Face McShooty Posted April 24, 2016 Report Share Posted April 24, 2016 this monster is dang near impossible to get out, BUT if you can get it out it's indestructible so I think they accessibility balances out the OP'd effect. If not, please help me make it more balanced. I put 5 Dinosaurs because according to the Jurassic Park wiki, there were 5 dinosaurs, and 2 reptiles (a frog and a viper) used to create this beast in Jurassic World, and I put the "except by a WATER Dinosaur-Type" because SPOILER: at the end of Jurassic World after the fight with Rexy, the Mosasaurus is the one who finishes the job on killing the Indominus Rex 5 Dinosaur-Type Monsters + 2 Reptile-Type MonstersThis monster cannot be destroyed by battle except by a WATER Dinosaur-Type monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 For a card that's a little more difficult to Summon than BEUD, it certainly is rather underwhelming. Yes, it can't be beat by battle with exception of a very specific Attribute-Type combination, but it also has a habit of dying instantly to any removal effect in the game. And when you've put a grand total of 8 cards into making this thing you'd certainly want something more than a beater that dies to removal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Face McShooty Posted April 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 What do you suggest then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 For all the effort you spend to make this card, I think you can safely get away with it being unaffected by Spells, Traps, and other monsters' effects, excluding that of WATER Dinosaur-Type monsters. It's a very extreme payout to match the very extreme barrier to entry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Face McShooty Posted April 25, 2016 Author Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 So "this monster cannot be targeted or destroyed by card effects or battle, except with a WATER Dinosaur-Type monster"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 That's about close enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryusei the Morning Star Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Uh no, flat out add the killer clause. This card is unaffected by all other effect. And for safe measure throw in a this card cannot be tributed clause too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellringer Angel Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Just add a "This card cannot leaves the field, except by battle". Even better than Tower Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebuchet MS Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 How far is too far for an 8-card investment? 9 (or 12 depending on how you count it) cards wins you the game outright (Horakty), in comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snatch Steal Posted April 25, 2016 Report Share Posted April 25, 2016 Lol @ CastelThis is an 8-card combo that isn't worth the effort. No one would even want to destroy it by battle anyway, given how vulnerable it is to just about every card effect ever. Besides, if you were playing against bad players (the only instance in which this card would be useable), they'd probably have Magic Cylinder, Draining Shield, Gorz (who isn't that bad, but not really useable), or Burning Mirror Force, not to mention Dark Hole & (maybe; they're bad) RaigekiTo say the least, using 8 cards to get this out is a total waste of time and energy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.