Moatman Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 Hello, this is my first attempt to make a card, hope you guys like it. The idea came from the concept of Anti-mage, thus its effect. If you found any grammar mistake or basicall any mistake please post it here. I'll try to fix it and make better cards.Lore:All Spellcaster-Type monster lose 500 ATK and DEF. Both player must pay 400 Life Points to activate a Spell/Trap Card. When your opponent activates monster card effect: Negate the effect, you can only use this effect of "Nullmagus Temple" once per turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flare909 Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 I like this effect; if I were you I would just replace decreasing Spellcaster attack to just saying you can active this spell once per duel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nyx Avatar Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 I'd say this card is fine. The only change it'd need is a bit of the wording "All Spellcaster-Type monsters lose 500 ATK and DEF." Otherwise, I'd say you did a good job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted June 11, 2015 Report Share Posted June 11, 2015 The one thing that I'm more/less concerned about is the negation effect; considering that we did go through a period in CC where Shi-En copying was NOT a good thing to copy. In this card's case, however, the negation is mandatory, so you don't have a choice about what you choose to block (but at the same time, it doesn't destroy like a lot of other negation cards do). The Spellcaster drop will make some impact on a few notable Decks, although the LP cost for YOU to activate a S/T card doesn't sound appealing. You could probably change it to affect both players; by extension, this would create some mindgames for the opponent; considering the fact many Decks are backrow-heavy nowadays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moatman Posted June 12, 2015 Author Report Share Posted June 12, 2015 Thank you for your reviews and constructive suggestion. I've changed the effect and wording a bit, and hopefully this one is better. Again, thank you for your responses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.