CrabHelmet Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Place this card on the list. And provide reasoning, you numbskulls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 3. ITM: LolBatlingmonstersbeforefieldnukingcardsotk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 searchable by RotA, if you attack or its attacked, you just remove this and the monster from play (JD and DAD dont like that), Id say it should stay limited, just because it gets rid of what your opponent has, almost no matter what. and you get to decide. what else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Simi-Limited shes only RotAibl and Honestibl but thats lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 I can't think of any benefit this offers at one that would keep it from being banned, and any banworthy effect that would keep it from being at three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 searchable by RotA' date=' if you attack or its attacked, you just remove this and the monster from play (JD and DAD dont like that), Id say it should stay limited, just because it gets rid of what your opponent has, almost no matter what. and you get to decide. what else?[/quote'] Exiled Force Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fat Guy Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 I can't see why this is at 1 while D.D. Warrior and D.D. Assailant are at 3. The only difference is the option to remove. There is nothing that option can do that Assailant or Warrior can't do. And I don't think I've ever seen anyone choose not to do the effect. I say, like her best friends, she should be at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 This card offers a decision:to remove or not to remove. It has low attack power for this format, but it is easily searchable and can lead to field control if used right. I say this should stay at 1 because it would be dangerous when placed at 2, and just ridiculous when plaed at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 inb4ShiningAngel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 searchable by RotA' date=' if you attack or its attacked, you just remove this and the monster from play (JD and DAD dont like that), Id say it should stay limited, just because it gets rid of what your opponent has, almost no matter what. and you get to decide. what else?[/quote'] Exiled Force sends it to the Graveyard, has less ATK, and DD lady removes it from play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 searchable by RotA' date=' if you attack or its attacked, you just remove this and the monster from play (JD and DAD dont like that), Id say it should stay limited, just because it gets rid of what your opponent has, almost no matter what. and you get to decide. what else?[/quote'] Exiled Force sends it to the Graveyard, has less ATK, and DD lady removes it from play. Exiled is still faster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 In this topic, any card that isn't exactly like another card except worse should be Limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 searchable by RotA' date=' if you attack or its attacked, you just remove this and the monster from play (JD and DAD dont like that), Id say it should stay limited, just because it gets rid of what your opponent has, almost no matter what. and you get to decide. what else?[/quote'] Exiled Force sends it to the Graveyard, has less ATK, and DD lady removes it from play.Plus DDWL's effect can be activated on your opponent's turn and can make your opponent use up cards a lot faster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 There is nothing that option can do that Assailant or Warrior can't do. Sure there is. Smashing into a Spirit Reaper or a Marshmallon or a defense position monster with Assailant won't do anything. Smashing into the above with Warrior will automatically RFG them, leaving you with no defense. Warrior Lady is a combo of both, a better version of both. If you think your opponent might need his monster, you choose to RFG. If you can run over the monster anyway, you run it over and keep field prescence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 ROTA-ble and LIGHT, but it's effect is only good when destroyed by battle. Given the current meta, I'd leave this at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 ROTA, Honest, and an out to every Synchro.Good card. :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Deserves to be at 3. Konami sucks at ban lists. Proof. They throw random limits at cards that are apart of a broken card instead of just banning the said broken card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Fat Guy Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 There is nothing that option can do that Assailant or Warrior can't do. Sure there is. Smashing into a Spirit Reaper or a Marshmallon or a defense position monster with Assailant won't do anything. Smashing into the above with Warrior will automatically RFG them' date=' leaving you with no defense. Warrior Lady is a combo of both, a better version of both. If you think your opponent might need his monster, you choose to RFG. If you can run over the monster anyway, you run it over and keep field prescence.[/quote'] That's true. I still don't think it's any reason to keep her at 1, though. She's definitely better than her counterparts, but I don't think she'd be detrimental to the game at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 OMG, 1-for-1 removal with legs! BANN ITZZZ! Oh, well, I want it at 3, for the same reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamer95317 Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Place this card on the list. And provide reasoning' date=' you numbskulls.[/quote'] if you have the life to spare and the enemy has a strong card on the field, you could sacrifice this card to remove it from gameplay nice card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Place this card on the list. And provide reasoning' date=' you numbskulls.[/quote'] if you have the life to spare and the enemy has a strong card on the field, you could sacrifice this card to remove it from gameplay nice card This, however, learn2phrase and DDWL @ 3 poses no problems I mean realy, by the time you summon it, you're likely to be squirming around on the ground so traumatised that all you can say is "DAD" or "Judgment" however, if you get it in your first hand, and dont loose it, it might be ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Me Emo Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Should be at 3... like someone else said 1-for-1 removal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 should be at 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megaworm Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 searchable by RotA' date=' if you attack or its attacked, you just remove this and the monster from play (JD and DAD dont like that), Id say it should stay limited, just because it gets rid of what your opponent has, almost no matter what. and you get to decide. what else?[/quote'] Exiled Force sends it to the Graveyard, has less ATK, and DD lady removes it from play. Exiled is still faster:|nope. D.D. Warrior Ledey is fasterz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logmon1 Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 searchable by RotA' date=' if you attack or its attacked, you just remove this and the monster from play (JD and DAD dont like that), Id say it should stay limited, just because it gets rid of what your opponent has, almost no matter what. and you get to decide. what else?[/quote'] Exiled Force sends it to the Graveyard, has less ATK, and DD lady removes it from play. Exiled is still faster:|nope. D.D. Warrior Ledey is fasterz Learn2play Exiled is obviously faster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.