Bull3tM0nk3y Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 Spell Draw 3 cards, then discard 2 cards. What would it do to the Meta if this card was set to 1? Dark Worlds would be unstoppable? Would Exodia Necross be a tier deck? Discuss. >Inb4hateonme Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 [quote] Let me write a haiku about the OP: No no no no no No no no no no no no No no no f*** no.[/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull3tM0nk3y Posted January 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 What a splendid haiku. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 The "discard" doesn't make its case any better. That, and it's overall pretty crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 It's not going to happen, f*** this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bull3tM0nk3y Posted January 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 What wonderful discussions going here. Now.. WILL SOMEONE PLEASE DISCUSS ABOUT THE GOD D#MN CARD?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 If this comes back......... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_vxMgiRPxw I play Dark Worlds and I don't want this back.... There is nothing Graceful about this card..... Its evil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 [quote name="Mønkey" post="6127706" timestamp="1358888563"]What wonderful discussions going here. Now.. [b]WILL SOMEONE PLEASE DISCUSS ABOUT THE GOD D#MN CARD?![/b][/quote] What's there to discuss? It's broken and shouldn't come back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Crouton Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 Would Exodia Necross be a tier deck? Why would an Exodia player run Necross if they can just win with Exodia? Why do people keep making topics on cards that will never come back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeguBrit Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 @Machismo because people think that the meta is so f***ing broken that bringing this stuff back won't make much of a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchronized Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 idk its a -2 so its not all that good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 [quote name="Zero*" post="6127718" timestamp="1358889326"]idk its a -2 so its not all that good[/quote] No, no, no, it's a +2. Bro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchronized Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 No, no, no, it's a +2. Bro. I'm not sure if you were being sarcastic or not but you're wrong either way. It's actually a +0, I was making a joke that was still more relevant than a topic that we've seen multiple times and always produces the same results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 No, I was being sarcastic. That and it actually is a +2 in DWs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchronized Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 No, I was being sarcastic. That and it actually is a +2 in DWs. I guess so. And in Fableds because discard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeguBrit Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 [quote name="Archlord Sora" post="6127729" timestamp="1358889694"]No, I was being sarcastic. That and it actually is a +2 in DWs.[/quote] I don't understand how it's not a +3. You're triggering effects and drawing a card as the end product. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 What a splendid haiku.Haiku senses, tingling!On-Topic: Don't we go over this every time we mention this card? It lacks sufficient restrictions/drawbacks, and is otherwise too idiotic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 [quote name="LeguBrit" post="6127733" timestamp="1358889846"]I don't understand how it's not a +3. You're triggering effects and drawing a card as the end product.[/quote] Well, in a normal context, it's a +0: You lose 1 card from hand because you're activating the spell card along with 2 more after you draw. So you end up with the same number of cards you had before you activated it. HOWEVER, in DWs, the -2 for using it becomes a +0 because you lose those cards from your hand, but they're instantly replaced via their effects. So, you lose 1 card from hand to play the spell and gain 3 cards from the effect, hence, it's a +2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 I don't understand how it's not a +3. You're triggering effects and drawing a card as the end product. Because, you lose Graceful Charity in the process. inb4NinjabecausepeoplekeepreplyingfasterthanItype Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 I guess so. And in Fableds because discard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 It's not just good in Darkworld guys... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 Seriously? A -3 to the deck that can be used in all decks. It's discard clause was created as a drawback, but now it's just setup, which is another bonus. There are strategies out there that just need a tiny little bit more brainless consistency injected in them to pass from unreliable to OTKs. This card's impact can only be negative. It'd do it's original intended purpose if it did something along the lines of: [b]Draw 3 cards. Then, discard 2 cards. Cards with the name of the discarded cards have their effect negated for the rest of the Duel. You can only activate 1 "Graceful Charity" per turn.[/b] (random idea) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Tigerwolf Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 Lol Graceful Charity: "Discard 2 cards: Draw 3 cards. You cannot add or draw additional cards for the rest of this turn. You can only activate 1 "Graceful Charity" per turn." Too bad this thing is just broken now. It'll most likely stay banned for a while, until Konami decides when the fuck it wants to bring it back to 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 "Discard 2 cards, then Draw 3 cards" seems like all you really need to do to it, that seems reasonably balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeguBrit Posted January 22, 2013 Report Share Posted January 22, 2013 Or they could say Discard 2 cards to draw 3 cards. You cannot draw any additional cards this turn. Now it's reversed to be so you need 2 or more other cards in your hand to use this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.