Expelsword Posted August 21, 2013 Report Share Posted August 21, 2013 I looked at the new list(s) and I didn't see this card. Given the recent rise of FIRE, I really expected it to disappear. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVo0N7pXNQs My reaction is somewhere in there^ Throw as many cards from your Extra Deck on to the field as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted August 21, 2013 Report Share Posted August 21, 2013 Keep in mind we're getting another list in January now, so it may die then. OT: even with a one per turn clause it's absurdly overpowered, limits card design, and promotes degenerate plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mido9 Posted August 21, 2013 Report Share Posted August 21, 2013 limits card design more like promotes konami to make more things that break it, since lavals and fire.dek came after Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted August 22, 2013 Report Share Posted August 22, 2013 You do know that Gold Sarc was hit, which was a popular way to search this card out right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted August 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2013 You do know that Gold Sarc was hit, which was a popular way to search this card out right? I actually didn't. But that doesn't solve the problem, now does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepperyena Posted August 22, 2013 Report Share Posted August 22, 2013 Ah, the joys of a first-turn 3-card quasar with Lavals. I know this card is infamous, but I can't help but love it. I'm always on the lookout for fire-types with 200 DEF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northern Sage Posted August 22, 2013 Report Share Posted August 22, 2013 Absurd card that takes advantage of an archetype with unholy amounts of graveyard control on par with some DARK decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted August 22, 2013 Report Share Posted August 22, 2013 I actually didn't. But that doesn't solve the problem, now does it? It doesn't, but that also dropped a bit of the Deck's consistency as well, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabber2033 Posted August 22, 2013 Report Share Posted August 22, 2013 I think they expected this to be played in 3-Axis. With Spirit now at 1, the deck is pretty much dead, so it won't see as much play, therefore, no need to touch it. At least that's what I think they were thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sora1499 Posted August 22, 2013 Report Share Posted August 22, 2013 EVERYONE PLAY LAVALS. Naw, jk. There are better things to play than lavals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted August 22, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 22, 2013 EVERYONE PLAY LAVALS. Naw, jk. There are better things to play than lavals. Heresy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbbgenius Posted August 23, 2013 Report Share Posted August 23, 2013 I don't get the Youtube video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted August 23, 2013 Report Share Posted August 23, 2013 Heresy. Yeah, I'd rather play something different rather than Quasar Lavals, as I can pretty much imagine what the people playing it look like when they're playing with the deck: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted August 24, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 You don't NEED Quasar to win, but... style points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 Am surprised Konami didn't hit this for the TCG banlist for either 1 or 0 when it can produce so many Synchro's to overwhelm the opponent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.