Cute Rotten Yoshika Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 because im trying really fucking hard to get people to say "inb4 claire" whenever we talk about anything even remotely gimmick puppet related. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazooie Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 i tried that in the past, but it doesn't work claire OT: I actually really love this card. It isn't GOOD, but it sure has niches where it's amazingly cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Sorry, but the Gimmick Puppet inb4 was retired with Darkplant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Galaxy-Eyes is also reserved for Evilfusion. And Armadilloz has a whole bunch, like Chain Dog Chris has Grapha. There are probably others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Galaxy-Eyes is also reserved for Evilfusion. And Armadilloz has a whole bunch, like Chain Dog Chris has Grapha. There are probably others. fuck you too dave >= OT: The solid nature of this card has always bugged me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cute Rotten Yoshika Posted March 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 fuck you too dave >= OT: The solid nature of this card has always bugged me. no one could ever forget that youre fableds. trust me. anyways, mind elaborating on that last sentence a bit? it is 7am here and im not entirely grasping it. do you mean from a design point its just the right combination of factors to bug you? or something else...... unu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 I meant that the fact that it requires a Mono-type build bothers me. With Machines this is a much smaller concern, but a bother nonetheless. I just don't care for cards that are restricted like that, not even design standpoint, just in general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cute Rotten Yoshika Posted March 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 I meant that the fact that it requires a Mono-type build bothers me. With Machines this is a much smaller concern, but a bother nonetheless. I just don't care for cards that are restricted like that, not even design standpoint, just in general. ah gotcha. i prefer it slightly more over an archetype restriction (unless the archetype is multi-type, like constellar) just because it will always exist as a way to help new machine decks, for better or worse. but i completely understand that. its a bit obnoxious in some instances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Galaxy-Eyes is also reserved for Evilfusion.And Armadilloz has a whole bunch, like Chain DogChris has Grapha.There are probably others.*whistles*OT: Interesting for making rank 8's in General Machine decks if ran at 3, plus that effect to make an opponents ATK 0 makes up for its 100 ATK and DEF, still in general its good as a Machine General Rank 8 Tech which can also be generally used for Machina Fortress if need be based on what you use this card for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan Alda Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 I used to play Machine monotype before I switched to Legendary Ocean/Daedalus. This would have been a great "screw you" card back then. Semi-Nomi isn't much of a hassle in this case; no real cost, just the Graveyard requirement. If only there were more Rank 8 Machines... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Galaxy-Eyes is also reserved for Evilfusion. And Armadilloz has a whole bunch, like Chain Dog Chris has Grapha. There are probably others. :s, I thought we had something... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Galaxy-Eyes is also reserved for Evilfusion. And Armadilloz has a whole bunch, like Chain Dog Chris has Grapha. There are probably others. Lavals? Though they've kind of fallen out of favor since Cosmo Blazar... Either way, that's irrelevant. Is there some easy Machine way to get Machu Mech? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Lavals? Though they've kind of fallen out of favor since Cosmo Blazar... Either way, that's irrelevant. Is there some easy Machine way to get Machu Mech? Cyber Dragon works for 1/2 of the requirement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildflame Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Cyber Dragon works for 1/2 of the requirement. Instant Fusion could be the other half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 I meant that the fact that it requires a Mono-type build bothers me. With Machines this is a much smaller concern, but a bother nonetheless. I just don't care for cards that are restricted like that, not even design standpoint, just in general.Cuz' they figured a splashable make-anything-0-ATK would be crazy?Speaking of crazy- Shenanigans with This and Birdman; Oh god I love it <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Cuz' they figured a splashable make-anything-0-ATK would be crazy? Speaking of crazy- Shenanigans with This and Birdman; Oh god I love it <3 Or they could've added a cost, made it have some other restriction, etc.? Cards like this punish versatility when building a deck, and that irks me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Cards like this punish versatility when building a deck-How so?Limited Extra Deck? Lack of additional types?Though, it makes as much sense as running Solidarity, or using a deck that consists of, basically, 1 type(Fire Fists, Incarnates, etc) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Fire Fists can/potentially do run Burner and Blaster. Incarnates use things like Drago-SAC for LaDD. Solidarity is also a card that bothers me because it basically says that you can't maximize the potential of having a deck + Extra, or you compromise the cards that require only X kind of cards by drawing a card that depended on that mono-X after you had to move past it andor not run the versatility in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 17, 2013 Report Share Posted March 17, 2013 Fire Fists can/potentially do run Burner and Blaster. Incarnates use things like Drago-SAC for LaDD.I didn't mean literally 1 type, I was just saying in general the deck is primarily 1 type.Solidarity is also a card that bothers me because it basically says that you can't maximize the potential of having a deck + Extra, or you compromise the cards that require only X kind of cards by drawing a card that depended on that mono-X after you had to move past it andor not run the versatility in the first place.I see.Though, to be fair, Bronk's deck was all Machine, and we didn't really get anything Clockwork Counter-related. So they had to give it some kind of goofy rework regardless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.