Zetsu-plant Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 [img]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i465/DeathlyFiend/Zetsu2-1.png?t=1311256883[/img] [spoiler=lore]3 Level 4 monsters This card can only be destroyed by battle with another "Number" monster. You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card to target 1 monster your opponent controls; destroy the target and inflict damage to your opponent equal to that monster's ATK[/spoiler] Please rate and comment this card is by Daemon and template by Baraka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 Pretty good. Nothing really to say other than that. Oh, I can say that the "This card can only be destroyed by battle with another "Number" monster." part of the effect isn't needed, since that effect is only Anime Only, meaning IRL Xyz don't have that effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetsu-plant Posted July 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 haha ok i cant really change that on this card haha i could ask Daemon later though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 1 sided Ring of Destruction's effect, I like it 1st effect is a bit meh though for battle immunity I would have said once there's no more XYZ attached to it, it'll destroy itself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetsu-plant Posted July 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 hmmmm i was gonna do a leviathan dragon where it can't attack while it has no Xyz monsters on it also when i use this card im going to tell people to not pay attention to the first effect haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted July 21, 2011 Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 well what I'm saying is you can say once it has no XYZs it'll kill itself but then you can also add an effect where it can add XYZ monsters to it now obviously the adding part you make it slower so you can't abuse the burn effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetsu-plant Posted July 21, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2011 yeah i'll probaly make a continuous trap card that says it negates the burn effect so it can still attack but no burning effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 [quote name='Power Play' timestamp='1311281169' post='5375212'] Pretty good. Nothing really to say other than that. [b]Oh, I can say that the "This card can only be destroyed by battle with another "Number" monster." part of the effect isn't needed, since that effect is only Anime Only, meaning IRL Xyz don't have that effect.[/b] [/quote] Perhaps he likes that clause, is perfectly aware of its absence in the actual game, and wanted to give this card that immunity? If he wanted to make it follow the anime more, than that's fine. [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1311284583' post='5375412'] well what I'm saying is you can say once it has no XYZs it'll kill itself but then you can also add an effect where it can add XYZ monsters to it now obviously the adding part you make it slower so you can't abuse the burn effect [/quote] That's actually a terrible suggestion. When Xyzs have no materials, they're typically just beatsticks, rendering this card nothing more than another BEWD. It's only Numbers that have the negative effect when they lack Xyz Materials, and destroying it when it runs out of materials is awful. This card works as a 3000 ATK Flare Wingman, so it's pretty good as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetsu-plant Posted July 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 haha thanks man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Frost Posted July 22, 2011 Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 Burn effect = Good Summon Conditions = Easy Stats = Maxed Battle Protection Effect = Not Necessary Drawback = Needs a minor one. The "This card cannot attack if it does not have an Xyz Material Monster" clause sounds pretty good. Overall rating: 8.7/10 Would run at least 1, kind of like Catastor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetsu-plant Posted July 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2011 thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.