YuugiCM Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 OMG tsh yes man what if somebody comes to you and then they try to kill you or you favorite ones YOU NEED A GUN TO USE IT!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 NO LET'S SEE WHAT HAPPENS: GUY TAKES OUT GUN : DON'T MOVE OR I SHOOT.YOU TAKE OUT GUN A POINT AT HIM: DON'T MOVETHE GUY SHOOTS YOU, AND YOU SHOOT HIM. BOTH DEAD!!!!!!!! ALSO, GUNS LAWS ARE DIFFERENT IN VANCOUVER AND WE HAD 12 SHOOTINGS IN FEBRUARY ALONE. Thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Supreme Gamesmaster Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 NO LET'S SEE WHAT HAPPENS: GUY TAKES OUT GUN : DON'T MOVE OR I SHOOT.YOU TAKE OUT GUN A POINT AT HIM: DON'T MOVETHE GUY SHOOTS YOU' date=' AND YOU SHOOT HIM. BOTH DEAD!!!!!!!![/quote']The odds of your reflexes being identical are next to none; one or the other would have killed the other before they could pull their trigger. Your second statement defeats your own argument. The necessity to use all-caps indicates overcompensation in a flawed argument. Inspector Crampton' date=' of the Toronto police, has released a much-publicized report that claims a person would not have to walk more than two kilometers "to pick up a hot piece."[/quote']Canadian firearm restrictions are much stronger than American ones, but they obviously don't work. What people need to look at is why guns are so dangerous. Instead of outlawing guns' date=' make bullets, shells, etc. cost like $5000 each. Then, nobody would even think about shooting someone because they couldn't afford it. When combined with the current recession in the American economy, people would think twice before shooting someone.[/quote'] Everyone who says anything like this is instantly made of fail. It's a little something called the black market. Oh, don't be so naive... The only people who really access the black market are drug lords... and mafia/gang members... and criminals in general... heh....So... the only people who really access the black market are also the only people who would bother with shootings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 @Gamemaster:I'm pretty sure Willeh was being sarcastic. If not, then I'll facepalm to his post. @Luna:CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL, AMIRITE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHawk Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Butting in: I think should have the right to carry guns. Its for safety all people. Think if it as a last resorte. Or carry one around thats not loaded. You could pull it out when you are in danger and people might think its loaded and back away' date=' run or something. A law should pass for this and thats final. Well its not final but it should be.[/quote'] But wouldn't that just alert people to the fact that your gun isn't loaded so that they can carry a knife around which works regardless of whether or not it has bullets in it? Yeah but how would they know if its loaded or not? They wouldn't unless you ran into them more then once. In that case, have the gun loaded because they would think its not loaded and you would fire and they be dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Butting in: I think should have the right to carry guns. Its for safety all people. Think if it as a last resorte. Or carry one around thats not loaded. You could pull it out when you are in danger and people might think its loaded and back away' date=' run or something. A law should pass for this and thats final. Well its not final but it should be.[/quote'] But wouldn't that just alert people to the fact that your gun isn't loaded so that they can carry a knife around which works regardless of whether or not it has bullets in it? Yeah but how would they know if its loaded or not? They wouldn't unless you ran into them more then once. In that case, have the gun loaded because they would think its not loaded and you would fire and they be dead. The most obvious flaw with your logic is that the second the armed robber sees your reaching for anywhere that a gun could be held, they're going to shoot you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHawk Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 But if you have a fast draw in the guns you could get them first. Besides, why do you have ot pull a gun out on only robbers. What about a reaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Your right. When the Grim Reaper comes, I'll pull out my unloaded gun and try to scare him away. +facepalm+ And I don't care how fast you can draw a gun, pulling a trigger still takes less time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHawk Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 +thanks4facepalm+ Then all you should have to do is dodge the bullets or just keep running around till you gun is ready to fire and stop and shoot the person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 NO LET'S SEE WHAT HAPPENS: GUY TAKES OUT GUN : DON'T MOVE OR I SHOOT.YOU TAKE OUT GUN A POINT AT HIM: DON'T MOVETHE GUY SHOOTS YOU' date=' AND YOU SHOOT HIM. BOTH DEAD!!!!!!!![/quote']The odds of your reflexes being identical are next to none; one or the other would have killed the other before they could pull their trigger.Next to none is higher then noneYour second statement defeats your own argument.what statementThe necessity to use all-caps indicates overcompensation in a flawed argument.Or the fact that caps lock is on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaiBrereton Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 I believe americans have the choice to own guns for the rason of pretecting themselves and their family. Its not the victims fault the murderer has a gun. The americans havent learned though, even without guns, if guns are taken out of the sum, knives still exist, as do axes, and bricks. If a person wants something so bad, they are stricken with Envy. This builds on the desire of greed, which drives people into doing rediculous things. So not only is it the fault of the attacker, but the fault of the victim for advertising wealth (which fits into greed). Okay, yes, there are cases where many people die from unnessacary causes, like discruntled kids who hate the world, but most, its acting from the seven deadly sins. Which is a crime in the eyes of the lord. Its alot to think of, but im good at this debating. And the M version too!!! ROFLMAO!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Lovegood Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 OMG, He's cumming at me with teh brick! I will use a wooden log to defend myself *facepalm*That makes your entire statement stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supernova513 Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 You can't outlaw guns, face it. If guns are outlawed there will be no simple ways of killing someone. You may say, "well, isn't this a good thing?" The truth is, its not. I say try to look at the big picture;what will result if guns are taken away. Take a more philosophical approach to the matter. If someone is starving, and decides to rob a place or jack someone for it, they will have to use a melee weapon, which is much more difficult and takes more balls and more cruelty than to just shoot someone. if this is the moral attitude people take then what will stop its influence from spilling over into other places? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHawk Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 No, your statement was stupid and here *another facepalm**after facepalm i kick you in balls really hard* GET OUT!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xing Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 No, they should not. It helps criminals prosper. If only Police could carry guns (and other important peeps) then it'd be better. Less suicide, less homicide, less crime. 'Nuff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 @Kai: learn to freaking spell and use punctuation. Then we'll talk.@Luna: I lol'd pretty hard at the incorrect use of "cumming"@King: You fail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xing Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 @Kai: learn to freaking spell and use punctuation. Then we'll talk.@Luna: I lol'd pretty hard at the incorrect use of "cumming"@King: You fail. You fail lulz It's true. I blame communists mainly. And terrorists. And skater punks who become shoplifters.Try and remember VA Tech. The largest massacre in American history. The cause: Guns (and hereditary craziness). I mean, already, you have to have a license. Yet, people still manage to get their grubby, dirty, smelly hands on them. I mean, already, so many people are put down for gun possession. Other than hunters, police, and important people, the only other gun wielders are criminals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHawk Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 No, you fail at everything. You suck, leave me alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 Sorry Random, I meant The King, not you. But you see how easy it is for even highschooler's to get their hands on pot? How much easier would it be for a college student to get his hands on illegal firearms? (like, pistols, I'm not talking illegal as in assault rifles) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorgeismydog Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 Yes, they should. Americans have the right to bear arms for reasons, and those will always apply. Maybe stricter laws for obtaining and owning them, but yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xing Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 Sorry Random' date=' I meant The King, not you. But you see how easy it is for even highschooler's to get their hands on pot? How much easier would it be for a college student to get his hands on illegal firearms? (like, pistols, I'm not talking illegal as in assault rifles)[/quote'] Oh, srrys!!! Guns are also another way to get drugs. That = Drunken craziness = Killing = MassacreYeah, you get it. Guns rarely lead to anything good. Guns made wars!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 False. Wars made guns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xing Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 False. Wars made guns. True...... Guns are the reason for a horrible economy!!! Horrible economy comes from War, Violence, etc. Guns have killed many great leaders: Martin Luther King Jr., Abraham Lincolm, and more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 False again. War actually boosts the economy. Unless it's being fought in your country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHawk Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 Sorry Random' date=' I meant The King, not you. But you see how easy it is for even highschooler's to get their hands on pot? How much easier would it be for a college student to get his hands on illegal firearms? (like, pistols, I'm not talking illegal as in assault rifles)[/quote'] Yeah but still there should be a law so get over it jabroni. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.