Zadures [Single]

[Galkin]

[img]http://i.imgur.com/BYN1g.jpg[/img]
[quote]This card cannot be Special Summoned. If this card destroys an opponent's monster by battle: inflict 2500 damage to your opponent's Life Points and increase your Life Points by 2500.[/quote]
This card adds injury to injury, then insult.

[Ire]

I love the picture of the card, but there isn't the "reference" (I don't know what is the word in english.....).
Nice effect ^^

[Garthfunkle Vii Backwards]

WAY TOO OP'ed

summon this activate ojama token attack ojama token with this your opponent lose 2500 plus 300 due to ojama trio eff you gain 2500 life points thats 5000 lp difference in just one attack

REPEAT OP'ed

[Galkin]

OPed? This card is a 2 tribute that cannot be Special Summoned, which in today's meta, is a massive restriction. To top it off, it has a low attack by level 8 standards meaning it will take plenty of resources to summon and it can easily be defeated, costing you a lot. That Ojama token combo takes time to perform since you'll need the trap set first and tribute summon Zadures.

You're better off performing the Aztec OTK than trying to pull this off which is nowhere near an OTK. If this card is oped, Stone Statue of the Aztecs is banworthy.

[Garthfunkle Vii Backwards]

[quote name='Galkin' timestamp='1341324837' post='5966289']
OPed? This card is a 2 tribute that cannot be Special Summoned, which in today's meta, is a massive restriction. To top it off, it has a low attack by level 8 standards meaning it will take plenty of resources to summon and it can easily be defeated, costing you a lot. That Ojama token combo takes time to perform since you'll need the trap set first and tribute summon Zadures.

You're better off performing the Aztec OTK than trying to pull this off which is nowhere near an OTK. If this card is oped, Stone Statue of the Aztecs is banworthy.
[/quote]

what part of 5000lp difference in one attack do you not understand

plus quickplay spell card like shrink doesnt help

[宇佐見 蓮子@C94]

OP'd? No. This thing lives in a diffrent era from our own, an era where Tele-DAD is the best deck out there. The summoning restrictions and crappy ATK makes it near useless in the current meta. The burn is nice and all, but life points barely matter now in the format where people only care about attacking. Maybe I'll give it an 8/10 2 years ago but right now, I'll give it a modest 4,6 out of 10. Since the card is so outdated and slow and weak.

[Garthfunkle Vii Backwards]

[quote name='Dread☆プロイセン' timestamp='1341356122' post='5966648']
OP'd? No. This thing lives in a diffrent era from our own, an era where Tele-DAD is the best deck out there. The summoning restrictions and crappy ATK makes it near useless in the current meta. The burn is nice and all, but life points barely matter now in the format where people only care about attacking. Maybe I'll give it an 8/10 2 years ago but right now, I'll give it a modest 4,6 out of 10. Since the card is so outdated and slow and weak.
[/quote]

Mausoleum of the Emperor a mere 2000lp payment loophole around that then shrink and or ojama trio plus other cards etc 5000 is big now 3000 not as munch

if he/she/ro-bit reduce it to 1500 burn and 1500 gain for a 3000 difference i would feel better

[Zexiontwo]

I agree a bit with both of them. It is overpowered just a bit in its burn and gain effect. However, it's summoning and ATK would not help in most duels this day and time.

[AGATHODAIMON BANGTAIL COW]

2500 is a reasonable amount for a card that isn't easily playable, even if it has Mausoleum of the Emperor to bring it out. In fact, Mausoleum and Frogs are practically the only reasonable way this card will even hit the field in the first place.

And the 2500 healing is nice, but nothing to freak out over. In addition to staying alive a bit, it really only helps Agent Saturn decks, which suck anyway.

[Garthfunkle Vii Backwards]

2000 lp gain and 1000 lp burn ?

[Sander]

[quote name='Herman The German' timestamp='1341357061' post='5966660']
Mausoleum of the Emperor a mere 2000lp payment loophole around that then shrink and or ojama trio plus other cards etc 5000 is big now 3000 not as munch

if he/she/ro-bit reduce it to 1500 burn and 1500 gain for a 3000 difference i would feel better
[/quote]

The burn doesn't do s***, how hard is it to understand? Oh boo hoo, it can make some crappy plays with cards like Shrink or Ojama Trio, wah wah wah. Get the picture already, Shrink is bad, and Ojama Trio is bad outside from burn decks.

[Garthfunkle Vii Backwards]

and you wouldn't put this in a burn deck ? 5000 lp each time it attack and destroy a monster is alot

[DARKPLANT RISING]

I am honestly going to PM Koko about banning Herman for uber stupidity.

On topic: ATK and DEF should become 2800. Wouldn't hurt either way, and 2500 is way too low to be used.

[Alpakha]

Herman you waaaaay to over reactive. It's hard to otk with this card unless you have a dedicated deck and even so it would be hard.

[Love of Ghibli]

[quote name='Herman The German' timestamp='1341386799' post='5967003']
and you wouldn't put this in a burn deck ? 5000 lp each time it attack and destroy a monster is alot
[/quote]

NO YOU WOULDN'T!! Its inception is meant for super mega casual play where you drop it over a Hardened Armed Dragon on 12 year olds with their random hero decks because Jaden rocks. No seriously we live in a format where there are only two kinds of duelist those who have lifepoints and those who don't. These lifepoint effects mean nothing.

Btw I agree with venom for a level 8 the lowest attack it should have is 2700 (Hyperion and Grapha)

[DARKPLANT RISING]

You could even consider 3000, given 3000 + 2500x2 = 8000. And this needs something like that to beat up Hino-Kagu-Tsuchi (which has a similar activation condition).

[Galkin]

I raised the ATK and DEF to 2900. It can run over a couple more commonly known cards.

[DARKPLANT RISING]

Thought several times, it should be 3000.

[Master White]

Well, its not overpowered, yet its overpowered at the same time. Which according to you all which makes it balance, I used to make cards like that, and yet was commented it was overpowered, even though it was baclanced by the vary same method as this card is. Well, anyhow, I see this being abused majorly.....Reason is the fact about the type of deck I forget its name, where any card effect hurts your Life Points is now increasing the Life Points...About the only fact is, I'd say it'd be abused hence why I don't like its effect all that much.


7.7

[Just Crouton]

Card is meh. The 2500 burn gives incentive to play this double-Tributer that can't Special Summon itself through a built-in effect. Far from broken, and hard to abuse because of the "can't be SS'd" clause.

This card reminds me of [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Darkness_Destroyer"]Darkness Destroyer[/url], and personally, I'd rather have the 2300 double-attacking piercer over this 2900 ATK 2500 burner. But, I refuse to be lazy to leave it at that like a jerk, so...

Judging it as a Darkness Destroyer, the 2500 burn isn't broken at all for its stats and whatnot. It's not game-breaking, can only be activated by running over monsters, and an OTK seems very unlikely. You could make it into a double attacker with Evil HERO Infernal Gainer, which sounds like a bad idea for a card to run, but...WAIT A MINUTE! A suggestion I could make for this card is to make it an Evil HERO monster. As an Evil HERO, you can search it with Stratos, which then can be used to make Dark Gaia or Malicious Fiend. You can also TS it with Infernal Prodigy and draw a card.

Other than that, this is a casual card that needs a dedicated deck to get it out.