Max Darkness Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 I'm tired. Which means I started really messing with the rules of YGO. Case in point. Enjoy. [center][IMG]http://i51.tinypic.com/2h33qtu.png[/IMG][/center] [b]Effect:[/b] Activate only when you Summon a monster or activate a card effect, and a card(s) effect(s) is activated in response. Select 2 cards in this card's Chain, except this card. Switch the Chain Link numbers of those cards. If this card is Banished without being activated, you can activate this card's effect once. If you do, this card cannot leave the Banished Zone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 VERY SITUATIONAL, Max. I am not too fond of the image. But at some point, it could prove to be quite handy. 10/10 Never miss your insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted June 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='Daemon' timestamp='1309055819' post='5311045'] VERY SITUATIONAL, Max. [/quote] Do you think so? It's mainly designed to screw over "Bottomless Trap Hole" (sort of), "Divine Wrath", "Solemn Warning" and "Solemn Judgment" in a creative way. I might change the effect slightly to allow it to select any two cards in the chain, hence removing the limitation on CL 3 activation. [quote name='Daemon' timestamp='1309055819' post='5311045'] I am not too fond of the image. But at some point, it could prove to be quite handy. 10/10 Never miss your insane. [/quote] Thanks for rating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 summoning doesn't start a chain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted June 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='marcher boyz' timestamp='1309088753' post='5311595'] summoning doesn't start a chain [/quote] The effect has been reworded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote]Activate only when you Summon a monster or activate a card effect, and card effects are activated in response. Select 2 cards in this card's Chain, except this card. Switch the Chain Link numbers of those cards. If this card is Banished without being activated, you can activate this card's effect once. If you do, this card cannot leave the Banished Zone. [/quote] so you summon a guy, and your opponent activates an effect there's 1 chain link there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted June 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='marcher boyz' timestamp='1309093015' post='5311629'] so you summon a guy, and your opponent activates an effect there's 1 chain link there [/quote] The Summon clause is for the case you Summon a monster, and two or more cards are chained to that Summon. It is more useful after card activations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcher boyz Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote]I might change the effect slightly to allow it to select any two cards in the chain, hence removing the limitation on CL 3 activation.[/quote] "Activate only as Chain Link 3 or higher" is the only way this can work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted June 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='marcher boyz' timestamp='1309103223' post='5311899'] "Activate only as Chain Link 3 or higher" is the only way this can work. [/quote] Indeed, but the original effect locked it at CL 3 activation. Now it can be activated as 3, 4 or higher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='Max Darkness' timestamp='1309111663' post='5312190'] Indeed, but the original effect locked it at CL 3 activation. Now it can be activated as 3, 4 or higher. [/quote] I've been following this conversation for a while and I didn't understand this last part. Isn't "chain link 3 [b]or higher[/b]" the same as "chain link 3, [b]4, or higher[/b]" in meaning? If so, I vote for the "3 or higher" one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted June 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='sleepy' timestamp='1309112555' post='5312232'] I've been following this conversation for a while and I didn't understand this last part. Isn't "chain link 3 [b]or higher[/b]" the same as "chain link 3, [b]4, or higher[/b]" in meaning? If so, I vote for the "3 or higher" one... [/quote] Yes, but I haven't put either on the card, since neither are needed. And the point was that the original effect forced it to activate at Chain Link 3, forbidding to chain any higher. That has since been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 This time for my own comment: If I got the effect right, when a chain starts with one of YOUR cards as chain link 1, or if a chain started developing from a Summon you just performed, is the time when this will activate regardless of the number of chain links. Although it needs 2 or more links other than this card to work.... Then I understand that Summoning, not being a chain link, is only there just to give an extra activations chance for when you can't be chain link 1. Sounds interesting, very interesting.... saves cards from being negated, and its a Counter like all chain-link cards should be to avoid chaining negation to them. For what I see, it really seems like the standard and best way to write it is "chain link 3 or higher". Don't want to sound pushy about this but it sounds like it. It doesn't matter very much though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted June 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='sleepy' timestamp='1309120247' post='5312549'] This time for my own comment: If I got the effect right, when a chain starts with one of YOUR cards as chain link 1, or if a chain started developing from a Summon you just performed, is the time when this will activate regardless of the number of chain links. Although it needs 2 or more links other than this card to work.... Then I understand that Summoning, not being a chain link, is only there just to give an extra activations chance for when you can't be chain link 1. Sounds interesting, very interesting.... saves cards from being negated, and its a Counter like all chain-link cards should be to avoid chaining negation to them. For what I see, it really seems like the standard and best way to write it is "chain link 3 or higher". Don't want to sound pushy about this but it sounds like it. It doesn't matter very much though... [/quote] It can only activate as Chain Link 3 or higher, due to its need of at least two activations to preceed it, so such an activation condition isn't needed on the card. Thanks for the comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 [quote name='Max Darkness' timestamp='1309126109' post='5312896'] It can only activate as Chain Link 3 or higher, due to its need of at least two activations to preceed it, so such an activation condition isn't needed on the card. Thanks for the comments. [/quote] I'm ok with that. Just want to point out, it sounds to me like you are misinterpreting it. Its not an extra unnecessary writing being suggested, but rather an alternative writing. You sound like you think we are suggesting adding that extra chain like3+ stuff on top of what's already there but that's not the case. (just trying to clarify that~) I would actually like seeing this printed or something along the lines. EDIT: Oh wait! It just hit me. I know what you mean. hmmmmm.... +REP for the bother and because I like the card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted June 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2011 [quote name='sleepy' timestamp='1309132451' post='5313175'] I'm ok with that. Just want to point out, it sounds to me like you are misinterpreting it. Its not an extra unnecessary writing being suggested, but rather an alternative writing. You sound like you think we are suggesting adding that extra chain like3+ stuff on top of what's already there but that's not the case. (just trying to clarify that~) I would actually like seeing this printed or something along the lines. EDIT: Oh wait! It just hit me. I know what you mean. hmmmmm.... +REP for the bother and because I like the card. [/quote] Excellent. I wonder if others will also appreciate the strange simplicity of it all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted June 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2011 I'll give this a bump for comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted June 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 Anyone want to comment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Posted June 28, 2011 Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 [font="Century Gothic"][size="1.5"][color="#A0522D"][center]I actually love the strangeness of this card xD. Probably because strangeness is awesome... OCG looks fine. Original effect is original & creative. Pic is decent but it was a bit hard to decipher what it was at first xD. When i first saw this thread i thought it was titled 'Blissful Ignorance' and i was going to bomb the OT with +Reps xD. I am a bit disappoint but I'm going to +Rep anyway because i like the card =D.[/center][/color][/size][/font] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Darkness Posted June 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2011 [quote name='Classic' timestamp='1309296327' post='5317756'] [font="Century Gothic"][size="1.5"][color="#A0522D"][center]I actually love the strangeness of this card xD. Probably because strangeness is awesome... OCG looks fine. Original effect is original & creative. Pic is decent but it was a bit hard to decipher what it was at first xD. When i first saw this thread i thought it was titled 'Blissful Ignorance' and i was going to bomb the OT with +Reps xD. I am a bit disappoint but I'm going to +Rep anyway because i like the card =D.[/center][/color][/size][/font] [/quote] The pic is, just for reference, a small girl in a world of her own screwing the rules to her heart's content... Thanks for the rate and rep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.