Jord200 Posted May 17, 2013 Report Share Posted May 17, 2013 Cannot be Normal Summoned unless you control a "Ghostrick" monster (but can be Normal Set). Once per turn: You can change this card to face-down Defense Position. When this card is destroyed by battle and sent to the Graveyard: You can change the monster that destroyed it to face-down Defense Position. That monster's battle position cannot be changed. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted May 17, 2013 Report Share Posted May 17, 2013 That art is so damn adorable. :W Heh, nice flavor with monsters being "frozen". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted May 17, 2013 Report Share Posted May 17, 2013 Heh, nice flavor with monsters being "frozen".I know, right? Basically stuck in Face-down Defense position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Doodle Posted May 17, 2013 Report Share Posted May 17, 2013 That art is so damn adorable. :W Heh, nice flavor with monsters being "frozen". Didn't think of it this way :o Also I didn't notice it's permanent. It's better than I thought :O And it's searchable with Apprentice Magician. Just thought I'd throw that out there :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aix Posted May 17, 2013 Report Share Posted May 17, 2013 [spoiler='So the art is based off of this, cuz Yuki-onna in legends don't have scarves.'][/spoiler] It appears to be really slow though. Imagine if that were a Flip Effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted May 17, 2013 Report Share Posted May 17, 2013 It seems absolutely awful. It goes completely against the goal of the deck and is slow as hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Doodle Posted May 17, 2013 Report Share Posted May 17, 2013 Correct me if I'm wrong, but the whole deck seems slow. But I see the point, this is going a little bit against the other support they have and requires more than the others do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted May 17, 2013 Report Share Posted May 17, 2013 It seems absolutely awful. It goes completely against the goal of the deck and is slow as hell. What is the deck goal anyways? I haven't given these guys much of a look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cute Rotten Yoshika Posted May 17, 2013 Report Share Posted May 17, 2013 What is the deck goal anyways? I haven't given these guys much of a look. combination of house and your lil trick pals to directly attack the opponent, using stuff like witch and alucard to take card of problem cards as they arise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmpoleMew Posted May 17, 2013 Report Share Posted May 17, 2013 What is the deck goal anyways? I haven't given these guys much of a look. lose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted May 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted May 17, 2013 Now now. I'm sure they are like Madolche. They mad no win condition and her simply half a deck before they got Tiaramisu, Hootcake, Ticket, and Messengelato. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted May 17, 2013 Report Share Posted May 17, 2013 Now now. I'm sure they are like Madolche. They mad no win condition and her simply half a deck before they got Tiaramisu, Hootcake, Ticket, and Messengelato. The very problem with using this logic is that it's the logic used that deems this card as bad for the deck. It'll focus around House, which this card is in conflict with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.