Jump to content

Chaos Dragons: The Deck


Recommended Posts

[quote name='Aggro' timestamp='1337888669' post='5946215']
I highly doubt you were playing the competitive build.
[/quote]
And how exactly is that relevant? I might not be playing the best build, but I knew they had potential and wanted to experiment. People like you who just mindlessly dismiss something without any real reason aside from the fact that it isn't in the top meta are what's killing innovation in the game. And that's besides the point. People need to be less conceited and more respectful of each other, especially to newcomers who aren't as familiar with the game as some older players. That seems to be an especially big problem around here, and your openly jerkass behavior of dismissing me without knowing anything about me isn't helping. With all due respect, I highly doubt you're qualified as an expert on what's competitive just because you've net decked a few top lists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='AsianGuy1137' timestamp='1337977911' post='5946884']
And how exactly is that relevant? I might not be playing the best build, but I knew they had potential and wanted to experiment.
[/quote]

So, you're saying you didn't think of the deck, because how could you if you didn't run it the way it currently is?

That's like me saying "I invented Dark Worlds as a deck, but I ran Into the Void and triple Dark World Lightning, BUT I STILL INVENTED IT!!!!!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Chris' timestamp='1337986199' post='5946991']
So, you're saying you didn't think of the deck, because how could you if you didn't run it the way it currently is?
That's like me saying "I invented Dark Worlds as a deck, but I ran Into the Void and triple Dark World Lightning, BUT I STILL INVENTED IT!!!!!!"
[/quote]
Hes clearly a hipster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1337987111' post='5947004']
Hes clearly a hipster.
[/quote]
[img]http://r17.imgfast.net/users/1716/41/17/74/avatars/26-13.png[/img]

Does not approve >=

Anyways, I dislike the deck because LS engine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1337987355' post='5947007']
[img]http://r17.imgfast.net/users/1716/41/17/74/avatars/26-13.png[/img]

Does not approve >=

Anyways, I dislike the deck because LS engine.
[/quote]

I don't think it really needs it to be honest. I use a half assed version of the Deck and it still pulls wins out of its ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Judgment Dragon' timestamp='1337993392' post='5947053']
I don't think it really needs it to be honest. I use a half assed version of the Deck and it still pulls wins out of its ass.[/quote]
As I mentioned to Black on DN, the deck runs the same concept as Gallis.
You derp around the whole game, then use your whole hand to summon a bunch of monsters for game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Judgment Dragon' timestamp='1338004472' post='5947128']
Yep. It seems that way.[/quote]
I mean, it feeds off the Graveyard, so why not?

[quote name='Judgment Dragon' timestamp='1338004472' post='5947128'] Your sig is funny as **** btw.[/quote]
It's actually pretty accurate.
Duel tends to end with Lightpulsar, Darkflare, [i]at least[/i] 2 Darkness Metals, and then some random bonus monster.
I only included Luster because its so rage-inducing, and likely to be an early-game topdeck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1338005103' post='5947135']
I mean, it feeds off the Graveyard, so why not?


It's actually pretty accurate.
Duel tends to end with Lightpulsar, Darkflare, [i]at least[/i] 2 Darkness Metals, and then some random bonus monster.
I only included Luster because its so rage-inducing, and likely to be an early-game topdeck.
[/quote]My two FTKs against Canadian today ended like that... with the same 3 cards to open with... yeah, DN sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, Armz, your sig's not accurate because the deck doesn't care about whether they have TT, Dark Hole, Veiler, Warning, Judgment, the like. If anything the latter 2 are just extra damage on the board, and the first 3 far from stop them going off.

Just thought I'd point that out since that, and having an amazing Rabbit matchup, is basically the deck's selling point. (And it's also cheaper than most decks)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Chris' timestamp='1338028762' post='5947225']
Actually, Armz, your sig's not accurate because the deck doesn't care about whether they have TT, Dark Hole, Veiler, Warning, Judgment, the like.[/quote]
No, I just meant they have no real way of stopping you. Since Pulsar just recovers the whole thing.

[quote name='Chris' timestamp='1338028762' post='5947225']And it's also cheaper than most decks[/quote]
Yea, Machinas were like that too.
The structure deck came out, you could buy 3, and then build something meta-winning from just those cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...