Alice Moonflowyr Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 www.yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Heavy_Storm Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master of Sabers Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 A necessary evil. Stay at 1, pls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 There's only one issue with this card, and it's more of an issue with a lot of other cards. But it's still an OTK enabler, so I'd rather see a replacement that punishes overextention whilst also not being an OTK enabler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judαs Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 1 is fine and 1 it will be. /thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 I agree with Agro that there needs to be a suitable replacement. Since Konami don't produce those too often, well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judαs Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 There's only one issue with this card, and it's more of an issue with a lot of other cards. But it's still an OTK enabler, so I'd rather see a replacement that punishes overextention whilst also not being an OTK enabler. Do you mean something like "If your opponent controls 3 or more set Spell/Trap cards: Discard/Pay; Destroy all S/T they control"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not-so-Radiant Arin Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 Do you mean something like "If your opponent controls 3 or more set Spell/Trap cards: Discard/Pay; Destroy all S/T they control"? "You cannot Special Summon..." Because that's all Heavy is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 "You cannot Special Summon..." Because that's all Heavy is.Basically, This.Drop Heavy -> Proceed to monster-spam -> Declare game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strider Tigerwolf Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 A Rouge Stardust Dragon has appeared! OT - Should stay at 1 until better replacement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 If you don't want to push, why not use Malevolent Catastrophe? Because by then it's too late to use your own Traps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 If you don't want to push, why not use Malevolent Catastrophe? Because by then it's too late to use your own Traps. Because decks like to be proactive instead of reactive. I'd rather not wait a turn for my opponent to attack instead of sitting there like a duck, at the mercy of warning, fiendish, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 The format would be fine without it, mainly because the decks of today have easier access to counter backrows than decks did back thenex: Gorilla, Marksman, Silvermountain, Zenmaines, Zenmaioh, Grapha, Hornet, Ryko and Lyla, Infestation Infection, Spellbook of Wisdom, Harpie'sHunting Ground (post tachyon)and the list goes onlet's also not forget that Night Beam, Forbidden Lance, and Mystical Space Typhoon exist at 3the only deck that really warrants Heavy's existence is Dino Rabbit, since they're currently the most threatening turn 1 set 5 deck in existence right now (considering how easily it can protect its backrows), which suggests that something should probably be done to it in conjunction with removing Storm from the game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted February 6, 2013 Report Share Posted February 6, 2013 So assuming Konami won't be hitting Rabbit because of Verz this format, next format, it could technically be argued for:Rabbit -> 0 (or, I guess Rabbit & TGU to 1)Heavy -> 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.