Jump to content

Card Advantage is for the ignorant


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Ghost Knight of Jackal + Horn of the Phantom Beast = +3 every time you attack.

I don't care, because it's not a consistently good deck. But, even that said, card advantage is a fundamental part of Yu-Gi-Oh! But there's about 300 other things that matter too, so card advantage is not exactly the most important thing.

Ser actually seems not to be trolling today, and he raises a good point. How do decks basically beat other decks?

All (meaning most) decks try to win. They can do this by:

- An alternate win condition
- Life Points to 0
- Deck-out

For the first: Making themselves win < Trying to stop their opponent from winning
For the second: Making themslves win = Trying to stop their opponent from winning
For the third: Making themselves win > Trying to stop their opponent from wining

There are exceptions, but that's a basic formula. Even OTK decks will follow it. They try to make themselves win, that's the main purpose, but they have to make sure that their opponent doesn't OTK them first or something like that.

Of course, there's about 300 other things, so that reminds me on finishing my theory on Yu-Gi-Oh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Dr. Cakey-chan' timestamp='1317559290' post='5554767']
1. Premise: Card advantage is good.
2. List situational combo that grants mass +'s.
3. Combo is not used.
4. Conclusion: Card advantage is not important.

11/10 logic
[/quote]

Mine was obviously not situational. Just not Tier 1 or 2.

And, of course, card advantage is important, just that it's not the only thing. Otherwise, we could easily assume that JackalHorn.dek would be Tier 1. But it's not, so there is obviously other factors apart from card advantage.

The point is, what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I accept card advantage is something to consider, but I suppose I can do better in a duel with a Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon on the field than an Ojamagic or Thunder Dragon on the hand. Of course, once you think you are about to win, you don't really pay much attention to your hand, except when something requires you to discard...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here, how about an apt metaphor:

The guy with the largest army wins.

Is that always true? No. But if I had to pick between 300 Spartans and several thousand Persian troops, I'd go with the Persians. Why? [i]Because they won[/i].

To summarize the summary of the summary, card advantage does not decide the duel on its own, but it is the most important [i]single[/i] factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decks like Machinas, 6Sams, etc need to maintain a few cards in hand.

[quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1317528000' post='5554286']
Does anyone remember when we used to LIKE Mage?
[/quote]

Heathen! Mage is Jesus. That's how he keeps coming back after the [s]Jews[/s] mods [s]ban[/s] crucify him. He dies for our sins, and descends from the Heavens anew, continuing his path of righteousness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='~King Crouton~' timestamp='1317607748' post='5556654']
Heathen! Mage is Jesus. That's how he keeps coming back after the [s]Jews[/s] mods [s]ban[/s] crucify him. He dies for our sins, and descends from the Heavens anew, continuing his path of righteousness.
[/quote]
Wait...if mage is Jesus, then Ser is god and I'm the holy spirit, because they are essentially one.

I'm just not doing much because I'm a very busy holy spirit :<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Card Advantage is a numerical, logical way of sizing up a card. Advantage should always be taken into account - if the card is a -2, then it has to have a very useful effect to justify the advantage it pisses away; if it is a +1 then it has to have a cripplingly bad effect (or the advantage gained is very exclusive, for example a card that only lets you add a certain monster to your hand or something along those lines).

To assess cards based solely on advantage gained or lost is silly, but used as a part of the reviewing/decision-making process advantage is a rather good indicator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...