CLG Klavier Posted September 29, 2014 Report Share Posted September 29, 2014 This archetype is so cute >< But it kinda irks me that by the end of the entire chain, you're left with a level 3 and level 4 on field you can do nothing with (assuming Hootcake and Messengelato). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted September 29, 2014 Report Share Posted September 29, 2014 Spirit Beasts feel like the new Madolche, just like they felt like the new Gusto. Difference with Madols is that they ended up going off the deep end with design, and it worries me that the, at present, teetering design but weak Spirit Beasts have this coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Max Posted September 29, 2014 Report Share Posted September 29, 2014 Yeah, that's pretty much my play. Anjelly Tribute into Hootcake and SS Messengelato for a Spell or Trap (Usually Chateau or Ticket) Interesting thing to note is the last part of the effect, has caught quite a few people off guard when I have to explain to them that the SS'd monster cannot be destroyed in battle. But yeah... The Madolche Archetype as a whole is pretty Degenerate and you need to build a Deck around it to even make them usable. Anjelly should ALWAYS be run at 3 though. Her effect is just too good. Also the Art is adorable.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted September 29, 2014 Report Share Posted September 29, 2014 Spirit Beasts feel like the new Madolche, just like they felt like the new Gusto. Difference with Madols is that they ended up going off the deep end with design, and it worries me that the, at present, teetering design but weak Spirit Beasts have this coming.To be fair... That's what happens when you forfeit the (intended) player interaction that Gustos have, and go with a more direct route that enables the toolboxing upon stuff hitting the field, like with what Madols ended up being. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted September 29, 2014 Report Share Posted September 29, 2014 Am I missing something? Do people not start with Mewfeuille to make Invoker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Max Posted September 29, 2014 Report Share Posted September 29, 2014 Am I missing something? Do people not start with Mewfeuille to make Invoker? Anjelly is usually more of a safer option considering you can get Hootcake out from the get go (if it is not in your hand of course) Also there is the Not Destroyed by Battle thing which is nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maeriberii Haan Posted September 30, 2014 Report Share Posted September 30, 2014 It kind of saddens me about what Madolche ended up being. Back then Queen was problematic enough, but at least it -was- the only power play from a slow grind deck back then, however broken it is (and everyone back then kept on trying to find inconsistent combos to spam her). Then Hootcake and Angelly geared the deck more towards Queen spam. But really, problematic card is problematic due to allowing Madolche to go into Queen more efficiently and consistently, but the deck's not relevant enough these days, thankfully. But really, even as a Madolche player, I kinda wish that we'll never get any support ever again, since it'll just either ends up shitty and unnecessary, or it'll make Queen even more powerful, and queen is already a huge mess as she is now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted September 30, 2014 Report Share Posted September 30, 2014 Anjelly is usually more of a safer option considering you can get Hootcake out from the get go (if it is not in your hand of course) Also there is the Not Destroyed by Battle thing which is nice. No he means: >Mew, Special Anjelly from hand >Angelly for Hootcake >Hootcake summon Messengelato from deck, search ticket >Hootcake and Mew for Invoker >Invoker summons another Messengelato (no effect of course) >Both Messengelatos for Tiaramisu >Tiara effect (you have hoot or mew from invoker in grave here) >Ticket effect >Continue bullshit Note this is from Mew and Anjelly in hand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted October 1, 2014 Report Share Posted October 1, 2014 What he said. Although I guess just Anjelly WOULD be "safer". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted October 1, 2014 Report Share Posted October 1, 2014 Why does Konami keep making lonefires? Didn't they learn their lesson with plants, initially? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted October 1, 2014 Report Share Posted October 1, 2014 Why does Konami keep making lonefires? Didn't they learn their lesson with plants, initially? They kinda did, seeing as how lonefire's advantages were 3 card deck thinning and pulling a big monster that stayed on the field, as well as being able to tribute other monsters besides itself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted October 2, 2014 Report Share Posted October 2, 2014 They kinda did, seeing as how lonefire's advantages were 3 card deck thinning and pulling a big monster that stayed on the field, as well as being able to tribute other monsters besides itself 3-card deck thin? This into Hoot into Messengelato into a Spell/Trap. Big Monster? Not directly, but acts as a stepping stone to Tiaramisu etc. Other Monsters? Fair enough, but it doesn't really need to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted October 5, 2014 Report Share Posted October 5, 2014 3-card deck thin? This into Hoot into Messengelato into a Spell/Trap. Big Monster? Not directly, but acts as a stepping stone to Tiaramisu etc. Other Monsters? Fair enough, but it doesn't really need to. The whole issue is just this thing's synergy with hootcake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.