For the sake of today, let's discuss Explosive Magician

[Flash Flyer - Sakura]

OK, I couldn't make a fitting title for this so just discuss this card:

 

 

1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner Spellcaster monsters

By removing 2 Spell Counters from your side of the field, destroy 1 Spell Card or Trap Card your opponent controls.

 

Discuss the possible uses for this card and also your input on it.

 

(Basically, you'll need to be running a deck that uses a lot of Spell Counters to get the best of this)

[Sephiroth_The_Legend]

Pros:

 

2500 ATK

6 star

Light

easily runnable in Spell Counter decks

provides S/T destruction

 

Cons:

 

Spellcaster Specific

effect isnt THAT awesome as its limited to S/T

 

Overall, not bad, but is fail compared to Arcanite or even Tempest who provides solid burn. could be run in dedicated builds and dead useful again decks that run alot of Backrow.

[-Griffin]

Overall opinion:

I'd use 1 in a Spell Counter Deck that can Synch 6s easily, but would otherwise not, since Goyo and Brio are the same level, and generic

[Flash Flyer - Sakura]

Well, the good part is that the Tuner doesn't need to be Spellcaster, but yeah it would be better if this could destroy monsters too.

 

I'd use Brio and any other good LV6 Synch over this if possible, but I suppose it's alright.

[Azuh]

Give us Kamionwizard, then we'll talk

[RyanAtlus]

Dark Magician + some bleach = This

 

Conclusion: Bleach is a lvl -1 Tuner

 

Decent Synchro for a Spellcaster Solidarity Deck. Too bad not many people run those.

[Canadian]

If it was able to put counters on itself, it'd be a better version of arcanite.

 

It deffinitly goes into the extra deck for counters still. Nice.

[Red_Gengar]

Breaker > this. Two counters without getting any himself isn't quite worth it.

[werewolfjedi]

I would never seriously play it for it's effect, breaker does a better job.

[Flash Flyer - Sakura]

I would never seriously play it for it's effect' date=' breaker does a better job.

[/quote']

 

Me too, except if I can get enough Spell Counters to use this card to its max

[BulletMan]

I would never seriously play it for it's effect' date=' breaker does a better job.

[/quote']

 

Me too, except if I can get enough Spell Counters to use this card to its max

 

TO THE MAX!!!

 

 

But really, this is a worst version of Breaker. But what if Breaker was banned again? What would be this cards Playability become?

[Kuri]

If it was able to put counters on itself' date=' it'd be a better version of arcanite.

 

It deffinitly goes into the extra deck for counters still. Nice.

[/quote']

agreed I mean most spellcaster monsters use the spell counter effect then why can't this card. Well this card is good if you know ur opponent's deck

[Sweet Lightning]

I think it's the fact that it requires a Spellcaster-Type non Tuner that makes this card less viable.

 

With six stars, I'd rather summon Goyo or Brionac.

[BehindTheMask]

Tempest Magician is better w/ Spell Counters.

[Flash Flyer - Sakura]

Between this and Tempest, the latter's better (Tempest)

[GenzoTheHarpist]

It's bad.