The Everburning Flame Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 Blue-Eyes White Dragon + Red-Eyes B. Dragon This monster cannot be Special Summoned except by sending the above monsters from your side of the field to the Graveyard (You do not use Polymerization). Once per turn you can Special Summon a Dragon type monster from your hand or graveyard or you can tribute a Dragon type monster on your side of the field to have this monster gain ATK equal to the ATK of the tributed monster until the end phase of your opponents next turn. If this monster attacks after activating its effect it is changed to defense position at the end of the battle phase and its position cannot be changed until your next turn except with a card effect. If this monster is destroyed in defense position you take direct damage equal to the ATK of the monster that destroyed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 The last effect makes it completely useless. If you're going to go through all of the trouble of Fusion Summoning him out, why would you have an effect that makes it completely vulnerable in Defense Position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [center][center]Playability: 8/10 OCG: 5/10 Balance: 10/10 Creativity: 7/10 Name: 2/5 Pic: 5/5 Total: 37/50 (7.4/10)[/center][/center] [center][center]Useless though, just a Red-Eyes Darkness Metal effect with a Gift of the Martyr with a suicidal twist. Also the same ATK as one of the fusion materials. I would rather just have Red Eyes and Blue Eyes on the field. [/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Everburning Flame Posted August 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 Because it balances out the card if you increase its attack by tributing a Dragon with 3000 attack to raise its own. Besides there is a good reason for that effect. Im finishing up a card that uses this dragon by equiping it. Also that effect that switches it automatically do defense only will activate if you use its own effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [center][center]Ah, nice.[/center][/center] [center][center]Picture credit?[/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [quote name='The Everburning Flame' timestamp='1312864933' post='5426790'] Because it balances out the card if you increase its attack by tributing a Dragon with 3000 attack to raise its own. [b]Besides there is a good reason for that effect.[/b] [/quote] No, there isn't. Sure the first effect is nice, being able to get some burst damage out of the monster temporarily, but then you just go and waste it, especially if it switches position at the end of the Battle Phase and it's got.......0........Defense Points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Everburning Flame Posted August 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 I missed part of the effect at there anyway here is the fixed one: Blue-Eyes White Dragon + Red-Eyes B. Dragon This monster cannot be Special Summoned except by sending the above monsters from your side of the field to the Graveyard (You do not use Polymerization). Once per turn you can Special Summon a Dragon type monster from your hand or graveyard or you can tribute a Dragon type monster on your side of the field to have this monster gain ATK equal to the ATK of the tributed monster until the end phase of your opponents next turn. If this monster attacks after activating its effect it is changed to defense position at the end of the battle phase and its position cannot be changed until your next turn except with a card effect. If this monster is destroyed in defense position after being switched to defense position because of its own effect. You take direct damage equal to the ATK of the monster that destroyed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 Also: [b][quote]This monster cannot be Special Summoned except by sending the above monsters from your side of the field to the Graveyard (You do not use Polymerization). [/b]Once per turn you can Special Summon a Dragon type monster from your hand or graveyard or you can tribute a Dragon type monster on your side of the field to have this monster gain ATK equal to the ATK of the tributed monster until the end phase of your opponents next turn. If this monster attacks after activating its effect it is changed to defense position at the end of the battle phase and its position cannot be changed until your next turn except with a card effect. If this monster is destroyed in defense position after being switched to defense position because of its own effect. You take direct damage equal to the ATK of the monster that destroyed it.[/quote] Isn't that Polymerization anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [center][center]I guess I will correct your OCG:[/center][/center] [center][center]"This monster cannot be Special Summoned except by sending the above monsters you control to the graveyard (You do not use "Polymerization"). Once per turn: Special Summon a Dragon-Type monster from your hand or graveyard OR you can Tribute 1 Dragon-Type monster you control; Increase the ATK of this card by the ATK of the Tributed monster, until your opponent's End Phase. If this card attacks during the turn this effect is activated: Change it to Defense Position at the end of the Battle Phase. If this card is destroyed while in Defense Position: Take damage equal to the ATK of the monster that destroyed it."[/center][/center] [center][center]The card effect part is un-necassary. A monster cannot change battle positions manually after attacking.[/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Everburning Flame Posted August 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 Not every card is meant to annihilate everything. Sometimes its all in the combination and the strategy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [quote name='Therrion' timestamp='1312864790' post='5426782'] 1. Playability: 8/10 2. Creativity: 7/10 3. Name 2/5 4. Pic: 5/5 [/quote] 1. Get out, you're terrible. 2. BEWD + REBD is original. I HAVE SEEN EVERYTHING, BUT I AIN'T SEEN NO ELEPHANT FLY. 3. Rating on names is stupid, has nothing to do with the card. 4. Rating on pics is stupid, has nothing to do with the card. OT: Card is bad. Send from the side of the field means, pretty much, only Disaster Dragon would have any hope, and, even then, why would you? Special Summon effect - Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon does it better. Tribute Effect - Absolutely unneeded, especially considering it is in EXCHANGE for a Special Summon. And the CHANGE TO DEFENSE restriction, paired up with the increase until your opponent ends... Is stupid ._. In fact, if you keep this effect, remove changing it to DEF. 3000/0 is laughable, considering you gave up a 2400 and a 3000 ATK monster for it. Somewhat redeemed by Revival effect. Damage to self-effect - NO ONE RUNS BLACK-FEATHER DRAGON. This effect is terrible, and makes a bad card even worse, especially switching to DEF. Remove this. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [center][center]1) Explain to me why you assume without knowing?[/center][/center] [center][center]2) Thats nice. I happen to not care. I didn't say it wasn't original.[/center][/center] [center][center]3) Name rating is stupid, I just use Mr. Striker's rating system. Personally, I don't care for the Name/Pic rating.[/center][/center] [center][center]I agree with all else you said. And obviously vice versa as you repeated the fact that having Blue-Eyes and Red-Eyes on the field is more preferable.[/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 1. This card isn'tplayable in the slightest. 2. You in fact said it was original. And please, don't say the effect is, cause, it's not. It's a mishmash of Terra Firma, King Dragun, Goblins Attack Force, and a bit more. 3. ... YOU TRUST STRIKER? I mean, I'm fine with the dude, but... No, just no. Trust me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [center][center]1) I know it isn't really playable, it is nice to mercy some people. I like to sugar coat that of new comers.[/center][/center] [center][center]2) I never said anything of the sort.[/center][/center] [center][center]3) It doesn't require trust to copy/paste a rating system out of someone's signature.[/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Everburning Flame Posted August 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 I was trying to recall the effect of Goblin Attack Force to incorporate into the card. This card is meant for a combination. Also gona change the ATK gain to your end phase, pointless if until end of opponents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 1. Sugar Coating = Bad. Beign nice and sugar coating are different. 2. 7/10 originality. It disagrees. 3. ... It requires trusting that they know what they are doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [quote name='Ravenous Black' timestamp='1312866137' post='5426863'] 1. This card isn'tplayable in the slightest. [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [quote name='The Everburning Flame' timestamp='1312866320' post='5426877'] I was trying to recall the effect of Goblin Attack Force to incorporate into the card. This card is meant for a combination. Also gona change the ATK gain to your end phase, pointless if until end of opponents. [/quote] Remove the Attack Force part, not the keeping ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [center][center]1) Fine, I was being nice.[/center][/center] [center][center]2) 7/10 CREATIVITY. Use the word I use or I will not know what you mean. Which was also false.[/center][/center] [center][center]3) I trust I know what I am doing. That is enough for me. It is pretty much what I used to use as a rating system anyways.[/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 If someone asks, I got my scale from Rio. Anyway, card is bad. Reasons have been stated. Name and image is rated on how it all relates to each other, attribute, and type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [quote name='Therrion' timestamp='1312866604' post='5426891'][center][center]3) I trust I know what I am doing. [/quote] like half of the RC clowns on here? [/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [center][center]I have got to many negative remarks on that part. (I knew what it was there for)[/center][/center] [center][center]So I will no longer have it in there. >,> Damn babies[/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [quote name='Therrion' timestamp='1312867028' post='5426903'] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center]I have got to many negative remarks on that part. (I knew what it was there for) [/center][/center] [center][center] [/center][/center] [center][center]So I will no longer have it in there. >,> Damn babies [/quote] You might want to make two of those categories 15 if you want to do that. Your choice for which ones.[/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 [center][center]I was thinking of that, but considered ?/10 good enough for each, I will just be more strict with it.[/center][/center] [center][center]And now since I know I get judged for my Ratings by people of which do not own the card I am rating, I will also go beast on new-bies XD (jk)[/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 9, 2011 Report Share Posted August 9, 2011 "If this monster attacks after activating its effect it is changed to defense position at the end of the battle phase and its position cannot be changed until your next turn except with a card effect. If this monster is destroyed in defense position you take direct damage equal to the ATK of the monster that destroyed it. " <---this makes it WAY too easy to burn yourself you should have given this higher than 0 def, like 2000 def or more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.