Canadian Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Both at 2 for some reason. [center][img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110422062850/yugioh/images/thumb/8/88/BottomlessTrapHoleSDDL-EN-C-1E.jpg/300px-BottomlessTrapHoleSDDL-EN-C-1E.jpg[/img][img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120621222243/yugioh/images/thumb/b/b1/SolemnWarning-CT08-EN-SR-LE.png/300px-SolemnWarning-CT08-EN-SR-LE.png[/img][/center] [center]You have only enough space left for one of them (which you play in 2's). Which do you run and why?[/center] [center]More and more, I've been finding myself playing BTH for many reasons. What does YCM think?[/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpectralMaliceX Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Bottomless Trap Hole, it doesn't cost me 2000 life points to clear a monster, then it removes said monster meaning my opp has 1 less luster target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='Canadian' timestamp='1343748056' post='5993536'] Both at 2 for some reason. [center][img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110422062850/yugioh/images/thumb/8/88/BottomlessTrapHoleSDDL-EN-C-1E.jpg/300px-BottomlessTrapHoleSDDL-EN-C-1E.jpg[/img][img]http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20120621222243/yugioh/images/thumb/b/b1/SolemnWarning-CT08-EN-SR-LE.png/300px-SolemnWarning-CT08-EN-SR-LE.png[/img][/center] [center]You have only enough space left for one of them (which you play in 2's). Which do you run and why?[/center] [/quote] Torrential Tribute Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Crouton Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Solemn Warning. Monsters with 1400- ATK don't get under it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 For the most part, you're not making space for them, since they're already in your deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Warning is more likely to be topdecked, so.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted July 31, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 If Leviair didn't exist, BTH would seem a lot more sexier as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Warning doesn't let the Extra Deck monsters it kills be Summoned back, doesn't have minimum ATK range, is a Counter, and it also stops the card that's doing the "Summoning" effect. Bottomless banishes stuff, is cost-free, can get multiple targets under certain sircumstances (mainly Rabbit this format), and the ATK minimum doesn't really matter all that much when you want your opponent to get rid of his/her field pressence so you can destroy the end-result. Each go with it's pros and cons. I'm more of a "bottomless" fan here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Citrine Serpent Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 IRL bottomless because I already have them and I'm too cheap, there isn't enough difference, and I don't play in tournaments enough to warrant buying solemns at $6+ each ._. On DN I play solemn because it is marginally better most of the time, but they both have their pros and cons. I'm bad at HEROs but they usually run both, don't they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Solemn because it can't be interrupted by lance/spark/anyotherthing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Both, awks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 For a serious answer, 2000 LP isn't exacty something to throw away when OTKs and near OTKs are all over, so I like Bottomless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='Expelsword - 黎明' timestamp='1343756599' post='5993608'] For a serious answer, 2000 LP isn't exacty something to throw away when OTKs and near OTKs are all over, so I like Bottomless. [/quote] Pfft, if they have an OTK primed, you were going to lose anyway, with or without that extra 2000 Life Points. It's not technically an OTK if they don't have 8000 points or more of damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 [quote name='.Rai' timestamp='1343756684' post='5993609'] It's not technically an OTK if they don't have 8000 points or more of damage. [/quote] Semantics. I've won the turn after someone played this because they had few enough LP for me to just overcomimt to the field for game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 I generally like Solemn better. It's harder to negate, it can be used in the Damage Step, and it doesn't let Stratos and the gang do their things. Plus it hits Macro Cosmos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 I'm a Warning fan. Bottomless lost its favor for me a while ago. Although I haven't really played since the Priority rule change which it most likely has gained favor, I've always liked watching an opponent do a few combos to make an Xyz or Synchro just to have that Synchro negated and left with nothing. I'm probably one of the few who actively (or inactively considering its been a while since I played last) use Divine Wrath in a lot of their decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 Back when Stardust was more of a staple than it is nowadays, Warning for sure. Nowadays with no priority and more people dedicating to Xyzs, it's a harder choice. Though, thinking about it, Warning works better against Maestroke, Zenmaines, and the like of self-protecting Xyzs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infinitysqrd Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 It really depends on the monster(s) being stopped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 I generally prefer Warning, due to it being able to stop anything I want and it not having restrictions. However, I will admit that drawing a late game Warning is more painful than drawing a late game Bottomless... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superdoopertrooper Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 I play 2 Warning's before I even think about BTH. BTH is a great card, but it doesn't have anywhere near the versatility or power of Warning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc. Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Depends on what situation. But at least Bottomless takes care of BLS, Quasar and other massive beatsticks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 [quote name='Doc.' timestamp='1343829885' post='5994387'] Depends on what situation. But at least Bottomless takes care of BLS, Quasar and other massive beatsticks. [/quote] Except Quasar can just negate BTH. Not that Quasar is relevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc. Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Still cripples massive beatsticks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superdoopertrooper Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 [quote name='Doc.' timestamp='1343831590' post='5994413'] Still cripples massive beatsticks. [/quote]Until you realise they just chained Lance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc. Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 [quote name='Superdoopertrooper' timestamp='1343834788' post='5994434'] Until you realise they just chained Lance. [/quote] Never seen someone chain Lance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.