Exyst Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 Epic name and pic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 Terrible card. Next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 Terrible card. ^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 Man-Thro Tro face = LOLYCM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 Man-Thro Tro face = LOLYCM Your doing it wrong.Take ANOTHER look at the face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polycarp Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 O.O I thought the title was misleading... that's the actual name of the card! XD I've never seen this before! Although it is terribad =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 Man-Thro Tro face = LOLYCM Your doing it wrong.Take ANOTHER look at the face.if its not a LOLYCM face then what is it? my second guess would be retardation. >.> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 >(except a token) Failure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 As the pic itself suggests, Ojamas are your best use for this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackwing-Master Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 i've seen this work in a deck that just kep bring cloudian smoke ball and tributing it with this. it was good, but last time i've seen it played was when Gladiator's Assault first came out. but yeh, this is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zombiepromking Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 This tells me we need a gemini that produces tokens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 This tells me we need a gemini that produces tokens. May I redirect you to my last post, good sir? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Only worth while things one this card is the pic, which isn't even good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Lolz... Even Ojamas is better without this.3000+ dmg nuke, or 2400dmg? -_- Obvious choice. I dont know. Maybe if they had a card that treated tokens as actual cards while on the field it might have a purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson General Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 How is this thread getting so many replies?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 How is this thread getting so many replies?? Because people like you post in it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson General Posted October 28, 2009 Report Share Posted October 28, 2009 How is this thread getting so many replies?? Because people like you post in it Either that or people posting clearly better alternatives everyone knows about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.