X-Metaman Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 Fiend/DARK 1000 ATK/1000 DEF 4 Level 3 DARK monsters Cannot be destroyed by battle except with "Number" monsters. When this card would be destroyed by battle and sent to the Graveyard, battle damage you take from that battle is also inflicted to your opponent If this card is Xyz Summoned by Ranking Up "Number 96: Dark Mist", it gains this effect. Once per battle, during either player's turn, when an attack is declared involving this card and an opponent's monster: You can detach 1 Xyz Material from this card; decrease that monster's ATK to 0, and if you do, this card gains that same amount of ATK. Discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dementuo Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 Somehow I knew this effect would involve reducing the ATK to 0. But... holy sh*t that art. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 My god, that art. Is it really worth the effort, though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proto Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 MY INSECTS. But not worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mido9 Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 I just cant make out a thing in the art. At all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 I just cant make out a thing in the art. At all. Now consider the fact that this is going to be the cover card… But honestly, this is currently Weiss levels of bad cover cards. I can't blame them, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aerion Brightflame Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 Yeah pretty much everyone could guess the rank-up effect. It's kinda obvious. It's kinda meh as is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 It's worded incorrectly right now, I believe. It would have to say something like "decrease that monster's attack to 0" and not "its ATK becomes 0", followed by a bit more text. Anyways, it's pretty much just a stronger version of its previous self. There's nothing new. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 It's artwork is absolutely amazing =DThe effect is cool, since its basically a trollish version of its existing self. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmpoleMew Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 I'm seeing arguments over whether the effect is when the card battles period, or if it's only when it attacks. The difference would determine whether this card is good or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 I'm seeing arguments over whether the effect is when the card battles period, or if it's only when it attacks. The difference would determine whether this card is good or not. Well, for some reason, 96 didn't actually use that effect, which if he had, he would have won the duel. Hm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 I'm seeing arguments over whether the effect is when the card battles period, or if it's only when it attacks. The difference would determine whether this card is good or not. >Either player's turn, at attack declaration. Not gonna lie, that art is badass tbh. Well, for some reason, 96 didn't actually use that effect, which if he had, he would have won the duel. Hm. Obvs he didn't, just so the plot can advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 Well, for some reason, 96 didn't actually use that effect, which if he had, he would have won the duel. Hm. >Either player's turn. This be pretty strange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmpoleMew Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 >Either player's turn, at attack declaration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 Oooh, so the effect in the OP was wrong then. This be pretty strange. It is, though in X-Metaman's defense the iniitial translation was the only translation at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 The anime should have made its Material orb thingies be cheaply-edited Honest renders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-Metaman Posted May 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 Oooh, so the effect in the OP was wrong then. It is, though in X-Metaman's defense the iniitial translation was the only translation at the time. Real life Number 96 effect: このカードが相手モンスターと戦闘を行う攻撃宣言時に1度、このカードのエクシーズ素材を1つ取り除いて発動できる。 Anime Number C96 effect: このカードが相手モンスターと戦闘を行う攻撃宣言時に1度、このカードのエクシーズ素材1つを取り除いて発動する事ができる。 Anime C96 Japanese text is exactly the same as the regular number 96, so it should have same text. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 Real life Number 96 effect: このカードが相手モンスターと戦闘を行う攻撃宣言時に1度、このカードのエクシーズ素材を1つ取り除いて発動できる。 Anime Number C96 effect: このカードが相手モンスターと戦闘を行う攻撃宣言時に1度、このカードのエクシーズ素材1つを取り除いて発動する事ができる。 Anime C96 Japanese text is exactly the same as the regular number 96, so it should have same text. Ooooh, so it's a case of the wikia eff being wrong then. Suck on that lolwikia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airride Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 I want to play with this. It looks so silly~ Being able to use it 4 times and make it enormous and just steamroll everything seems fun, especially with Safe Zone and stuff to protect it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 Frogs can use Rank-Up Magic now! Because they'd also get Number 65/C65. Its effect when destroyed by battle makes no sense in the context it was used. Well, it sort of does, but if it was written that way in the real game, you'd lose before its effect to return the damage back would apply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 Where's the effect negation though D: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted May 5, 2013 Report Share Posted May 5, 2013 Where's the effect negation though D: inb4C96.5DarkStormNegater Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted May 6, 2013 Report Share Posted May 6, 2013 inb4C96.5DarkStormNegater Dark Mist doesn't need it, considering he still has 65. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted May 8, 2013 Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 Well I don't think this effect is unexpected for anyone, but it is pretty cool. It's a reason to run a RUM besides LVF, it becomes an absolute BEAST after a couple battles (hence its animalistic form), and... yeah, I like it. Frogs can use Rank-Up Magic now! Because they'd also get Number 65/C65. Its effect when destroyed by battle makes no sense in the context it was used. Well, it sort of does, but if it was written that way in the real game, you'd lose before its effect to return the damage back would apply. Personally, I think in the OCG it would be changed to more of: "If you take Battle Damage from battles involving this card, your opponent takes that damage as well." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cute Rotten Yoshika Posted May 8, 2013 Report Share Posted May 8, 2013 Well I don't think this effect is unexpected for anyone, but it is pretty cool. It's a reason to run a RUM besides LVF, it becomes an absolute BEAST after a couple battles (hence its animalistic form), and... yeah, I like it. Personally, I think in the OCG it would be changed to more of: "If you take Battle Damage from battles involving this card, your opponent takes that damage as well." itll likely just be changed to something like the relinquished text which would be something like "When you take Battle Damage from battles involving this card: Inflict an equal amount of damage to your opponent." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.