CrabHelmet Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 As usual, this topic is a trap for bad players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Send it to the Graveyard by whatever means necessary, then remove it to bring out another copy of Malicious from your Deck. Most commonly used together with a low-level Tuner such as Krebons or Plaguespreader Zombie to bring out a high-level Synchro while Tele-DAD was still functional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Send it to the Graveyard by whatever means necessary' date=' then remove it to bring out another copy of Malicious from your Deck. Most commonly used together with a low-level Tuner such as Krebons or Plaguespreader Zombie to bring out a high-level Synchro while Tele-DAD was still functional.[/quote'] Oh ho ho, aren't you a clever one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 *Attempts to put forth his reasons but is killed by the trap. While ascending to heaven, he realizes he is a Zombie and is revived* Phew, that was close... *killed by trap once again* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 *Attempts to put forth his reasons but is killed by the trap. While ascending to heaven' date=' he realizes he is a Zombie and is revived* Phew, that was close... *killed by trap once again*[/quote'] Tch, not even going to make an attempt? YCM-kun is even more pathetic than I had expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 I'm happy for him where he is. He seems to generate too much advantage for a reasonably splash-able draw engine @3 and, while effective, doesn't feel entirely broken as the one-time +1 he is @2. /fall into trap, amirite? If that didn't fall into it, I'll try again."Should be @1/0 because @2 or more it gives advantage for nothing but getting him into the Graveyard - which is broken and makes the game faster which is bad for the game... Because advantage is bad. Also, Cloudians are horribly broken because they get advantage and don't lose it through battle, which makes them an amazing archtype." Please say one of these posts fell into the trap? I can't think of any other logic to use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 2 pointless at 1, mental at 3 its effect is decent yes, but its not exactly oped, and its effect is clearly not banworthy, but being able to remove sync remove sync is terribad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docomodake Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 I don't like the way you affix "-kun" to YCM. There are female members on the site, so at least "-san" would be much more appropriate. Though, considering the tone people "worthy" of using the nickname use YCM-kun in, "-chan" would probably be the best title to affix. Also, Malicious is fine at 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 2, maybe 1, but that's pushing it. 1 is basically 0 where Malicious is concerned, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 I don't like the way you affix "-kun" to YCM. There are female members on the site' date=' so at least "-san" would be much more appropriate. Though, considering the tone people "worthy" of using the nickname use YCM-kun in, "-chan" would probably be the best title to affix.[/quote'] I only know of three female members of YCM, and all of them are too intelligent to be included in YCM-kun. At any rate, it doesn't matter if not everyone included in YCM-kun is male; the majority at least is male, and so YCM-kun can be male as their anthropomorphic combination. YCM-san is just terrible because it's far too respectful. YCM-kun is the "little boy" side of YCM's userbase - the summation of all its fools. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Goes to one. This thing is an abomination to the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docomodake Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 I don't like the way you affix "-kun" to YCM. There are female members on the site' date=' so at least "-san" would be much more appropriate. Though, considering the tone people "worthy" of using the nickname use YCM-kun in, "-chan" would probably be the best title to affix.[/quote'] I only know of three female members of YCM, and all of them are too intelligent to be included in YCM-kun. At any rate, it doesn't matter if not everyone included in YCM-kun is male; the majority at least is male, and so YCM-kun can be male as their anthropomorphic combination. YCM-san is just terrible because it's far too respectful. YCM-kun is the "little boy" side of YCM's userbase - the summation of all its fools. If one of those three you're referring to is Tea, she's a trap in case you didn't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 I don't like the way you affix "-kun" to YCM. There are female members on the site' date=' so at least "-san" would be much more appropriate. Though, considering the tone people "worthy" of using the nickname use YCM-kun in, "-chan" would probably be the best title to affix.[/quote'] I only know of three female members of YCM, and all of them are too intelligent to be included in YCM-kun. At any rate, it doesn't matter if not everyone included in YCM-kun is male; the majority at least is male, and so YCM-kun can be male as their anthropomorphic combination. YCM-san is just terrible because it's far too respectful. YCM-kun is the "little boy" side of YCM's userbase - the summation of all its fools. If one of those three you're referring to is Tea, she's a trap in case you didn't know. Two, then. Tea seems to not come here anymore anyhow, so it hardly matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 @ 3, Malicious was abusable for multiple, costless, Synchro Summons in conjunction with SSable tuners. That was grounds to kill him, I think. It's not a case of chance. The play in fundamentally different when you can perform it twice in the same turn. I'm still uncertain, however, as to whether I think he's better at 2 or at 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docomodake Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 I don't like the way you affix "-kun" to YCM. There are female members on the site' date=' so at least "-san" would be much more appropriate. Though, considering the tone people "worthy" of using the nickname use YCM-kun in, "-chan" would probably be the best title to affix.[/quote'] I only know of three female members of YCM, and all of them are too intelligent to be included in YCM-kun. At any rate, it doesn't matter if not everyone included in YCM-kun is male; the majority at least is male, and so YCM-kun can be male as their anthropomorphic combination. YCM-san is just terrible because it's far too respectful. YCM-kun is the "little boy" side of YCM's userbase - the summation of all its fools. If one of those three you're referring to is Tea, she's a trap in case you didn't know. Two, then. Tea seems to not come here anymore anyhow, so it hardly matters. Sometimes I wonder if Pika is a trap... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 owait On-topic: PUT MALICIOUS @6! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 I don't like the way you affix "-kun" to YCM. There are female members on the site' date=' so at least "-san" would be much more appropriate. Though, considering the tone people "worthy" of using the nickname use YCM-kun in, "-chan" would probably be the best title to affix.[/quote'] I only know of three female members of YCM, and all of them are too intelligent to be included in YCM-kun. At any rate, it doesn't matter if not everyone included in YCM-kun is male; the majority at least is male, and so YCM-kun can be male as their anthropomorphic combination. YCM-san is just terrible because it's far too respectful. YCM-kun is the "little boy" side of YCM's userbase - the summation of all its fools. If one of those three you're referring to is Tea, she's a trap in case you didn't know. Two, then. Tea seems to not come here anymore anyhow, so it hardly matters. Sometimes I wonder if Pika is a trap... You seem to be working awfully hard to refute your own assertion that YCM has female members. In any case, "trap" doesn't seem to be quite the correct term. "Cross player" is more accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Crab, did I fall into trap? D= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docomodake Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 I don't like the way you affix "-kun" to YCM. There are female members on the site' date=' so at least "-san" would be much more appropriate. Though, considering the tone people "worthy" of using the nickname use YCM-kun in, "-chan" would probably be the best title to affix.[/quote'] I only know of three female members of YCM, and all of them are too intelligent to be included in YCM-kun. At any rate, it doesn't matter if not everyone included in YCM-kun is male; the majority at least is male, and so YCM-kun can be male as their anthropomorphic combination. YCM-san is just terrible because it's far too respectful. YCM-kun is the "little boy" side of YCM's userbase - the summation of all its fools. If one of those three you're referring to is Tea, she's a trap in case you didn't know. Two, then. Tea seems to not come here anymore anyhow, so it hardly matters. Sometimes I wonder if Pika is a trap... You seem to be working awfully hard to refute your own assertion that YCM has female members. In any case, "trap" doesn't seem to be quite the correct term. "Cross player" is more accurate. I say a lot of things that I work awfully hard to refute. I'm a kid, get over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Crab' date=' did I fall into trap? D=[/quote'] I didn't bother to read your post, but I saw two contradictory answers and some mention of Cloudians, so probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Tribute fodder for monarchs![/sarcasm] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 [spoiler=Crab, change the 1st post to this:] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 10, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Malicious is an Effect Monster Card, not a Trap. Silly Dillo. Also, Dillo-kun, I love how you have actively avoided voicing any serious opinion, and failed to even lampshade it as Dark Armed Zombie did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinzo Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Crab-bozu (look it up) remove from play, summon another then (if in graveyard) plaguespreader Synchro summon for stardust or rda activate assault mode activate (if set) summon an assualt mode remove other malicious summon third malicious then normal summon a level two tunerSummon rda. Attack with rda then assault Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 Silly Dillo. Also' date=' Dillo-kun, I love how you have actively avoided voicing any serious opinion, and failed to even lampshade it as Dark Armed Zombie did.[/quote']But if the topic is a trap for "bad" players, why would I take it serioues? >___>Its like making a topic about Cyber Dragon. We already covered the fact how its good and abusable, and you cant really add anything to it. .......And who said I was trying to lampshade it?inb4armtendstoprefersarcasticcommentsinsteadofactualygivinganopinion] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.