Jump to content

Madolche Anjelly


Recommended Posts

S2CB0oz.jpg?1

 

 

Madolche Anjelly
Level 4 EARTH Fairy-Type Effect Monster
ATK 1000
DEF 1000
When this card in your possession is destroyed by your opponent’s card (either by battle or by effect) and sent to your Graveyard: Shuffle this card into the Deck. You can Tribute this card; Special Summon 1 “Madolche” monster from your Deck. It cannot be destroyed by battle and is shuffled into your Deck during your next End Phase. You can only use the effect of “Madolche Angelly” once per turn.

 

http://ygorganization.com/vj-dec-21-2013/

 

The new Madolche from Primal Origin.  She's pretty good I have to say.  A basic play off the top of my head is that you can Special Summon her with Mewfeuille's effect, Tribute her, Special Summon Hootcake from your Deck, use Hootcake's effect, and then Special Summon Messengelato to search a Madolche Spell/Trap. Then, you overlay Hootcake and Mewfeuille into Invoker, and then ultimately bring out Tiaramisu.  So what do you think of this card?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And a lot of people in other places started screaming on the thought of Madolche as a meta deck. Me, I think they all just jelly of Anjelly. Veiler weakness of Mew is a pain though. (Though, I seriously despise the fact that konami blantatly made the deck into Tiaraspam.dek. I hope there'll be a good madolche S/T in PRIO).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hootcake is already too good; this just removes Madolche's set-up phase. Anjelly into Hoot into Gelato into Ticket is a +1 even after Hoot flies away.

 

this won't end well

but you can give it a whirl

 

and madolche's gonna leave you

 

beaten by a little girl

 

(I hate that part of the song)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno. I like the deck-thinning potential, I'm just caught up by how space in the deck works.

All the guys who teched the weirdest possible stuff (y'know, like Redox) can come on out and tell me how you're putting Anjelly in your builds, but I'm still trying to decide how to reorient my own build, since it appears I might not need Instant Fusion anymore to compensate for the lack of a Hootcake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Rawk" post="6322251" timestamp="1387312073"]I dunno. I like the deck-thinning potential, I'm just caught up by how space in the deck works. All the guys who teched the weirdest possible stuff (y'know, like Redox) can come on out and tell me how you're putting Anjelly in your builds, but I'm still trying to decide how to reorient my own build, since it appears I might not need Instant Fusion anymore to compensate for the lack of a Hootcake.[/quote] Of course everyone's gonna be running this dude. It's crazy good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course everyone's gonna be running this dude. It's crazy good.

 

Well, until people learn to Veiler the Hootcake, thus setting the combo play back unless you have something like Instant Fusion.

 

S'why I have a minor problem with this card. Unless people are honestly going to start teching Puddingcess, which would be totally fine in my opinion, there's literally only one play that people are going to want to use this card for, which is to immediately grab Hootcake. And while nobody's holding up Veiler 100% of the time, you're always going to have to worry about whether or not you can go for it as long as your opponent has cards in their hand.

 

I guess, by that same logic, you could argue that you could always fear Solemn Warning/Dark Bribe on Instant Fusion or Double Summon (depending on the circumstance), but it's because I think both should end up being in the deck that I'm having trouble justifying the use of this card, unless one were to start cutting Magieleines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Pchi" post="6322363" timestamp="1387319399"]You mean "this chick". Why gamers must always be sexist and refer to the characters as male, even if it's perfectly clear they're female?[/quote] Meant to say: 'this, dude.', as in addressing Rawk as 'dude'. I'm also not a gamer, and even if I were my comment would hardly be sexist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This card...will be interesting. It's literally a Lonefire Blossom for Madolches. I may be a player of the Madolche deck for years, and while it's welcome support, this worries me to an extent. Now, hear me out. Madolches are my favorite deck, and always have been since I started playing it a year ago, and will be until the Deck is no longer viable. Now I'll be the first to admit that I wasn't playing Madolches since their inception, when Puddingcess was the boss monster and Ticket, Messengelato, Hootcake, and Tiaramisu were nonexistant. The deck was just bad then. But then when Abyss Rising came out, I guess you could say I hopped on the bandwagon. That said, the deck still wasn't the most consistent deck in the world. That all said and done, I like to not consider myself a bandwagoner Madolche player, not even knowing of the Deck before Tiaramisu, and I'd like to think myself dedicated to the Deck, as I play a mono-EARTH Psychic Madolche deck before all others. And one of the things that really pulled me towards this deck was that it was a really nice balance to the meta, that it wasn't something that you expected to see dominating the meta; it wasn't topping very often, and it was often considered one of the "dark horse" decks that just went under the radar. I feared we'd lose that distinction when Madolche Hootcake became a monster, but much to our luck, it didn't seem to do much, though the deck had gotten much stronger and began to pose a real threat to the main Decks of the game.

 

With the release of this card, and the decimation of Dragon Rulers as the dominant archetype, I fear that it's impossible for Madolche to stay under the radar anymore. It may just be similar fears of people jumping on the Madolche train and make the Deck appear OP, but at the same time, as more people play it, the more people will feel like they need to side against it. The prevalence of Angelly-Hootcake plays, Ticket plays, and even Puddingcess plays will start to come to the limelight even more as the masses start to play the Deck. Will Madolches be Tier 1? I still doubt it to an extent; but it's definitely earned its Tier 2, or even Tier 1.5, status. And that's what scares me; it'll be difficult to play the Deck once people start siding heavily against them, throwing things like Macro Cosmos/D-Fissure, Rivalry of Warlords, Skill Drain, or even Summon Limit. It'll become necessary to clog the Madolche deck with 3 MSTs. Furthermore, I see Konami hitting cards that are in our front lines to balance out the Deck. I welcome the support, and it's quite good, but it wasn't needed. Madolches had what they needed to survive in a decent meta; Angelly might have propelled us to the top, but unfortunately it's a long drop from the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...