EmpoleMew Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 EARTH/Level 3/Beast 800/1500 I've seen two effects floating around and I don't know which one is the correct one. (Madolche Clause) When this card is Special Summoned, you can Special Summon 1 "Madolche" monster from your hand. This effect of "Madolche Chirpcolate" can only be activated once per turn. or (Madolche Clause) Once per turn, when a "Madolche" monster you control changes its battle position: Target 1 monster on the field; Change that target to face-up Defense Position, then if it was not a "Madolche" monster, it cannot attack and its effects are negated. I'd really like it to be the first one, but I'm inclined to believe it's the second one because it's so godawful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 A pseudo-Waffle cat that works with Mew and Hootcake would be pretty decent. The other effect is just ew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 It's too long to be the first one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 NAC says the latter and I see nothing about the first, sooooo... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 Not all Madols have to be busted, you know... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 [quote name="Illusory Black" post="6157544" timestamp="1362622595"]NAC says the latter and I see nothing about the first, sooooo...[/quote] But why would they do that? That'd make it literal shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 If it's the latter its suppose to combo with baaple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmpoleMew Posted March 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 Not all Madols have to be busted, you know... It's more fun if they are. But why would they do that? That'd make it literal shit. All promos can't be baby Incarnates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 [quote name="♥ D.A._Guyver I ♥" post="6157553" timestamp="1362623211"]If it's the latter its suppose to combo with baaple.[/quote] Baaple is literal shit. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 It's more fun if they are.Madols are like Wind-Ups, in the sense that only around 5 cards of the 20+ card archetype is ever really used, and those 5 alone make it into a busted deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 I honestly thought this was just Hootcake with a horrible TCG name..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 Madolches need a Rank 3 Xyz Monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted March 7, 2013 Report Share Posted March 7, 2013 I am happy this is not that good. Madolche's don't need any more OP'd cards ever since they were given Hootcake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 The problem is that the second effect is more or less useless. It would be hard to get both this and Baaple on the field to use its somewhat situational effect, and because Madolches have no great field swarming ability. It just becomes another useless card. I like that they are supporting Baaple though, but this thing is worthless. BTW, how much does a Madolche Deck cost? I might make one... maybe... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A._Sakuyamon Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 The problem is that the second effect is more or less useless. It would be hard to get both this and Baaple on the field to use its somewhat situational effect, and because Madolches have no great field swarming ability. It just becomes another useless card. I like that they are supporting Baaple though, but this thing is worthless. BTW, how much does a Madolche Deck cost? I might make one... maybe...Well, I know 3 mage and 3 tiera will run you about 60$( basing off EBay prices)? Everything else is pretty much dirt cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchronized Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 I mean it can change its own Battle Position. And under Chateau, it's got 2000 DEF. Might be a decent tech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 *turns it to def, removed the ability to attack and it's effects* *is called useless shit* what the hell are you people smoking, that would be a great effect, not that the deck would use the card cause everyone in the game is so spam happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 I am happy this is not that good. Madolche's don't need any more OP'd cards ever since they were given Hootcake. I mean, they [i]still[/i] don't do anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Love that darn art. How is it still a Beast though? Effect is good, but probably not that useful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 But why would they do that? That'd make it literal shit. While it may LOOK like shit, it may in fact just be chocolate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmpoleMew Posted March 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 *turns it to def, removed the ability to attack and it's effects* *is called useless shit* what the hell are you people smoking, that would be a great effect, not that the deck would use the card cause everyone in the game is so spam happy. last time I checked, useless means that something has no use, which this card doesn't it's clearly meant to have synergy with baaple but there's no realistic way to have this baaple on the field at the same time 2000 def under chateau doesn't mean shit, especially when baaple has 2300 and marmamaid has 2500 both of which are also shit in their own right why would I opt to keep my opponent's monster on the field with a negated effect and inability to attack instead of outright removing the problem altogether, which the deck is perfectly and easily capable of doing hell, the deck is even capable of making big eye so why would I jump through hoops to negate the opposing monster's effect when I can take it and use it for myself the card is shit While it may LOOK like shit, it may in fact just be chocolate. this made me laugh though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreelancerRaiko Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 I remember when people first said Madolches would be a useless archetype, now we're all surprised when they DON'T have a busted card. Oh the irony. XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Actually nobody said they were useless.And even if they did, it was when Madols first came out, and didn't have busted support yet.Derp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted March 8, 2013 Report Share Posted March 8, 2013 Only time I see the first eff being useful in a general regard is if the player draws into Mewl, Chirpcolate and Messengelato, OR if you have a Level 3 Madolche and summon it with Hootcake while having Gelato or Cruff in hand. Second eff there is just, "Why would Konami make this if they have already established a clear deck goal with a deck, yet they insist on making a card that doesn't help the goal out?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted March 9, 2013 Report Share Posted March 9, 2013 Funny thing is, the first effect isn't even that busted. It's just decent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.