The Nyx Avatar Posted November 9, 2015 Report Share Posted November 9, 2015 LORE:1 Zombie-Type Tuner monster + 1 or more non-Tuner monstersYou can only control 1 face-up "Macabre Dragon of the Ebon Flames".Zombie-Type monsters cannot be targeted by your opponent's card effects. Pyro-Type monsters cannot be destroyed by card effects. Once per turn, you can pay 800 Life Points; Special Summon 1 Zombie-Type or Pyro-Type monster from your hand or Graveyard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragulas Posted November 9, 2015 Report Share Posted November 9, 2015 The card is too powerfull, its stats are very high for a level 6 and its protected by its own effect being a zombie, but it doesnt specify your side only, so your opponent cant target his own zombies either (if he runs them). I like that although i dont know if it was intentional The 3rd effect i think should have a much higher cost or a draw back (and a hard OPT), the card requires a zombie to be made, so this is for zombie decks (of course), but you are giving them acces to all their monsters in graveyard for 800 lp. You can just summon plague +level 4, make this use the effect make a level 8 synchro (which i like a lot actually) Im curious why protecting pyro monsters?. I really like the concept of the card though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nyx Avatar Posted November 9, 2015 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2015 The card is too powerfull, its stats are very high for a level 6 and its protected by its own effect being a zombie, but it doesnt specify your side only, so your opponent cant target his own zombies either (if he runs them). I like that although i dont know if it was intentional The 3rd effect i think should have a much higher cost or a draw back (and a hard OPT), the card requires a zombie to be made, so this is for zombie decks (of course), but you are giving them acces to all their monsters in graveyard for 800 lp. You can just summon plague +level 4, make this use the effect make a level 8 synchro (which i like a lot actually) Im curious why protecting pyro monsters?. I really like the concept of the card thoughI can understand the third effect, being a minimal cost. However, its ATK and DEF are not unfair stats for a Level 6. Remember this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragulas Posted November 9, 2015 Report Share Posted November 9, 2015 I can understand the third effect, being a minimal cost. However, its ATK and DEF are not unfair stats for a Level 6. Remember this?i do and it used to be banned because of that (and because it was generic) I didnt say ther were unfair but the dragon has also a much better effect than goyo on top of the good stats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted November 11, 2015 Report Share Posted November 11, 2015 Hmm, when was the last time I saw Zombie and Pyro monsters in the same deck? It's a curious concept, but I would prefer it such that it is unable to protect itself. Even just attaching "other" to the Zombie protection effect can tone it down a fair bit. Still, a pretty superior LV6 for Zombies to reach towards, considering most of the alternatives. I would also apply a heavier cost to the SS effect - something that's a fair bit tougher to abuse seeing how lots of card interactions go everywhere, and discarding or milling doesn't look like a real cost anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.