Jump to content

Official Religion Thread


Flame Dragon

Recommended Posts

Can't everyone just agree that the worst thing about religion is the people practicing it? That's usually why there are problems at all' date=' the idiots who take it too far or just plain abuse it for to their own advantage.

Prime example: the whole reason for the war in Halo was because of religion. Or so I used to think, until I realized it was actually politics disguised as religion. :shock: Whoa. Just blew your mind, didn't it?

 

Nah, just kidding, I don't expect anyone's mind to be blown by Halo (even though it [i']should[/i] happen because Halo rocks). Anyways, in a totally smooth way of changing the subject away from petty arguments, what do you think of god (or God)? As in the idea of such a being (or Being), and how you would run things if you were god?

 

Also:

Religion =/= Logic

Logic =/= Godliness

 

This whole post can be summed up by the bridge of Epica's Seif al Din:

 

[align=center]The rudiments have always been misinterpreted during history,

despite the good intentions of many disciples who's faithful belief was strong and unswayed.

Most leaders interpret the old words to their

advantage in the attempt of gaining leadership and power

over those unfortunate enough to fall under their maliciousness and manipulative ways.

This misuse of trust will forever stain the pages of history,

echoing the exploitation and the frailty of decent

men carried away by nurtured rancor... [/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 613
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Can't everyone just agree that the worst thing about religion is the people practicing it? That's usually why there are problems at all' date=' the idiots who take it too far or just plain abuse it for to their own advantage.

[/quote']

 

Oxymoron anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Faith isn't about right or wrong. Its about believing in the face of no evidence.

 

Evidence of what? I wanna hear this.

 

Whatever it is you believe in.

 

The thing "you" believe in. Must it contain physical evidence to be true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Faith isn't about right or wrong. Its about believing in the face of no evidence.

 

So why believe in something when it has no support backing it up and you admit that its possible to be incorrect?

 

That's like me believing in a green-and-pink fat unicorn in the sky who created the universe and we are all his mind-slaves who will subsequently go to hell after reproducing and serving him.

 

Sure' date=' it makes me feel better (not really), but why should I believe in it when I have no actual, decent support to go along with it and I know in my mind that this could be wrong?

 

This may just be me, but I don't like [b']believing[/b] in something, I like knowing something. Everything that is not known (or has no evidence) is simply nothing. It's something that a three-year-old can make up while drawing a picture for art class. It is devoid of meaning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Faith isn't about right or wrong. Its about believing in the face of no evidence.

 

So why believe in something when it has no support backing it up and you admit that its possible to be incorrect?

 

That's like me believing in a green-and-pink fat unicorn in the sky who created the universe and we are all his mind-slaves who will subsequently go to hell after reproducing and serving him.

 

Sure' date=' it makes me feel better (not really), but why should I believe in it when I have no actual, decent support to go along with it and I know in my mind that this could be wrong?

 

This may just be me, but I don't like [b']believing[/b] in something, I like knowing something. Everything that is not known (or has no evidence) is simply nothing. It's something that a three-year-old can make up while drawing a picture for art class. It is devoid of meaning.

 

Atheists rely on faith just as much as Christians. You can spout on about science as much as you want, but when it comes right down to it, you have no more proof than we do that God exists or does not exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can find numerous amount of loopholes involving religion in general, and they are all passed off by one of the following stupid statements:

 

1.) "You interpreted (insert religious book) wrong."

2.) "It was simply a metaphor."

3.) "The original version (not translated) said different things."

4.) "People back then didn't have as much knowledge as we do now."

 

...and by far, the stupidest one:

 

5.) "NO U"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Faith isn't about right or wrong. Its about believing in the face of no evidence.

 

So why believe in something when it has no support backing it up and you admit that its possible to be incorrect?

 

That's like me believing in a green-and-pink fat unicorn in the sky who created the universe and we are all his mind-slaves who will subsequently go to hell after reproducing and serving him.

 

Sure' date=' it makes me feel better (not really), but why should I believe in it when I have no actual, decent support to go along with it and I know in my mind that this could be wrong?

 

EDIT: Just to be clear, is this an argument/debate? And if so, what is it actually about?

 

This may just be me, but I don't like [b']believing[/b] in something, I like knowing something. Everything that is not known (or has no evidence) is simply nothing. It's something that a three-year-old can make up while drawing a picture for art class. It is devoid of meaning.

 

Atheists rely on faith just as much as Christians. You can spout on about science as much as you want, but when it comes right down to it, you have no more proof than we do that God exists or does not exist.

 

Fuc*ing exactly! You can't prove whether God (or Gods) exists or not, so why argue over it? Just do what I do; try to be a generally good person and worry about it when you die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Way to ignore my post?

 

He's been doing it for 20 pages. I've learned that arguing with literal walls isn't anything near a suitable analogy to illustrate the s*** that goes down here.

 

I'm beginning to see how this works. Then he'll ignore this thread until some noob posts something stupid, so he can sound smart again, amirite?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...