I Hate Snatch Steal Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 Note: the intent was to make a bubbleman parody, so that's why the card art is a recolor. Unlike monst of the time where I recolor out of necessity (I can't draw) I wanted to this time. Your thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Command Knight Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 Captilize "summoned" and I think you should capitalize the d and p "defense position" and put a space between "end" and "phase" and capitalize the beginning e and p. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 All of the above is correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 Overpowered. That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Hate Snatch Steal Posted December 26, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 Granted, it is powerful but how often will you have a totally empty field? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 Granted' date=' it is powerful but how often will you have a totally empty field?[/quote'] You act as though having an empty field is some ridiculously improbable scenario. You know, as if the field didn't start out being totally empty, and your opponent isn't doing everything he can to wipe your field clean. Does the name "Gorz" mean anything to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legendhiro Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 i'm with crab. make it only one card drawn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Hate Snatch Steal Posted December 26, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 Granted' date=' it is powerful but how often will you have a totally empty field?[/quote'] You act as though having an empty field is some ridiculously improbable scenario. You know, as if the field didn't start out being totally empty, and your opponent isn't doing everything he can to wipe your field clean. Does the name "Gorz" mean anything to you? Ah, yes, gorz and the blitzkrieg format we are in right now, I forgot... but still, its not game breaking unless you draw something big with it's effect. I will consider changing it however. edit: this card's most important component is the ability to draw 2 cards, everything else, (the stats, the change to defense effect) is icing on the cake. How would you recommend I switch it assuming I kept the draw effect the same. How can he still serve his purpose without being broken or underpowered? (Drawing 1 card only makes him underpowered as he is not meant to be a gadget.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 Granted' date=' it is powerful but how often will you have a totally empty field?[/quote'] You act as though having an empty field is some ridiculously improbable scenario. You know, as if the field didn't start out being totally empty, and your opponent isn't doing everything he can to wipe your field clean. Does the name "Gorz" mean anything to you? Ah, yes, gorz and the blitzkrieg format we are in right now, I forgot... but still, its not game breaking unless you draw something big with it's effect. I will consider changing it however. Gorz is a problem in any format. Keeping your opponent's field clear would be something vaguely similar to a challenge. But clearing your own? That's a joke. Also, easy draw like this is always a problem. Pot of Greed isn't "not game breaking unless you draw something big with its effect". edit: this card's most important component is the ability to draw 2 cards' date=' everything else, (the stats, the change to defense effect) is icing on the cake. How would you recommend I switch it assuming I kept the draw effect the same. How can he still serve his purpose without being broken or underpowered? [/quote'] His purpose is fundamentally flawed. 2-card draw should not be this easy. (Drawing 1 card only makes him underpowered as he is not meant to be a gadget.) Not all floaters are Gadgets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Hate Snatch Steal Posted December 26, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 Granted' date=' it is powerful but how often will you have a totally empty field?[/quote'] You act as though having an empty field is some ridiculously improbable scenario. You know, as if the field didn't start out being totally empty, and your opponent isn't doing everything he can to wipe your field clean. Does the name "Gorz" mean anything to you? Ah, yes, gorz and the blitzkrieg format we are in right now, I forgot... but still, its not game breaking unless you draw something big with it's effect. I will consider changing it however. Gorz is a problem in any format. Keeping your opponent's field clear would be something vaguely similar to a challenge. But clearing your own? That's a joke. Also, easy draw like this is always a problem. Pot of Greed isn't "not game breaking unless you draw something big with its effect". edit: this card's most important component is the ability to draw 2 cards' date=' everything else, (the stats, the change to defense effect) is icing on the cake. How would you recommend I switch it assuming I kept the draw effect the same. How can he still serve his purpose without being broken or underpowered? [/quote'] His purpose is fundamentally flawed. 2-card draw should not be this easy. (Drawing 1 card only makes him underpowered as he is not meant to be a gadget.) Not all floaters are Gadgets. Lets just agree to disagree then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fog38 Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 I don't think its fair to call this card over powered. It has the same effect as normal Bubbleman, minus the last part, and the original wasn't over powered. In fact, the original was hardly playable in my experience. Other then that, this card isn't to original my friend, sorry. 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 I don't think its fair to call this card over powered. It has the same effect as normal Bubbleman' date=' minus the last part, and the original wasn't over powered. In fact, the original was hardly playable in my experience. Other then that, this card isn't to original my friend, sorry. 6/10[/quote'] Next time, try actually reading the regular Bubbleman. His real effect isn't the same as his Anime effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted December 26, 2008 Report Share Posted December 26, 2008 I don't think its fair to call this card over powered. It has the same effect as normal Bubbleman' date=' minus the last part, and the original wasn't over powered. In fact, the original was hardly playable in my experience. Other then that, this card isn't to original my friend, sorry. 6/10[/quote'] if you think about it... the normal bubbleman lets you draw 2 cards if its the only card in your field AND HAND...thats a diference... + this one has higher standards... the pic is only an inverted bubbleman or something like that -_-" please..put more effort in the pic next time.... 6/10 I don't consider it overpowered but I don't concider it balanced either... I don't know how to explain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.