Blake Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 [quote name='EmpoleMew' timestamp='1329145634' post='5814597'] So I guess the trend of all Numbers with a multiple of 10 belonging to Kaito has officially been broken now. Needs a nerf. [/quote] It's BEEN broken ._. Black Corn didn't and Doesn't belong to Kaito Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 What is the point of this card? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecha Love Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Destroy just about everything, inflict damage to your opponent and get close to/win the duel? Does there have to be another [i]point?[/i] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 [quote name='Charlotte The Witch' timestamp='1329145767' post='5814602'] What is the point of this card? [/quote] ... Seriously, are you really this inept still? WAN TAAN KIRA I know that's not kill, that's killer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoRWBY65 Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 [quote name='Jord200' timestamp='1329145600' post='5814596'] Good lord..... This thing is Giant Killer on sterioids..... This WILL get nerfed. Its just pure evil. [/quote] I was thinking a delayed Chaos Emperor Dragon on Steroids Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 [quote name='Relius Clover' timestamp='1329145826' post='5814604'] ... Seriously, are you really this inept still? WAN TAAN KIRA I know that's not kill, that's killer [/quote] I meant "what is the reason that this card exists?" Why do we need ANOTHER Gimmick Puppet Xyz Monster? Especially with such a stupid effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecha Love Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 [quote name='Charlotte The Witch' timestamp='1329146367' post='5814614'] I meant "what is the reason that this card exists?" Why do we need ANOTHER Gimmick Puppet Xyz Monster? Especially with such a stupid effect? [/quote] We don't know O_o It's Konami, what can I say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmpoleMew Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 [quote name='Relius Clover' timestamp='1329145717' post='5814601'] It's BEEN broken ._. Black Corn didn't and Doesn't belong to Kaito [/quote] That was only one of the mediums though. Hence why breaking it in both "officially" breaks the trend. Or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 WHAT THE FLYING f***... Rank 8 death trap... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Gimmick Puppets have [i]another[/i] Number? [size=5][b]DAMN IT ZEXAL[/b][/size] [img]http://gametechmods.com/uploads/images/72393YUNO.jpg[/img] [size=5][b]Y U DO THIS!?[/b][/size] Though TBH, it actually looks pretty good. Now if they released the rest of the Gimmick Puppets..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 This is probably one of the 2 unconfirmed Xyz for GAOV, considering the fact that Killer is coming out as a Promo, they just didn't want to spoil it, I'm guessing. Well, 5 days until we KNOW, max Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 What's wrong with Numbers belonging to other archetypes? It's not like the signers don't have an Archfiend (is Rose already considered an archetype?). As long as there is not a lot of abusable support for them, they can belong to as many archetypes as they want. Just not T.G. Wind-up Phantom Beast Infernity Rabbit, please. Also, this is cool and if released without changes, I'll run it in my extra, even if I have to use Scrap Dragon as a material. Is there a Number that is not generic IRL, other than Number C39 (who can be generic if it wants anyways)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 [quote name='Relius Clover' timestamp='1329150129' post='5814660'] This is probably one of the 2 unconfirmed Xyz for GAOV, considering the fact that Killer is coming out as a Promo, they just didn't want to spoil it, I'm guessing. Well, 5 days until we KNOW, max [/quote] Full spoiler of GAOV should be up this week :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 [quote name='-Berserker-' timestamp='1329151704' post='5814711'] What's wrong with Numbers belonging to other archetypes? It's not like the signers don't have an Archfiend (is Rose already considered an archetype?). As long as there is not a lot of abusable support for them, they can belong to as many archetypes as they want. Just not T.G. Wind-up Phantom Beast Infernity Rabbit, please. Also, this is cool and if released without changes, I'll run it in my extra, even if I have to use Scrap Dragon as a material. Is there a Number that is not generic IRL, other than Number C39 (who can be generic if it wants anyways)? [/quote] How does it make sense that intergalactical cards happen to be grouped in with cards that are already made without even the thought of those numbers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 [quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1329152266' post='5814730'] How does it make sense that intergalactical cards happen to be grouped in with cards that are already made without even the thought of those numbers? [/quote] It's because they adapt to those who touch them as said with Gold Rat and Galaxy Queen. 83 is, indirectly, part of the DD Esper Sparrow series. It's based on Fuya/Nelson's.... Oedipus complex. As such, 15 directly reflects IV's personality: A sadistic murderer that doesn't look it at first. It also went into the cards he uses because of it. IV must have touched a second Number card before someone else touched it, thus adding another card to his archetype. Considering the cards base themselves on the user/who they are/apparently what they use, it makes sense for them to leech onto the archetypes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 [quote name='Evil Tristan' timestamp='1329152266' post='5814730'] How does it make sense that intergalactical cards happen to be grouped in with cards that are already made without even the thought of those numbers? [/quote] Because the groups are formed just by something as unimportant otherwise as the name? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 My only problem with 15 and 40 being Gimmick Puppets is...what was IV's boss and the point of Gimmick Puppets as a deck before the Numbers? That's the main thing bothering me about this. When the archetype seems catered to summoning the Number, it really becomes a bit illogical to believe the archetype even existed before the Number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 [quote name='White Void - Hakumen' timestamp='1329152790' post='5814748'] My only problem with 15 and 40 being Gimmick Puppets is...what was IV's boss and the point of Gimmick Puppets as a deck before the Numbers? That's the main thing bothering me about this. When the archetype seems catered to summoning the Number, it really becomes a bit illogical to believe the archetype even existed before the Number. [/quote] Pretty much this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premier Alexander Romanov Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 [quote name='White Void - Hakumen' timestamp='1329152790' post='5814748'] My only problem with 15 and 40 being Gimmick Puppets is...what was IV's boss and the point of Gimmick Puppets as a deck before the Numbers? That's the main thing bothering me about this. When the archetype seems catered to summoning the Number, it really becomes a bit illogical to believe the archetype even existed before the Number. [/quote] Thirded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 I also am annoyed by how Numbers seem to be drifting towards genuine archetypes. Number 12 was an Armor Ninja, but the Ninja archetype existed long before Numbers, the Armor Ninjas just made a workable theme. Then Number 15 was a Gimmick Puppet, which I'll let by with a scowl. Then Number 33 was an OOParts...this is getting annoying. Then IV drops Number 40, which is ALSO a Gimmick Puppet. Where exactly are they getting these Numbers? I was under the impression that most people collecting Numbers got them from other people, excluding their first, which then would already have their forms decided. But III and IV evidently PERSONALLY gained 3 blank Numbers out of an estimated 6 or 7 in their family's possession, counting Number 32. As for Number 40's effect...WTF? We can foresee a huge nerf in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeal Ascendant Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7wJ8pE2qKU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNo.101 S.H. Death Knight Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Well this is certainly gonna get on my case of the fact they're intertwined by 2 names. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 0_0 [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTc9sLmOR0A"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTc9sLmOR0A[/url] Why did Konami copy an overkill technique from Final Fantasy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 Except Masshu Maq was the one with the meteor attack... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted February 13, 2012 Report Share Posted February 13, 2012 [quote name='Dragon Sage Ω' timestamp='1329168399' post='5815168'] Except Masshu Maq was the one with the meteor attack... [/quote] Except that it wasn't a meteor in that video, it was a Super Nova. It would have been a Super Nova that would have hit at the end phase if Kaito didn't go NGEPD that turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.