Skirts Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 This is my all time favourite Dragon. I have it in my Dragon deck, but my question is.. Is it banworthy? And is it a useful card? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 It is actually banned, I can tell you as much... =/ it is useless in the casual plays just for fun that me and my friends do since those duels don't respect the "3 duels = 1 match" games... in tournaments.. it is useful, if you win the duel with this card attacking directly you win the match (the best out of 3 duels).. I personally have never played against it before in a duel where it matters.. but I guess if its banned it must be for some reason... and I guess.. yeah, its useful.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirts Posted March 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 It is actually banned' date=' I can tell you as much... =/ it is useless in the casual plays just for fun that me and my friends do since those duels don't respect the "3 duels = 1 match" games... in tournaments.. it is useful, if you win the duel with this card attacking directly you win the match (the best out of 3 duels).. I personally have never played against it before in a duel where it matters.. but I guess if its banned it must be for some reason... and I guess.. yeah, its useful..[/quote']What's the point of banning cards, if they make them? I don't understand that, I think it's stupid, because cards are getting added to the ban list alot, and all these new cards and effects that are being made are dumb. I wish they just stuck with the Duelist Kingdom, and Battle City cards and series. Made things a lot easier, and a lot more fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 It is actually banned' date=' I can tell you as much... =/ it is useless in the casual plays just for fun that me and my friends do since those duels don't respect the "3 duels = 1 match" games... in tournaments.. it is useful, if you win the duel with this card attacking directly you win the match (the best out of 3 duels).. I personally have never played against it before in a duel where it matters.. but I guess if its banned it must be for some reason... and I guess.. yeah, its useful..[/quote']It isn't useful. The only reason it's banned is because some dumbass kept on saying that he surrenders before the opponent could attack him with this, pissing off the judges, since the other player claimed that he killed him, but the guy who surrendered claimed that he surrendered the duel, thereby not getting attacked by this, thereby only losing one duel instead of a match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirts Posted March 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 It is actually banned' date=' I can tell you as much... =/ it is useless in the casual plays just for fun that me and my friends do since those duels don't respect the "3 duels = 1 match" games... in tournaments.. it is useful, if you win the duel with this card attacking directly you win the match (the best out of 3 duels).. I personally have never played against it before in a duel where it matters.. but I guess if its banned it must be for some reason... and I guess.. yeah, its useful..[/quote']It isn't useful. The only reason it's banned is because some dumbass kept on saying that he surrenders before the opponent could attack him with this, pissing off the judges, since the other player claimed that he killed him, but the guy who surrendered claimed that he surrendered the duel, thereby not getting attacked by this, thereby only losing one duel instead of a match.Well if you ask me, that is pretty dumb considering the fact that it is a game of strategy, and that you can't always win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostLetter227 Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 Why don't you just scoop the moment that it declares an attack? That way you'll lose the Duel but not the Match. This card was useless the moment it was printed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirts Posted March 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 Why don't you just scoop the moment that it declares an attack? That way you'll lose the Duel but not the Match. This card was useless the moment it was printed.I find it helpful, it has high DEF, and it has acceptable ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 Why would you run this when you can run Monarchs? They have the same ATK, and better effect(s). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 Under the rules of the OCG, which essentially make scooping Spell Speed 1 rather than Spell Speed 4, this is banworthy. No match should be decided in a single duel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirts Posted March 11, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 Under the rules of the OCG' date=' which essentially make scooping Spell Speed 1 rather than Spell Speed 4, this is banworthy. No match should be decided in a single duel.[/quote']Hmm, I still think that it's a good card that is very helpfull. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 Under the rules of the OCG' date=' which essentially make scooping Spell Speed 1 rather than Spell Speed 4, this is banworthy. No match should be decided in a single duel.[/quote']Hmm, I still think that it's a good card that is very helpfull. No, it sucks. It just happens to be banworthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Ranger Gold Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 The Card doesn't suck. It's a perfectly acceptable card. A person who has a good and well balanced deck can use this thing fine. It's not an always have in your deck card, but it's still okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 The Card doesn't suck. It's a perfectly acceptable card. A person who has a good and well balanced deck can use this thing fine. It's not an always have in your deck card' date=' but it's still okay.[/quote'] No, it sucks. And so, apparently, does YCM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Ranger Gold Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 The Card doesn't suck. It's a perfectly acceptable card. A person who has a good and well balanced deck can use this thing fine. It's not an always have in your deck card' date=' but it's still okay.[/quote'] No, it sucks. And so, apparently, does YCM. No, It's fine. And if YCM sucks than why are you still here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 The Card doesn't suck. It's a perfectly acceptable card. A person who has a good and well balanced deck can use this thing fine. It's not an always have in your deck card' date=' but it's still okay.[/quote'] No, it sucks. And so, apparently, does YCM. No, It's fine. It's a 2400 ATK three-tribute beatstick that cannot be Special Summoned, requires a specific Type of monster to be used as the Tributes, and has only one effect - an effect that is useless in the TCG and ridiculously situational and expensive even in the OCG. In short, Summoned Skull is better than this card. And that's terrible. And if YCM sucks than why are you still here? I enjoy laughing at you idiots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 There are 10 other cards with the same effect. Where is the originality? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 The Card doesn't suck. It's a perfectly acceptable card. A person who has a good and well balanced deck can use this thing fine. It's not an always have in your deck card' date=' but it's still okay.[/quote'] No, it sucks. And so, apparently, does YCM. No, It's fine. It's a 2400 ATK three-tribute beatstick that cannot be Special Summoned, requires a specific Type of monster to be used as the Tributes, and has only one effect - an effect that is useless in the TCG and ridiculously situational and expensive even in the OCG. In short, Summoned Skull is better than this card. And that's terrible. And if YCM sucks than why are you still here? I enjoy laughing at you idiots. I figured I had summed things up with the whole "Why not just run a Monarch?" thing. Apparently not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazer Yoshi Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 It's banworthy, IN TOURNAMENT PLAY.But I love the art, and I suppose it's a good collector's item. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 I believe that this is the best cahd evur. In the same way I also believe that Crab Helmet is a bad player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 I believe that this is the best cahd evur. In the same way I also believe that Crab Helmet is a bad player. There are TEN other cards with the SAME EFFECT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 I believe that this is the best cahd evur. I also think that Crab Helmet is the worst playa evur and shud kwuit.There are TEN other cards with the SAME EFFECT.Does my sarcasm really go undetected? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 I believe that this is the best cahd evur. In the same way I also believe that Crab Helmet is a bad player. There are TEN other cards with the SAME EFFECT. Those are illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 The more posts made in the TCG Section by people other than me, the better I look as a duelist. True fact. Victory Dragon is banned because it conflicted with Rulings, if you will. It's not like it's Meta-Changing or anything. There's no point in unbanning it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 The more posts made in the TCG Section by people other than me' date=' the better I look as a duelist. True fact. Victory Dragon is banned because it conflicted with Rulings, if you will. It's not like it's Meta-Changing or anything. There's no point in unbanning it.[/quote']That is exactly what I have been saying, but my suggestion as to why this piece of crap is banned seems to go on deaf ears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 Should have been illegal with hes other buddies "Come to the good side maaaannnnn" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.