Infernity Break

[Blake]

 

It can win so many games. I mean, the only one with a "cost" is the first one, the others just nom on each other, and it's basically free removal.

[Azuh]

Unfairnities

[Wildflame]

I dislike Barrier more.

[Kingdom Xathers]

At the very least, it needs a reprint, just so we can tell if the second sentence is a cost or and effect.

[Toffee.]

"Infernity" card

Oh Konami, your so silly...

[Kingdom Xathers]

[quote name="Armadilloz" post="6183837" timestamp="1366337969"]Oh Konami, your so silly...[/quote] Well, heck, I didn't even see that part. That just gives them further range than they know what to do with.

[Airride]

At the very least, it needs a reprint, just so we can tell if the second sentence is a cost or and effect.

The first is the condition, the second SHOULD be a cost. I could check with WC11 but...eh.

[Zauls]

I don't play Infernities any more but I liked this card a lot when I did. Always run 2.

[evilfusion]

Infernity Break is not a cost. It targets an Infernity card in your Graveyard and a card your opponent controls. When it resolves, it banishes the card in your Graveyard and destroys the other target.

 

But it could use a reprint so PSCT makes this clear. The way it's printed now is way too ambiguous, since it says to select and banish. Then destroy. If it was a cost, it'd say "remove from play TO select one card and destroy it", and it does say to "select an Infernity card" in your Grave, which is similar to targeting. But yeah...so hard to interpret. I only can tell the difference because I looked up the ruling. Both TCG and OCG say it targets 2 cards.