Jump to content

The importance of the Oxford comma.


Resident Fascist

Recommended Posts

The second one isn't even grammatically correct.

A comma would not be placed there if you were signifying the strippers were JFK and Stalin. Doing so would be inducing a list to describe the strippers and thus you'd use a semi-colon

Dude neither are correct cus there is no colon after strippers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude neither are correct cus there is no colon after strippers.

 

The only colon I see is after comma.

 

You must be blind.

 

But yes, the first is gramatically correct. When talking about 3 or more things you do Thing 1, Thing 2, and Thing 3.  You don't use a comma if you are talking about 2 things such as Thing A and Thing B.

 

The second is trying to place the strippers AS jfk and stalin. A comma does not work like that. You use a semi-colon to signify a following list to describe it.

 

Strippers; JFK and Stalin indicates that jfk and stalin are the strippers.

 

Strippers, jfk and stalin doesn't tell you anything because it needs to be a double comma, or a semi-colon instead of the first comma. English is a jabroni of a language for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...