guuu1234 Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 A spur of the moment card. Enjoy. [img]http://img607.imageshack.us/img607/2558/215456a.jpg[/img] Lore: Pay Life Points so that you only have 100 left. Special Summon 1 monster from your Graveyard. A monster Special Summoned by this card is unaffected by all other cards and effect's, Until the End Phase. Cards and effect's cannot be activated until the effect of this card resolves completely. You cannot Summon or Set another monster(s) during the turn you activate this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 First off, let me provide you with a quick little OCG fix: Activate only while you control no cards, have no cards in your hand, and your opponent controls at least 1 monster. Pay Life Points until you have 100: Special Summon 1 monster from your Graveyard. A monster Special Summoned by this card is unaffected by all other cards and effect's until the End Phase. All effects cannot be activated until this card's effect resolves. This card worries me a little bit. Yes, the Life Points can be a big hindering factor, but I see this as an amazingly deadly card, especially late game. If your opponent is somewhat vulnerable, this card could cause an OTK. Essentially, this is a Monster Reborn that can't be chained to, and while Monster Reborn is a bad card for the game, I can kinda see this card falling under the same boat as Monster Reborn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 The card is all just bad card design all together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guuu1234 Posted December 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 thanks a lot for the OCG fix I will edit it soon. Do you have a link that expains the differece between ":" and ";" OT: I fiured that would be to much, but this card is hard to use, andi figured the heavy cost wll make up for it. I may make it a one turn monster, if i get the same response from others.T [quote] The card is all just bad card design all together. [/quote] If you're going to call it a completely bad card, state what is bad about it (Besides the picture) and why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='guuu1234' timestamp='1324517341' post='5722096'] thanks a lot for the OCG fix I will edit it soon. Do you have a link that expains the differece between ":" and ";" OT: I fiured that would be to much, but this card is hard to use, andi figured the heavy cost wll make up for it. I may make it a one turn monster, if i get the same response from others. T If you're going to call it a completely bad card, state what is bad about it (Besides the picture) and why. [/quote] As I previously stated, this card is essentially a Monster Reborn that cannot be chain to, making it bad card design and broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guuu1234 Posted December 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 Well if that's the problem, then will keeping the monster on the field for a turn at leas balance it out? or adding in a summon restrction (being able to only summon 1 monster for the rest of the turn). That will stop an OTK. It's also doesn't have the flexibilty of monster reborn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='guuu1234' timestamp='1324517341' post='5722096'] If you're going to call it a completely bad card, state what is bad about it (Besides the picture) and why. [/quote] Allow me. The card is a combination of 2 bad factors: [b]1)[/b] It is too situational. A good card is available for the player to use in a consistent basis. Your card depends on you having an empty field and no hand, and on your opponent having monsters out. That alone will only be used when you are loosing. Then it depends on you top-decking it, which doesn't make up for something you are going to be able to pull a good persentage of the time. When it's not "not appearing", then it will usually be found as a dead card in your hand. [b]2)[/b] Card is a Monster Reborn that cannot be negated and makes the revived monster invencible for a turn. [b]Now[/b] in my opinion, the card is not broken. It's insane conditions prevent it from being truly abusable, and the monster's protection only lasts one turn, but THERE IS a problem with the conditions. It's too hard to do, to the point it's unreliable and wouldn't really be used because of this alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guuu1234 Posted December 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 As alwas thanks for the review. If it was less situational, it would be broken. If it was more situational. . .well it doesn't get anymore situational then that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='guuu1234' timestamp='1324518916' post='5722198'] As alwas thanks for the review. If it was less situational, it would be broken. If it was more situational. . .well it doesn't get anymore situational then that. [/quote] Monster Reborn is used pretty much just for recovering some ground in the game. Your card is essentially a more situational Monster Reborn, which is far from broken in my opinion (despite the general opinion here). I think you could get away with lowering the difficulty of the conditions just a little and see what happens. Also if it helps, I like the pic. It's a Llama after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guuu1234 Posted December 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 ehhh I'll change it around and see where it goes. but i do warn, I'm keeping the Cost and the no negation part at least. Thanks or the though Ajack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='guuu1234' timestamp='1324521093' post='5722314'] ehhh I'll change it around and see where it goes. but i do warn, I'm keeping the Cost and the no negation part at least. Thanks or the though Ajack [/quote] Yeah you can keep those costs, they aren't a problem. Just the conditions is.. and no problem ;D For a moment you got me scared there. I thought you meant the llama pic when you said you'd change it around xD then I kept reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guuu1234 Posted December 22, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 Naw that llama has swag :/ EDIT: Changed the effect, not situational at all but the cost and new restrictions will make a player hesistate using this early game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 Way too risky at 100 LP left you're gambling everything on the card you're summoning and that's not even bypassing the summoning conditions or anything like that not to mention effect immunity for 1 turn, well that's not worth paying so much LP for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 1) Take banworthy card. 2) Give it a couple of extra buffs. 3) Make it so that it pretty much makes you lose if it doesn't make you immediately win. 4) Obtain badly-designed card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1324535871' post='5722800'] Way too risky at 100 LP left you're gambling everything on the card you're summoning and that's not even bypassing the summoning conditions or anything like that not to mention effect immunity for 1 turn, well that's not worth paying so much LP for [/quote] Crab, I say you ban rag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='Darkplant - FEAR' timestamp='1324537314' post='5722825'] Crab, I say you ban rag. [/quote] I'm quite tempted. Do we have a site rule against being absolutely awful at this game and giving terrible suggestions in every single thread? Because we really should have such a rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gimmepie Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 This card is worrying. The concept of it is good but the actual effect and mechanics of the card are vastly OPed and hugely risky. It wouldn't be worth running this card in any deck unless you can guarantee you a win (which I doubt), your better of with reborn. I do love the pic though, why... it contains a llama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NumberCruncher Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='Crab Helmet' timestamp='1324537207' post='5722823'] 1) Take banworthy card. 2) Give it a couple of extra buffs. 3) Make it so that it pretty much makes you lose if it doesn't make you immediately win. 4) Obtain badly-designed card. [/quote] 5) ... 6) Profit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='Crab Helmet' timestamp='1324537791' post='5722833'] I'm quite tempted. Do we have a site rule against being absolutely awful at this game and giving terrible suggestions in every single thread? Because we really should have such a rule. [/quote] I'm pretty sure you can consider his posts as spam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catterjune Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 [quote name='Crab Helmet' timestamp='1324537791' post='5722833'] I'm quite tempted. Do we have a site rule against being absolutely awful at this game and giving terrible suggestions in every single thread? Because we really should have such a rule. [/quote] Apparently not, since Icy and Mik don't even like handing out warn increases for broken rules, if I recall correctly. As for rules against being terrible, that's only in TCG. Like lol,gamefaqs, I consider it falls under trolling (specifically, presenting false information as true). But on an actual constructive note: I pretty much agree with Crab here. S/he explained it in a rather concise manner so I feel there is little else I need to add. The card's just poorly designed and boldly uninteresting. It doesn't really do much that we don't see a bunch of other cards do (revive from grave). There's no particular reason to use it, unless you'd straight up win the game shortly there after. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan Alda Posted December 22, 2011 Report Share Posted December 22, 2011 Interesting image aside, I agree with the others; this is not a good card. So what if this leaves me with only 100 LP left? I can just summon whatever I damn well please and do whatever with it. It doesn't matter how high the cost is; an effect like that is too powerful. That's not strategy, that's cheating. Due to the card's poor grammar, it's difficult for me to read to begin with. I'll try to fix that grammar: [i][b][color=#5A5A5A][font=tahoma, helvetica, arial, sans-serif][size=3]Pay Life Points so that you only have 100 left. Special Summon 1 monster from your Graveyard. A monster Special Summoned by this card is unaffected by all other cards and effects until your End Phase. Cards and effects cannot be activated until the effect of this card resolves completely. You cannot Summon or Set another monster(s) during the turn you activate this card.[/size][/font][/color][/b][/i] Even then, I can't guarantee the grammar is correct. Suffice it to say, you're not going anywhere with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.