Jump to content

Merged MCM -Master Card Makers & OCGC-Official Card Grammer Club

ΣДĢĪςίÅл Φƒ Đåŗķлꪪ

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Dark Mousy Newbie

Dark Mousy

Posted
Posted

I swear: Icy is probably the most stubborn person you will see.

 

[spoiler= Conversation]

Icyblue is honestly starting to tick me off.

 

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-180116.html

 

If you have anything against it' date=' please let me know.

[/quote']

 

Refer to my post. I will not have you or anyone turn something that is simply an idea, expressed through another medium into a tangible object.

 

I am not looking at the idea. Please understand proper economic terminology.

 

The product is the card, I do not care about what it is. In economics, A GOOD IS anything that brings 'UTILITY'. If you take Accounting / Business / etc. it uses different terminology. IN ECONOMICS, utility can be in any form, including joy that it brings.

 

Cards do have a 'utility' value (wouldn't you agree), and thus, if there is a market for it, which there clearly is (the section itself), it is subject to the laws of Microeconomics.

 

Card Making is supposed to be fun. Not a business or hard relations like you're doing. Just make a card, rate it the best you can and hope it dominos down.

 

PM specific people to rate in a detailed manner if it helps gain activity, and do so in a light and friendly (non-business) manner, if the low comment posts bother you; by telling people more detailed reviews are wished.

 

Simple, effective and none of that possible elitism crap you sputter from time to time.

 

You just proved your point. I don't care about feelings, I don't care about anything. This is for the sake of Analysis.

 

Then the rest of your reply means garbage to me, and frankly, the rest of Custom Cards. Whether it's Realistic Cards, Pop Culture or Any Other Cards, even Written Cards.

 

Care about the user, care about the IDEA then care about the presentation.

I will rewrite a more scientific and level of 'elitism' to your liking. Honestly though' date=' I was doing legitimate economics.

[/quote']

 

Fact: I dont care about economics or any of this... Things you're sputtering. I care about people and ideas.

 

Fact: I don't care that you don't care. This is analysis. If you want to lock analysis, prove it false first.

 

I don't have to. It materializes ideas and how users see one another. That is reason enough.

 

And that is wrong, how?

 

Because people are more than that. And always will be.

 

For god's sake. It's a model, and the model is about how users see one another. I'm trying to reflect the truth, as I've said before, the more research is done, the more accurate the model. No one said there was anything wrong with psychology either.

 

I also do not understand what your reply even means?

 

Do you understand what no means?

Ive been trying to tell you, that your method is too forward. Too blunt. And I will (and Ive been talking about it with some mods on MSN), not allow it. Period.

 

Until you decide to do something far more humane and emotionally and ideal sensitive viable. I will not allow you to post it.

 

Do you understand what 'if you would like' means?

Ive been trying to tell you, that your replies are too forward, too blunt. And I can change my style of writing, it's that you are not understanding me, and I am not understanding you.

 

Until you decide to do something far less ignorant and far more tolerant. You must understand what I am trying to do is a science, I can write it in a nicer, more 'friendly' format, BUT the bottom line is that it is a science.

 

Humans are Science. People aren't.

You're dealing with People here. Not some kind of experiment, though the ideas in the cards are. Albeit kind ones.

 

If you're SO dedicated. You MUST PM me the drafts before you post. But I cannot guarantee a sticky... In RC at least.

 

 

 

For this experiment, and it's analysis, I got a 50% warning for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Spirit of DMG Newbie

Spirit of DMG

Posted
Posted

Icyblue. He's a mod. I think a supermod, but I'm not sure. Also, I'd like to point out one thing about this:

[spoiler=Quote]

Humans are Science. People aren't.

You're dealing with People here. Not some kind of experiment, though the ideas in the cards are. Albeit kind ones.

 

If you're SO dedicated. You MUST PM me the drafts before you post. But I cannot guarantee a sticky... In RC at least.

 

Humans and People, at least I always assumed so, are the same, I hesitate to say "thing" but I lack a better word. Being? maybe...

 

EDIT: I haet when people post while I'm typing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
~ BT Newbie

~ BT

Posted
Posted

same organism

lol

Icyblue. He's a mod. I think a supermod' date=' but I'm not sure. Also, I'd like to point out one thing about this:

[spoiler=Quote']

Humans are Science. People aren't.

You're dealing with People here. Not some kind of experiment, though the ideas in the cards are. Albeit kind ones.

 

If you're SO dedicated. You MUST PM me the drafts before you post. But I cannot guarantee a sticky... In RC at least.

 

Humans and People, at least I always assumed so, are the same, I hesitate to say "thing" but I lack a better word. Being? maybe...

 

EDIT: I haet when people post while I'm typing...

 

That alwayz happens to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shadow Zero Newbie

Shadow Zero

Posted
Posted

I swear: Icy is probably the most stubborn person you will see.

 

[spoiler= Conversation]

Icyblue is honestly starting to tick me off.

 

http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-180116.html

 

If you have anything against it' date=' please let me know.

[/quote']

 

Refer to my post. I will not have you or anyone turn something that is simply an idea, expressed through another medium into a tangible object.

 

I am not looking at the idea. Please understand proper economic terminology.

 

The product is the card, I do not care about what it is. In economics, A GOOD IS anything that brings 'UTILITY'. If you take Accounting / Business / etc. it uses different terminology. IN ECONOMICS, utility can be in any form, including joy that it brings.

 

Cards do have a 'utility' value (wouldn't you agree), and thus, if there is a market for it, which there clearly is (the section itself), it is subject to the laws of Microeconomics.

 

Card Making is supposed to be fun. Not a business or hard relations like you're doing. Just make a card, rate it the best you can and hope it dominos down.

 

PM specific people to rate in a detailed manner if it helps gain activity, and do so in a light and friendly (non-business) manner, if the low comment posts bother you; by telling people more detailed reviews are wished.

 

Simple, effective and none of that possible elitism crap you sputter from time to time.

 

You just proved your point. I don't care about feelings, I don't care about anything. This is for the sake of Analysis.

 

Then the rest of your reply means garbage to me, and frankly, the rest of Custom Cards. Whether it's Realistic Cards, Pop Culture or Any Other Cards, even Written Cards.

 

Care about the user, care about the IDEA then care about the presentation.

I will rewrite a more scientific and level of 'elitism' to your liking. Honestly though' date=' I was doing legitimate economics.

[/quote']

 

Fact: I dont care about economics or any of this... Things you're sputtering. I care about people and ideas.

 

Fact: I don't care that you don't care. This is analysis. If you want to lock analysis, prove it false first.

 

I don't have to. It materializes ideas and how users see one another. That is reason enough.

 

And that is wrong, how?

 

Because people are more than that. And always will be.

 

For god's sake. It's a model, and the model is about how users see one another. I'm trying to reflect the truth, as I've said before, the more research is done, the more accurate the model. No one said there was anything wrong with psychology either.

 

I also do not understand what your reply even means?

 

Do you understand what no means?

Ive been trying to tell you, that your method is too forward. Too blunt. And I will (and Ive been talking about it with some mods on MSN), not allow it. Period.

 

Until you decide to do something far more humane and emotionally and ideal sensitive viable. I will not allow you to post it.

 

Do you understand what 'if you would like' means?

Ive been trying to tell you, that your replies are too forward, too blunt. And I can change my style of writing, it's that you are not understanding me, and I am not understanding you.

 

Until you decide to do something far less ignorant and far more tolerant. You must understand what I am trying to do is a science, I can write it in a nicer, more 'friendly' format, BUT the bottom line is that it is a science.

 

Humans are Science. People aren't.

You're dealing with People here. Not some kind of experiment, though the ideas in the cards are. Albeit kind ones.

 

If you're SO dedicated. You MUST PM me the drafts before you post. But I cannot guarantee a sticky... In RC at least.

 

 

 

For this experiment, and it's analysis, I got a 50% warning for it.

sorry to have to say this, but icyblue always tended to impress himself on me as an elitist, egotistical, arrogant, power abusive, idiotic power in existence. still, even though he has impressed himself on me as such for the most part, he does have his moments where he is quite valid. still, when a new card or video game is made, humans are used as the medium to test them out and see how successful they would be. even so, icyblue is right, card making is supposed to be fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...