Goose Posted September 1, 2014 Report Share Posted September 1, 2014 because "blue-eyes white dragons" isn't a card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atypical-Abbie Posted September 1, 2014 Report Share Posted September 1, 2014 Oh Konami...Well anyway, it's a nice enough card, but I feel like it is kind of situational. Destroying all monsters is good, but I could also just run over them. It also hurts that Pendulums are like "whatever bro, we'll just come back next turn, and as you can't attack, you just kind of wasted a card". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted September 1, 2014 Report Share Posted September 1, 2014 Heh, it's a typo. Someone missed the memo that the plural of "card name" is still just "card name". This card is nice for Blue-Eyes in general, which is usually absurdly easy to spam out with various effects, but I don't think it really is needed. Conditional removal at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
(GigaDrillBreaker) Posted September 1, 2014 Report Share Posted September 1, 2014 Yeah. Even though blue-eyes is relevant, this still isn't, as it takes away the best pat of BEWD: 3000 ATK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atypical-Abbie Posted September 1, 2014 Report Share Posted September 1, 2014 Heh, it's a typo. Someone missed the memo that the plural of "card name" is still just "card name". Don't they just put an s after the quotation mark? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Max Posted September 1, 2014 Report Share Posted September 1, 2014 Wouldn't this be effective in DDT? Pretty much a Raigeki three times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goose Posted September 1, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 1, 2014 Wouldn't this be effective in DDT? Pretty much a Raigeki three times. useless when you draw it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted September 1, 2014 Report Share Posted September 1, 2014 Don't they just put an s after the quotation mark? They could, but aesthetically, it looks awful. "Blue-Eyes White Dragon"s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atypical-Abbie Posted September 1, 2014 Report Share Posted September 1, 2014 They could, but aesthetically, it looks awful. "Blue-Eyes White Dragon"s Eh, the (s) thing they typically do. I remember seeing it on a card, can't remember which though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted September 2, 2014 Report Share Posted September 2, 2014 Heh, it's a typo. Someone missed the memo that the plural of "card name" is still just "card name". I wanna say it's not a typo because they did the same thing with Cyber Dragon support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.