Flame Dragon Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 Where should this be on a good list? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 Leave it at 3. People can figure out ways to remove pesky monsters outside of "Destruction", but destruction is the most common way. Get Rid of SD by returning it to the hand/deck or removing it from play. Destruction is just so easy to do, so its good to have something that can easily stop it as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 SDD is a fantastic example of a good but not broken card; leave it at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmallieBigs Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 D-Prison is the ultimate way to murder this. Keep it at 3. Ultra Staples are good... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daboss144 Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 Perfect at 3. About as close to the ban list as you can get without deserving to be on it. Boost it's attack 300 points and it's bannable. Most balanced card in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 0crimes to date as follows;1 being a jabroni type killer (destruction)2 revival at no cost3 generic synchro + being lv makes its incredibly easy to get out4 synchros as a whole changed the ways decks have to be built, and this is one of its biggest reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 0crimes to date as follows;1 being a b**** type killer (destruction)2 revival at no cost3 generic synchro + being lv makes its incredibly easy to get out4 synchros as a whole changed the ways decks have to be built' date=' and this is one of its biggest reasons.[/quote'] oh stop it. if any dragon were to get the BANHAMMER its JUDGEMENT DRAGON. besides Stardust is 1 of my heavy hitters and I paid good money for it. I'll be ticked if this card gets banned. its fine at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morfowt Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 if you only have 12 or less other monsters in your extra deck, put 3. you won't be penalized by putting in more anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 0crimes to date as follows;1 being a b**** type killer (destruction)2 revival at no cost3 generic synchro + being lv makes its incredibly easy to get out4 synchros as a whole changed the ways decks have to be built' date=' and this is one of its biggest reasons.[/quote'] oh stop it. if any dragon were to get the BANHAMMER its JUDGEMENT DRAGON. besides Stardust is 1 of my heavy hitters and I paid good money for it. I'll be ticked if this card gets banned. its fine at 3. your whole post contradicts itself. secondly, i find alot of the synchros broken, purely for their mechanics. i would have no problem with stardust if it could only use its effect once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 What I hate:Is how junk like this can easily run it over :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted January 26, 2010 Report Share Posted January 26, 2010 What I hate:Is how junk like this can easily run it over :/ that is actually a good card, however its outclassed by goyo, and brio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizarus Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 Should be banned for reasons I've already stated on YCM. It generates too much card advantage to be generic and left at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 Should be banned for reasons I've already stated on YCM. I generates too much card advantage to be generic and left at 3. But then Stardust Assault Mode becomes a Larvae Moth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jord200 Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 Should be banned for reasons I've already stated on YCM. I generates too much card advantage to be generic and left at 3. But then Stardust Assault Mode becomes a Larvae Moth. same with savior star dragon and stardust sin dragon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VolTama Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 Should be banned for reasons I've already stated on YCM. I generates too much card advantage to be generic and left at 3. But then Stardust Assault Mode becomes a Larvae Moth. same with savior star dragon and stardust sin dragon Savior is already like a distant cousin to it, and I'm sure most of us wouldn't mind Sin Stardust being worthless. Also, Sin Paradox would loose it's usefulness as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 Savior is already like a distant cousin to itBut running Savior Stardust is fun >___> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuffyLaxer Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 I wish I had one. This card is awesomesauce. Keep it at three. Not many people i know use more than one anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killey Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 Who runs Stardust in 3's anyways. Most people run 1-2 copies in their extra deck. Unless you are doing an assault mode deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 3. Thank you come again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 ITT: I'm the only run who runs it in 3s lawl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 Possible Limited because the 3/0 is retarded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 I'm thinking in running it at 3 if I manage to get some, even when I run D. Fissure at 3 and 1 or 2 Macrocosmos... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizarus Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 Possible Limited because the 3/0 is retarded Limiting a synchro is retarded. Broniac is not suddenly balanced just because it's at 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 Possible Limited because the 3/0 is retarded Limiting a synchro is retarded. Broniac is not suddenly balanced just because it's at 1. making OP Synchro's is retarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 making OP Synchro's is retarded.[Olbigatory post about how Konami should fire there R&D department' date= and hire someone like Crab] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.