I'm not buying it without evidence. I feel sorry for anyone who does. Until then, continue to pass off netdecked decks as your own. Edit: Actually, you know what, I will buy it. It's just standard Gadgets with Blue Thunder anyway. Carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted February 9, 2008 Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 Netdecking = Bad. Don't do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForteSP Posted February 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 The only change worth noting was Soul Taker over Hammershot' date=' which was a suggestion given in that very thread. Yeah, I'm not buying it without evidence. I feel sorry for anyone who does. Until then, continue to pass off netdecked decks as your own.[/quote'] I'm not gonna argue with you. You are right, I cannot prove that I made this deck. Nor do I have any evidence, other than my computer's notepad, and it'll be totally pointless arguing over the Internet on something I can't prove. But I never seen that thread up until you linked it. I just did'nt like the fact that you called me a netdecker, I believe it's a little unfair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted February 9, 2008 Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 Hey man, before you go QQ-ing everywhere, read my edit, which, for reference, was made before your post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForteSP Posted February 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 Hey man' date=' before you go QQ-ing everywhere, read my edit, which, for reference, was made before your post.[/quote'] lol did'nt notice sorry. EDIT: Well before this became the Kira Case, minus the epic, does anyone still have any suggestions? Every time I look, I feel like there's something missing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Best Male 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 ^ uh....Limiter removal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted February 9, 2008 Report Share Posted February 9, 2008 Limiter Removal is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 ^^ LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Limiter Removal is bad. you...got...to...be...joking...:x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draco Straybyrn Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Ergh. No Limiter. The deck's based too much around 1 for 1. 'nuff said. It's aim isn't to swarm. It should be, but it isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 hmmm *waits for ban* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Limiter Removal and rush for 8k? All the while healing with Soul Taker. K. This isn't an aggro deck that aims to reduce LP to 0 as quick as it can, it aims to reduce opponent's options to 0. Then, it can do whatever the hell it wants to, with or without attack points. Every single S/T is a 1 for 1 trade or better, apart from Shrink/Econ. Ironically, Shrink/Econ function in the same way Limiter does, except it doesn't kill your monster in the process for a -1. If you're using Blue Thunder and trying hardcore to aggro, you're playing the damn deck wrong. And playing against better players, you generally won't have more than two monsters on the field at one time. -Cydras when CFD comes out in TCG. @tonisanoob: Get use to the real world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kocrow17 Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Post Deleted. 3 Day Ban. T_T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Witt Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 nice, never thought of putting Cyber Dragons in with Gadgets 7/10 10/10 if you put Ancient Gear Gadjilatron Dragon and Chimera, along with Stronghold the Moving Fortress Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Best Male 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 nice' date=' never thought of putting Cyber Dragons in with Gadgets 7/10 10/10 if you put[b'] Ancient Gear Gadjilatron Dragon [/b]and Chimera, along with Stronghold the Moving Fortress omg.....omg...eeeew NO die not really but eew did your mom drop you on your head? srry xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Witt Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 HUH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Blue Thunder's a pretty powerful card for Gadget-type decks, and the only problem I have with this is Soul Taker, and only because it increases your opponent's Life Points. Otherwise, the deck is nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 HUH He says this because Gadget support (by which I mean cards that specifically require the Gadgets to be used) isn't used very much, because it is simply not very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Best Male 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 HUH He says this because Gadget support (by which I mean cards that specifically require the Gadgets to be used) isn't used very much' date=' because it is simply not very good.[/quote'] so...no one has seen the invisi text in my post then :s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 It probably would have been better if you hadn't pointed that out ^^ But no, I didn't see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 nice' date=' never thought of putting Cyber Dragons in with Gadgets 7/10 10/10 if you put Ancient Gear Gadjilatron Dragon and Chimera, along with Stronghold the Moving Fortress[/quote'] Never thought about CyDras in Gadget Deck? Dude, the Ancient Gear Gadjilatron Dragon and Chimera, along with Stronghold the Moving Fortress SUCK!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.