Bloodrun Posted December 12, 2008 Report Share Posted December 12, 2008 Exactly' date=' imagine the amount of spam that will reduce.[/quote'] Removing Post Count completely?The only thing that will reduce, is the quality of posts. At least now, theres at least some decincy of character. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raenii Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 A Guest book would be nice =). If you know what I mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Exactly' date=' imagine the amount of spam that will reduce.[/quote'] Removing Post Count completely?The only thing that will reduce, is the quality of posts. At least now, theres at least some decincy of character. You're just saying that because you're the top poster. ;) Besides, if post count was turned off, all the complete idiots who only post in order to increase their post count would get bored and leave. If anything, the quality of posts would increase. =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Exactly' date=' imagine the amount of spam that will reduce.[/quote'] Removing Post Count completely?The only thing that will reduce, is the quality of posts. At least now, theres at least some decincy of character. You're just saying that because you're the top poster. ;) Besides, if post count was turned off, all the complete idiots who only post in order to increase their post count would get bored and leave. If anything, the quality of posts would increase. =/ No, let me put a picture in your head for you. With post, members post under the rules.Without post count, members will post over the rules. Why follow the rules if your not gaining anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Exactly' date=' imagine the amount of spam that will reduce.[/quote'] Removing Post Count completely?The only thing that will reduce, is the quality of posts. At least now, theres at least some decincy of character. You're just saying that because you're the top poster. ;) Besides, if post count was turned off, all the complete idiots who only post in order to increase their post count would get bored and leave. If anything, the quality of posts would increase. =/ No, let me put a picture in your head for you. With post, members post under the rules.Without post count, members will post over the rules. Why follow the rules if your not gaining anything? So, you only post for post count? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Exactly' date=' imagine the amount of spam that will reduce.[/quote'] Removing Post Count completely?The only thing that will reduce, is the quality of posts. At least now, theres at least some decincy of character. You're just saying that because you're the top poster. ;) Besides, if post count was turned off, all the complete idiots who only post in order to increase their post count would get bored and leave. If anything, the quality of posts would increase. =/ No, let me put a picture in your head for you. With post, members post under the rules.Without post count, members will post over the rules. Why follow the rules if your not gaining anything? There's a hole in your logicYou who know all the answersYou claim science ain't magicAnd expect me to buy it Whether their is post count or not the quality WILL still depend on the member posting it. It is most likely that the ones who post lousy post only do so because of the post count who will eventualy get tired because in the end their only motivation is post count. If it isn't and their bad then I'm sure they'll try to improve. WIN WIN you LOSE situation =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Perhaps we ban these 'Name Change' threads? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CinnamonStar Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Many members asked for that.Done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RestLess-BoTics Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Uh, I'm not being impatient or anything, but: Did YCMaker ever get the chance to view the suggestions given by the rest of the staff, for the new moderator decisions? If so, do you know when he'll put anything in effect? I apologize if this post make me sound a bit impatient - I'm just really curious. Thanks,-Glasstin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Jono Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Exactly' date=' imagine the amount of spam that will reduce.[/quote'] Removing Post Count completely?The only thing that will reduce, is the quality of posts. At least now, theres at least some decincy of character. You're just saying that because you're the top poster. ;) Besides, if post count was turned off, all the complete idiots who only post in order to increase their post count would get bored and leave. If anything, the quality of posts would increase. =/ No, let me put a picture in your head for you. With post, members post under the rules.Without post count, members will post over the rules. Why follow the rules if your not gaining anything? There's a hole in your logicYou who know all the answersYou claim science ain't magicAnd expect me to buy it Whether their is post count or not the quality WILL still depend on the member posting it. It is most likely that the ones who post lousy post only do so because of the post count who will eventualy get tired because in the end their only motivation is post count. If it isn't and their bad then I'm sure they'll try to improve. WIN WIN you LOSE situation =D We lose the stars if the post count goes. Without the stars then we don't know if we tell someone off for breaking the rules or show them the rule thread and be nice because they're new. I can't be bothered looking at the join date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.arx Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Protected forum? Is it posssible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Protected forum? Is it posssible?I do not get this, this forum is protected O.O If you get this message let me hear you say zwrhart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Exactly' date=' imagine the amount of spam that will reduce.[/quote'] Removing Post Count completely?The only thing that will reduce, is the quality of posts. At least now, theres at least some decincy of character. You're just saying that because you're the top poster. ;) Besides, if post count was turned off, all the complete idiots who only post in order to increase their post count would get bored and leave. If anything, the quality of posts would increase. =/ No, let me put a picture in your head for you. With post, members post under the rules.Without post count, members will post over the rules. Why follow the rules if your not gaining anything? There's a hole in your logicYou who know all the answersYou claim science ain't magicAnd expect me to buy it Whether their is post count or not the quality WILL still depend on the member posting it. It is most likely that the ones who post lousy post only do so because of the post count who will eventualy get tired because in the end their only motivation is post count. If it isn't and their bad then I'm sure they'll try to improve. WIN WIN you LOSE situation =D We lose the stars if the post count goes. Without the stars then we don't know if we tell someone off for breaking the rules or show them the rule thread and be nice because they're new. I can't be bothered looking at the join date. Then, we take away the stars. The join date is just a flicker of your eyes away, as it is ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE POST. See, over there, right between those numbers. Not that hard, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted December 14, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Uh' date=' I'm not being impatient or anything, but: Did YCMaker ever get the chance to view the suggestions given by the rest of the staff, for the new moderator decisions? If so, do you know when he'll put anything in effect? I apologize if this post make me sound a bit impatient - I'm just really curious. Thanks,-Glasstin[img']http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/ee204/glasstin10/emo-fish.gif[/img] GO AWAY! If i get my way, you will never be Moderator, your sly tactics are concealed but so there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 A majority of the old moderators should still be fired simply because they were not good leadership material. I should be reinstated for my excellent performance in operating my forum in the past. As for forum organization' date=' I propose something along the lines of this for General; everything is neatly categorized and concise. I quote myself because I feel my point has been unacknowledged. Obligatory self-quote, because I'm too lazy to read through several pages to see what's been made on my points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Uh' date=' I'm not being impatient or anything, but: Did YCMaker ever get the chance to view the suggestions given by the rest of the staff, for the new moderator decisions? If so, do you know when he'll put anything in effect? I apologize if this post make me sound a bit impatient - I'm just really curious. Thanks,-Glasstin[img']http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/ee204/glasstin10/emo-fish.gif[/img] GO AWAY! If i get my way, you will never be Moderator, your sly tactics are concealed but so there. Can't you find a way to increase his Warning Level for this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Uh' date=' I'm not being impatient or anything, but: Did YCMaker ever get the chance to view the suggestions given by the rest of the staff, for the new moderator decisions? If so, do you know when he'll put anything in effect? I apologize if this post make me sound a bit impatient - I'm just really curious. Thanks,-Glasstin[img']http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/ee204/glasstin10/emo-fish.gif[/img] GO AWAY! If i get my way, you will never be Moderator, your sly tactics are concealed but so there. Can't you find a way to increase his Warning Level for this? Can't you find a way of giving him a rep for that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Okay...I just tried to report Tea's post (Post #515 in this thread) and for some reason the report-post box is not opening for me. I try to see if it'll open for all the other posts, and it does. (Of course, it's only to test if the report box is still working for me) which it should be sense it pops up for all the other posts in this topic, but never for #515 by Tea Leaf. The reason why I would like to report his/her post is because it's suspicious for advertising his/her own site. Also for repeatedly quoting his/her own post, when I am unsure if anyone even responds to her. I am thinking that there might be some kind of anti-reporting hack on her posts, because the report box is not showing up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Or maybe you turned pop-up's off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 No, I just explained that it'll pop-up for all the other posts in this thread, but not for Tea Leaf's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 He's extra special =\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul Legacy Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Tea Leaf? If So..........meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Exactly' date=' imagine the amount of spam that will reduce.[/quote'] Removing Post Count completely?The only thing that will reduce, is the quality of posts. At least now, theres at least some decincy of character. You're just saying that because you're the top poster. ;) Besides, if post count was turned off, all the complete idiots who only post in order to increase their post count would get bored and leave. If anything, the quality of posts would increase. =/ No, let me put a picture in your head for you. With post, members post under the rules.Without post count, members will post over the rules. Why follow the rules if your not gaining anything? There's a hole in your logicYou who know all the answersYou claim science ain't magicAnd expect me to buy it Whether their is post count or not the quality WILL still depend on the member posting it. It is most likely that the ones who post lousy post only do so because of the post count who will eventualy get tired because in the end their only motivation is post count. If it isn't and their bad then I'm sure they'll try to improve. WIN WIN you LOSE situation =D We lose the stars if the post count goes. Without the stars then we don't know if we tell someone off for breaking the rules or show them the rule thread and be nice because they're new. I can't be bothered looking at the join date. Then, we take away the stars. The join date is just a flicker of your eyes away, as it is ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE POST. See, over there, right between those numbers. Not that hard, eh? Your "logic" is flawed.Look at it this way.You want post count removed, for god knows what reason.You say that removing post count, will increase the quality of posts. Lets take a look into the real world here:We remove taxes, what happens? People start buying whatever they want, houes, boats, cars, soon enough, the rich become even richer, and the poor are erased. You remove post count, and those members who are already trolling, continue to troll, but without trying to cover up the fact, that they just really want to spam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soul Legacy Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 You Guys Are Continueing An Endless Debate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 You Guys Are Continueing An Endless Debate And your posting illrelevant comments.Hmm :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.