Sander Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 [spoiler=Effect]You can Special Summon this card from your hand when a EARTH monster is removed from play. When this card destroys a monster by battle, you can Special Summon 1 Rock-Type monster from your Graveyard and destroy 2 cards on the field. [spoiler=Art Credit]Credit [spoiler=Other]Holo sheet credit goes to hobbes96 If you are going to say that something is wrong with my card's OCG, then point it out. If you do end up saying OCG is wrong and NOT pointing it out, I will neg rep you. Yeah, this holo looks bad, damn CS3 crack funking up <.< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 The card redefines overpowered. The only OCG error is that it should say "...when an EARTH monster...". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 Nothing really wrong with OCG. It looks overpowered seeing as after you destroy a monster, you can Summon a monster from your graveyard + destroy 2 cards. I'd put in a pretty good cost for something like this. Maybe make it lvl 4 too. Idea looks alright though. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted December 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 If I'm not mistaken, Rock and Earth support with a medium effect like this is already considered as overpowered? *sigh* No freaking offense, but I'm pretty sure none of you (yes, even Demented) knows what overpowered means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 If I'm not mistaken' date=' Rock and Earth support with a medium effect like this is already considered as overpowered? *sigh* No freaking offense, but I'm pretty sure none of you (yes, even Demented) knows what overpowered means.[/quote'] [sarcasm]Yeah, a +3 isn't overpowered.[/sarcasm] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted December 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 If I'm not mistaken' date=' Rock and Earth support with a medium effect like this is already considered as overpowered? *sigh* No freaking offense, but I'm pretty sure none of you (yes, even Demented) knows what overpowered means.[/quote'] [sarcasm]Yeah, a +3 isn't overpowered.[/sarcasm] You fail to see that you'd need to be running a basically dead Type to to get that second effect <.< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 Make it so that the Special Summoned monster cannot declare an attack or activate it's effect for the remainder of the turn and that only 1 monster is destroyed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 destroy 1 card is good enough for me, but destroy 1 face-up monster is even better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 I <3 the name 'Deathbolder'And as an interesting idea, you could combo this card iith Megarock Dragon to do some pretty good damage o_o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 Decent. Balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 If I'm not mistaken' date=' Rock and Earth support with a medium effect like this is already considered as overpowered? *sigh* No freaking offense, but I'm pretty sure none of you (yes, even Demented) knows what overpowered means.[/quote'] [sarcasm]Yeah, a +3 isn't overpowered.[/sarcasm] You fail to see that you'd need to be running a basically dead Type to to get that second effect <.< and YOU fail to se how a type can come back from the ashes, honestly, did you ever think we'd see funtional Fairy decks again, and the Counter Faires show up, honestly, rock could easily make a comeback Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legendhiro Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 you guys all have valid points. why don't you guys agree to disagree before this turns into an argument that is really out of hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silas Angel Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 your ocg sucks! jk jk.. O.o please no neg me? Anywhos, good card. I give it a 9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legendhiro Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 i like it too. because of the look of it i would use it as an ace in my monk fighter/master monk deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted December 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 If I'm not mistaken' date=' Rock and Earth support with a medium effect like this is already considered as overpowered? *sigh* No freaking offense, but I'm pretty sure none of you (yes, even Demented) knows what overpowered means.[/quote'] [sarcasm]Yeah, a +3 isn't overpowered.[/sarcasm] You fail to see that you'd need to be running a basically dead Type to to get that second effect <.< and YOU fail to se how a type can come back from the ashes, honestly, did you ever think we'd see funtional Fairy decks again, and the Counter Faires show up, honestly, rock could easily make a comeback And that's bad, how? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 a = an. Limited Edition cannot be in circ without gold sticker. Just because an OP'd card's a Rock-Type doesn't mean it ain't OP'd. Yata-Garasu was a Winged-Beast WIND monster, that didn't stop anyone from using it. This can Special Summon itself easily (Gigantes would be fun), and when you destroy a monster by battle it's a +3. Dude. A +3. Pot of Greed was a +1. Remember this kids. I'd make this LV6, take out the "destroy 2 cards" thing, and raise the DEF to about 2400. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted December 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 So, immediately, some support for a near-dead type is automatically op'd which isn't even that op'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted December 25, 2008 Report Share Posted December 25, 2008 So' date=' immediately, some support for a near-dead type is automatically op'd which isn't even that op'd.[/quote'] What exactly is the "which" referring to? The overpoweredness of the card? The existence of the card? The immediate reaction? The type? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avariademon Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 it is overpowered, overpowered is overpowered nomatter what "near-dead type" you make it for its still overpowered. as said, its a +3 you know what else is an instant plus three? dark armed dragon you can easily defend D.A.D.'s overpoweredness by saying that the requirement of three darks in the grave makes it ballenced. ok, so this is a 1450 monster, the requirement is that it needs to destroy something by battle to activate the broken effect. thats fair right? this monster is so weak. i mean being less then 1500 means its searchable by rat, also shrink is an easy way to make that a really good effect. though on the other hand i can see how its not THAT broken, mainly because its effect only activates when attacking, which is easily stopped. my finnal say is that its broken yes, but its probably only sleightly, mainly because the conditions in which the broken effect is activated are easily adverted, its not like D.A.D.'s insta pop ability, i feel like the approach might be a bit off, because as it is in order to make this a stratagy reviver you would have to add something, but then it would be overly broken, i duknow 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.