Another Old Friend

[Mutant Monster RAEG-HAPYP]

It's funny how this was limited while Caius is still at 3

It's also funny how Raiza was the only monarch limited

 

discuss

[Mr. Judgment Dragon]

Raiza deserves to be at 3. Konami sucks at ban lists.

[Jesus]

Raiza deserves to be at 3. Konami sucks at ban lists.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Raiza deserves to be at 3. Konami sucks at ban lists.

[Jericho]

Ooh. A tribute effect for a bounce is so scarry in a world where Stardust Dragon and Solem Judgement reign supreme.

Raiza deserves to be at 3. Konami sucks at ban lists.

[MarbleZone]

Ooh. A tribute effect for a bounce is so scarry in a world where Stardust Dragon and Solem Judgement reign supreme.

 

Incidentally' date=' Stardust's effect doesn't block Raiza's.

 

Also, now that it was mentioned... in a different meta, where decent cards [i']are[/i] good enough, instead of this format where games end in 3 turns, should this card be unlimited?

 

I understand there are much bigger threats at the moment, and Tribute Summoning became partially obsolete, but in a meta without super-fast TeleDAD decks, for example, would it be acceptable to have Raiza and Caius at 3?

[armageddon08]

Ooh. A tribute effect for a bounce is so scarry in a world where Stardust Dragon and Solem Judgement reign supreme.

 

Incidentally' date=' Stardust's effect doesn't block Raiza's.

 

Also, now that it was mentioned... in a different meta, where decent cards [i']are[/i] good enough, instead of this format where games end in 3 turns, should this card be unlimited?

 

I understand there are much bigger threats at the moment, and Tribute Summoning became partially obsolete, but in a meta without super-fast TeleDAD decks, for example, would it be acceptable to have Raiza and Caius at 3?

Are you saying Konami is smart enough to make a TeleDADless deck reign supreme?

[Jericho]

Ooh. A tribute effect for a bounce is so scarry in a world where Stardust Dragon and Solem Judgement reign supreme.

 

Incidentally' date=' Stardust's effect doesn't block Raiza's.

 

Also, now that it was mentioned... in a different meta, where decent cards [i']are[/i] good enough, instead of this format where games end in 3 turns, should this card be unlimited?

 

I understand there are much bigger threats at the moment, and Tribute Summoning became partially obsolete, but in a meta without super-fast TeleDAD decks, for example, would it be acceptable to have Raiza and Caius at 3?

 

In a meta without, it would not. But there is a certain need for the ban list to be altered with each new meta. In a time where TeleDAD reights supreme, there is no reason for Raiza to be Limited when it could be Semi-Limited. If you could even summon it, it would be a small defense against DAD.

[Megaworm]

Ooh. A tribute effect for a bounce is so scarry in a world where Stardust Dragon and Solem Judgement reign supreme.

 

Incidentally' date=' Stardust's effect doesn't block Raiza's.

 

Also, now that it was mentioned... in a different meta, where decent cards [i']are[/i] good enough, instead of this format where games end in 3 turns, should this card be unlimited?

 

I understand there are much bigger threats at the moment, and Tribute Summoning became partially obsolete, but in a meta without super-fast TeleDAD decks, for example, would it be acceptable to have Raiza and Caius at 3?

 

In a meta without, it would not. But there is a certain need for the ban list to be altered with each new meta. In a time where TeleDAD reights supreme, there is no reason for Raiza to be Limited when it could be Semi-Limited. If you could even summon it, it would be a small defense against DAD.

as long as they don't unban anything that will make Tele-DAD worse. People are saying "Unban Raigeki and Harpies Feather Dust so we can battle against Tele-DAD dur hur hur" when they forget Tele-DAD can run those cards, and destroying Dark Armed Dragon is nothing big because there is still one left. Smashing Ground works alot better.

[Jericho]

Ooh. A tribute effect for a bounce is so scarry in a world where Stardust Dragon and Solem Judgement reign supreme.

 

Incidentally' date=' Stardust's effect doesn't block Raiza's.

 

Also, now that it was mentioned... in a different meta, where decent cards [i']are[/i] good enough, instead of this format where games end in 3 turns, should this card be unlimited?

 

I understand there are much bigger threats at the moment, and Tribute Summoning became partially obsolete, but in a meta without super-fast TeleDAD decks, for example, would it be acceptable to have Raiza and Caius at 3?

 

In a meta without, it would not. But there is a certain need for the ban list to be altered with each new meta. In a time where TeleDAD reights supreme, there is no reason for Raiza to be Limited when it could be Semi-Limited. If you could even summon it, it would be a small defense against DAD.

as long as they don't unban anything that will make Tele-DAD worse. People are saying "Unban Raigeki and Harpies Feather Dust so we can battle against Tele-DAD dur hur hur" when they forget Tele-DAD can run those cards, and destroying Dark Armed Dragon is nothing big because there is still one left. Smashing Ground works alot better.

 

Umm. Doesn't DaD need exactly 3 DARK monsters in the grave? And DaD in the grave would make 4? So destroying DaD is something. Plus, there's always Lightning Vortex to replace Regeki.

[Father Wolf]

should still be at 3, even though i hated when monarch decks reigned supreme but Raiza was never the problem.

[Flame Dragon]

Ooh. A tribute effect for a bounce is so scarry in a world where Stardust Dragon and Solem Judgement reign supreme.

 

Incidentally' date=' Stardust's effect doesn't block Raiza's.

 

Also, now that it was mentioned... in a different meta, where decent cards [i']are[/i] good enough, instead of this format where games end in 3 turns, should this card be unlimited?

 

I understand there are much bigger threats at the moment, and Tribute Summoning became partially obsolete, but in a meta without super-fast TeleDAD decks, for example, would it be acceptable to have Raiza and Caius at 3?

 

In a meta without, it would not. But there is a certain need for the ban list to be altered with each new meta. In a time where TeleDAD reights supreme, there is no reason for Raiza to be Limited when it could be Semi-Limited. If you could even summon it, it would be a small defense against DAD.

as long as they don't unban anything that will make Tele-DAD worse. People are saying "Unban Raigeki and Harpies Feather Dust so we can battle against Tele-DAD dur hur hur" when they forget Tele-DAD can run those cards, and destroying Dark Armed Dragon is nothing big because there is still one left. Smashing Ground works alot better.

 

Umm. Doesn't DaD need exactly 3 DARK monsters in the grave? And DaD in the grave would make 4? So destroying DaD is something. Plus, there's always Lightning Vortex to replace Regeki.

If you got DAD out, odds are their would be no Dark monster in your grave when he is destroyed.

[Megaworm]

Ooh. A tribute effect for a bounce is so scarry in a world where Stardust Dragon and Solem Judgement reign supreme.

 

Incidentally' date=' Stardust's effect doesn't block Raiza's.

 

Also, now that it was mentioned... in a different meta, where decent cards [i']are[/i] good enough, instead of this format where games end in 3 turns, should this card be unlimited?

 

I understand there are much bigger threats at the moment, and Tribute Summoning became partially obsolete, but in a meta without super-fast TeleDAD decks, for example, would it be acceptable to have Raiza and Caius at 3?

 

In a meta without, it would not. But there is a certain need for the ban list to be altered with each new meta. In a time where TeleDAD reights supreme, there is no reason for Raiza to be Limited when it could be Semi-Limited. If you could even summon it, it would be a small defense against DAD.

as long as they don't unban anything that will make Tele-DAD worse. People are saying "Unban Raigeki and Harpies Feather Dust so we can battle against Tele-DAD dur hur hur" when they forget Tele-DAD can run those cards, and destroying Dark Armed Dragon is nothing big because there is still one left. Smashing Ground works alot better.

 

Umm. Doesn't DaD need exactly 3 DARK monsters in the grave? And DaD in the grave would make 4? So destroying DaD is something. Plus, there's always Lightning Vortex to replace Regeki.

If you got DAD out, odds are their would be no Dark monster in your grave when he is destroyed.

that's not the point. Raigeki would make Tele-DAD decks more of a pain in the ass to beat due to a costless monster nuke, meaning DaD wouldn't need to remove any monsters from the graveyard to kill anything, and he would unleash hell on your life points. Still, if he gets destroyed then there would be 4, yes yes, no more DaD, but they get summoned simultaneously anyway so, that's another problem. Lightning Vortex is win, but you might end up having a hand you must not discard anything from.

[Azuh]

Ooh. A tribute effect for a bounce is so scarry in a world where Stardust Dragon and Solem Judgement reign supreme.

Raiza deserves to be at 3. Konami sucks at ban lists.

 

When Monarchs were reigning supreme, i really hated them because everyone used them. Now, since DaD is around, i want these back. BRING BACK MONARCHS

[CrabHelmet]

One nice thing about Monarchs was that, even when they had somewhere in the range of 12 of the Top 16 deck sat SJC's, there were so many different decktypes that even the two different strongest Monarch decktypes together (usually Macro and Twilight Circle) could generally only fill maybe 8 of the Top 16.

 

Ont he other hand, when Tele-DAD takes 13 of the Top 16, you'll be lucky if even one of those 13 is the DDT-Tele-DAD variant.

[Azmodius]

Konami is retarded, the'l never come out with a good ban list.

[Megaworm]

i just noticed something.....why is Raiza a winged beast without wings, not even any bird-thingies on it? It would've been better as a warrior or something like that.

[Azuh]

i just noticed something.....why is Raiza a winged beast without wings' date=' not even any bird-thingies on it? It would've been better as a warrior or something like that.

[/quote']

 

Hes that awesome. he doesn't need wings to be a Winged-Beast

[Megaworm]

i just noticed something.....why is Raiza a winged beast without wings' date=' not even any bird-thingies on it? It would've been better as a warrior or something like that.

[/quote']

 

Hes that awesome. he doesn't need wings to be a Winged-Beast

 

Just like Dark Witch is awesome enough to be a Light Fairy.

[Azuh]

i just noticed something.....why is Raiza a winged beast without wings' date=' not even any bird-thingies on it? It would've been better as a warrior or something like that.

[/quote']

 

Hes that awesome. he doesn't need wings to be a Winged-Beast

 

Just like Dark Witch is awesome enough to be a Light Fairy.

 

Too right, my jolly old chap

 

Here, have a cookie

[Megaworm]

i just noticed something.....why is Raiza a winged beast without wings' date=' not even any bird-thingies on it? It would've been better as a warrior or something like that.

[/quote']

 

Hes that awesome. he doesn't need wings to be a Winged-Beast

 

Just like Dark Witch is awesome enough to be a Light Fairy.

 

Too right, my jolly old chap

 

Here, have a cookie

 

cool. What's the best Monarch to choose from?

[armageddon08]

I'dd have to say Caius for obvious reasons.

[armageddon08]

I'dd have to say Caius for obvious reasons.

[Megaworm]

i knoo it. Is caius splashable?

[Mr. Judgment Dragon]

i knoo it. Is caius splashable?

 

I guess.