Zazubat Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 Found this card, looks interesting, a SS only Deck could have fun with this. It screws with something like Rescue Rabbit that's for sure. I wish Demise of the Land worked on Normals as well, then this could combo with it (thinking about it, maybe it couldn't. Anybody knows if that would be possible or not?) Constellar and Evilswarm will hate this, that's for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 Triggers Fortune Lady Light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 Fortune Lady Light D.D. Destroyer Dark Dessertapir Asla Piscu (just like the show) It has pros and cons about not Special Summoning the monster back. It helps nomis not be wothless so, it's alright, but it also doesn't trigger Psychics, that just came to mind.... until I told myself "wait, what am I even thinking?". Overall it's really a solid card with fun plays. I loved using Fortune Lady Firey. Needs a reprint. I don't think I've seen it in a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cute Rotten Yoshika Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 the main issue with this card is that its not disruptive enough. who uses normal summons anymore, the phrase goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 the main issue with this card is that its not disruptive enough. who uses normal summons anymore, the phrase goes. Who uses Normals? Why, who doesn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 Who uses Normals? Why, who doesn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 you also presented 2 brokens archetypes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerion Brightflame Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 you also presented 2 brokens archetypes. If you remove Judgement from Spellbooks, they become acceptable levels of broken. I.E. last format meta at best. OT: Winning a game by NS Light and then going to into Lady Fire is a fun feeling. But yeah, as has been said, it doesn't work as a disruption card anymore, because Nobody NS's anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 you also presented 2 brokens archetypes. Your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 If you remove Judgement from Spellbooks, they become acceptable levels of broken. I.E. last format meta at best. OT: Winning a game by NS Light and then going to into Lady Fire is a fun feeling. But yeah, as has been said, it doesn't work as a disruption card anymore, because Nobody NS's anymore. Saying nothing Normal Summons is pretty presumptuous. Your point? My point being that cards with effects like that are stupid, and shouldn't be the way the game is played, but Konami doesn't give a fuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerion Brightflame Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 Saying nothing Normal Summons is pretty presumptuous. My point being that cards with effects like that are stupid, and shouldn't be the way the game is played, but Konami doesn't give a fuck. Fine nothing majorly relevant Normal Summons, or cares if there normal summon gets stunned, and neither are Fortune Ladies quick enough to kill you in the time interval this spell would give you. Also yes, we all know that. He was pointing out that nothing majorly relevant Normal Summons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 With this, I could play Monarchs in my Skill-less deck. Summon a monarch, activate it's effect, this is chained, this resolves and banishes the monarch by the point the monster's effect resolves, so Skill Drain doesn't negate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 Fine nothing majorly relevant Normal Summons, or cares if there normal summon gets stunned, and neither are Fortune Ladies quick enough to kill you in the time interval this spell would give you. Also yes, we all know that. He was pointing out that nothing majorly relevant Normal Summons. If that's your opinion, then so be it, but saying nothing Normals is stupid, since that's not the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 If that's your opinion, then so be it, but saying nothing Normals is stupid, since that's not the case. My post was in response to your responding to claire's post that "Who doesn't normal summon?", claire saying that nothing relevant normal summons anymore. This portion of discussion was supposed to be about how this card has lost its relevance in a format that barely normal summons, but you took it out of context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 My post was in response to your responding to claire's post that "Who doesn't normal summon?", claire saying that nothing relevant normal summons anymore. This portion of discussion was supposed to be about how this card has lost its relevance in a format that barely normal summons, but you took it out of context. sure what ever, I don't feel like arguing more today, you people win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cute Rotten Yoshika Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 the main issue with this card is that its not disruptive enough. who uses normal summons anymore, the phrase goes. this means that my statement was said with an amount of irreverence and was not to be taken at 100% face value (though it is still a correct statement about our current game). so chill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zazubat Posted April 20, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 this means that my statement was said with an amount of irreverence and was not to be taken at 100% face value (though it is still a correct statement about our current game). so chill. What do you mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 What do you mean? She's saying that she acknowledges that her statement was a generalization and is likely to have exceptions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cute Rotten Yoshika Posted April 20, 2013 Report Share Posted April 20, 2013 im also telling you to calm down because there is literally no reason for you to be getting riled up over this. anyways future visions is really cool and one of my favorite cards just on a conceptual level. sadly it isnt useful. also future visions stun.dek sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.