The Dark One Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Except it is... And yay for Metal. Because in this format; spin>destruction? lol lol lol. Hmm, I keep thinking of things in terms of last format. I need to break that habit. Nevertheless, though Spin has weakened significantly, Removal is just setting your opponent up for a RftDD play for game. Obviously, Caius fits better into the present big decks, but I'm not certain which would be preferable, 1 for 1, when playing against your conventional DAD Return deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 I'd rather RFP Shogun/Grandmaster/DAD, but that could be me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted March 30, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Except it is... And yay for Metal. Because in this format; spin>destruction? lol lol lol. Hmm' date=' I keep thinking of things in terms of last format. I need to break that habit. Nevertheless, though Spin has weakened significantly, Removal is just setting your opponent up for a RftDD play for game. Obviously, Caius fits better into the present big decks, but I'm not certain which would be preferable, 1 for 1, when playing against your conventional DAD Return deck.[/quote'] Spin Dark Armed Dragon, or Remove it From Play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Except it is... And yay for Metal. Because in this format; spin>destruction? lol lol lol. Hmm' date=' I keep thinking of things in terms of last format. I need to break that habit. Nevertheless, though Spin has weakened significantly, Removal is just setting your opponent up for a RftDD play for game. Obviously, Caius fits better into the present big decks, but I'm not certain which would be preferable, 1 for 1, when playing against your conventional DAD Return deck.[/quote'] Spin Dark Armed Dragon, or Remove it From Play.DAD hits the field for game. If he doesn't make game when he hits the field, he's not needed anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted March 30, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Except it is... And yay for Metal. Because in this format; spin>destruction? lol lol lol. Hmm' date=' I keep thinking of things in terms of last format. I need to break that habit. Nevertheless, though Spin has weakened significantly, Removal is just setting your opponent up for a RftDD play for game. Obviously, Caius fits better into the present big decks, but I'm not certain which would be preferable, 1 for 1, when playing against your conventional DAD Return deck.[/quote'] Spin Dark Armed Dragon, or Remove it From Play.DAD hits the field for game. If he doesn't make game when he hits the field, he's not needed anyway. What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Except it is... And yay for Metal. Because in this format; spin>destruction? lol lol lol. Hmm' date=' I keep thinking of things in terms of last format. I need to break that habit. Nevertheless, though Spin has weakened significantly, Removal is just setting your opponent up for a RftDD play for game. Obviously, Caius fits better into the present big decks, but I'm not certain which would be preferable, 1 for 1, when playing against your conventional DAD Return deck.[/quote'] Spin Dark Armed Dragon, or Remove it From Play.DAD hits the field for game. If he doesn't make game when he hits the field, he's not needed anyway. What?:[ I misread what you said. But either way, Dark Armed Dragon only goes to the field to win the game. If someone summons him and doesn't win the game, then there's no reason for him being there anymore, so the person who played him wont care if you destroy him or whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Yeah, I guess you're right. 2800 ATK with destruction effect is pretty much useless for a player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 I believe his point was that you shouldn't take DAD into account when deciding which effect is superior, because he never hits the field unless the game is about to end. You'd never get the chance to Summon your Monarch of choice. That being said, if the situation did arise, Removing DAD is obviously far superior to Spinning him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 DAD isn't classified as OTK for a reason. It hits the field when the need arises, unlike DDT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 DAD isn't classified as OTK for a reason. It hits the field when the need arises' date=' unlike DDT.[/quote']A smart player saves a winning card for when it wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Raiza... because hes like... I can bloo wind at chu... and can do a sexy pose... i pwn Zaborg's afro and Caius's ball of energyz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 DAD isn't classified as OTK for a reason. It hits the field when the need arises' date=' unlike DDT.[/quote']A smart player saves a winning card for when it wins.That same smart player is willing to lose the game just to save from playing DAD? Then said smart player is bad player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 DAD isn't classified as OTK for a reason. It hits the field when the need arises' date=' unlike DDT.[/quote']A smart player saves a winning card for when it wins.That same smart player is willing to lose the game just to save from playing DAD? Then said smart player is bad player.You don't read posts, do you? Are you one of those people with the cord stuck in your head? Otherwise, you have no excuses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 A smart player saves a winning card for when it wins. I am seriously considering putting this in my Siggy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 DAD isn't classified as OTK for a reason. It hits the field when the need arises' date=' unlike DDT.[/quote']A smart player saves a winning card for when it wins.That same smart player is willing to lose the game just to save from playing DAD? Then said smart player is bad player.You don't read posts, do you? Are you one of those people with the cord stuck in your head? Otherwise, you have no excuses.Oh man, some harsh words from big bad Internet man. brb cutting myself I hear winning is possible when you've lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 DAD isn't classified as OTK for a reason. It hits the field when the need arises' date=' unlike DDT.[/quote']A smart player saves a winning card for when it wins.That same smart player is willing to lose the game just to save from playing DAD? Then said smart player is bad player.You don't read posts, do you? Are you one of those people with the cord stuck in your head? Otherwise, you have no excuses.Oh man, some harsh words from big bad Internet man. brb cutting myself I hear winning is possible when you've lost.I'm not trying to insult you. I'm just stating truths :[ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 DAD is played outside of game-winning turns. True on principle alone, lrn2logic plox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 If someone summons him and doesn't win the game, then there's no reason for him being there anymore, so the person who played him wont care if you destroy him or whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Yeah, I guess you're right. 2800 ATK with destruction effect is pretty much useless for a player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Would you care if you had a beatstick on your field while you have a winning hand that doesn't involve that monster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Because Monarchs are OTKs now right? Oh wait, or are you suggesting DDT splash Raiza/Caius? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Because Monarchs are OTKs now right? Oh wait' date=' or are you suggesting DDT splash Raiza/Caius?[/quote']You seem to be forgetting what we're talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 No, it seems you have. It's Raiza versus Caius. Granted, there were no specific mention as to the decks in which these cards belong, it should be rather obvious. No OTK is going to run Monarchs (if they do, Caius wins for it being DARK). Therefore, the assumed matchup is Monarchs vs said deck, but you seem to imply the Monarch user being OTK-esque with "a winning hand". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 I don't think I should continue. You have Alzheimer's :[ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted March 30, 2008 Report Share Posted March 30, 2008 Oh man, some harsh words from big bad Internet man. brb cutting myself I hear winning is possible when you've lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.