Toffee. Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Lightning_Vortex [img]http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111008233849/yugioh/images/thumb/f/f3/LightningVortex-DLDI-EN-C-UE.jpg/300px-LightningVortex-DLDI-EN-C-UE.jpg[/img] [quote]Discard 1 card. Destroy all face-up monsters your opponent controls.[/quote] Wipe out the whole Inzektor Crew tada Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 Fableds. Sinister Serpant. 2 of the worst arguments for why this card is amazing like Raigeki. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmpoleMew Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 Eradicating Aerosol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 1, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 [quote name='Kevin the Bird' timestamp='1356998454' post='6107677'] Fableds.[/quote] Oh you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 This card was the s*** in the 2009 DS game. Hey, Jack Atlas, nice synchro monster ya got there. Wouldn't it be unfortunate if it were to be destro- BLAM! XD But it's not very good nowadays, especially with fire fists format coming up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunar Origins Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 This is one of the cards where I feel like the sheer destruction far outweighs that meager discard cost, but apparently it's not good just because. .-. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 1, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 [quote name='☆~Rin-chan~☆' timestamp='1356999140' post='6107706'] This is one of the cards where I feel like the sheer destruction far outweighs that meager discard cost, but apparently it's not good just because. .-. [/quote] Mostly- Because we have 2 Torrentials and Dark Hole, just as an example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchronized Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 Its not a bad card & never will be a bad card. You just don't need that much destruction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 It was cool back when Dark Hole wasn't a thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 I've always thought the image doesn't look like a vortex at all. Card is good > game's state functions with better than good effects. Eyup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 Ehh, the two are comparable, but both can be used for completely different situations. Dark Hole, while having absolutely no cost to play it, wipes out your own monsters as well. But then again, no one would be stupid enough to wipe out their own monster unless they were attempting to build off of that destroyed monster, a.k.a. overextending. Lightning Vortex, with it's discard and only able to wipe your opponent's field, might be used for a more defensive purpose rather than pushing for a game, as nine times out of ten, you're probably going to be ditching a dead card anyway, and not one that will help you OTK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted January 1, 2013 Report Share Posted January 1, 2013 Outclassed, mostly. Torrential is much better as a defensive card for obvious reasons and most decks that make gigantic pushes don't need this. The decks that don't make gigantic pushes, on the other hand, usually don't want to discard (or are extremely trap heavy, rendering this somewhat irrelevant). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.