byak Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 I swear they were drunk when they made this.It went from god to crap, in a second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 It was once a walking FTK... Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 It was once a walking FTK... Fixed Pretty much all you can say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 This thing had potential at one time for Light Burn to be a viable deck outside of just the FTK with it found...then everyone realized how lame the actual way it was worded was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 its terrible! the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sacred Ninja Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 Want to know what the funny thing is? I still don't know how that FTK went. >__> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 Want to know what the funny thing is? I still don't know how that FTK went. >__> Fairy Archer's effect does not have a "Once per turn" clause on it, but there was a clause that said "You can only use the effect of 'Fairy Archer' once per turn". It was believed that as long as Fairy Archer's name was changed (using Hero Mask), it could use its effect as many times as it wanted per turn, because its name wasn't "Fairy Archer" anymore. At least that's how I remember it from the last topic about this card. BKSS rulings fixed that real quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 Want to know what the funny thing is? I still don't know how that FTK went. >__> Me too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 BKSS Rulings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shocked Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 Dunno what to say. Because it is japanese Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 You can inflict 400 damage to your opponent for each face-up LIGHT monster you control. If you do, this card cannot attack this turn. The effect of "Fairy Archer" can only be used once per turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 What's the deal with cards referring to themselves by name like that? Is Konami trying to rip off Magic even more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 I think it is made to avoid using effects of multiple Fairy Archers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 It was one of the most broken cards ever... for about 24 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 It was one of the most broken cards ever... for about 24 hours. I should have just had "Once per turn" so you could activate multiples of the card during the same turn, now it's just utter crap. Toilet paper anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 It was one of the most broken cards ever... for about 24 hours. I should have just had "Once per turn" so you could activate multiples of the card during the same turn' date=' now it's just utter crap. Toilet paper anyone?[/quote']Nah, its more fun to set useless yugioh cards on fire[/sarcasm] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 Want to know what the funny thing is? I still don't know how that FTK went. >__> Fairy Archer's effect does not have a "Once per turn" clause on it' date=' but there was a clause that said "You can only use the effect of 'Fairy Archer' once per turn". It was believed that as long as Fairy Archer's name was changed (using Hero Mask), it could use its effect as many times as it wanted per turn, because its name wasn't "Fairy Archer" anymore. At least that's how I remember it from the last topic about this card. BKSS rulings fixed that real quick.[/quote'] I have yet to see these rulings, and I question their validity. If its name is changed by an effect, then it would no longer recognize its name and would not apply that effect. What exactly does BKSS say to change that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 I'm still sure the arrow will be censored... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 Want to know what the funny thing is? I still don't know how that FTK went. >__> Fairy Archer's effect does not have a "Once per turn" clause on it' date=' but there was a clause that said "You can only use the effect of 'Fairy Archer' once per turn". It was believed that as long as Fairy Archer's name was changed (using Hero Mask), it could use its effect as many times as it wanted per turn, because its name wasn't "Fairy Archer" anymore. At least that's how I remember it from the last topic about this card. BKSS rulings fixed that real quick.[/quote'] I have yet to see these rulings, and I question their validity. If its name is changed by an effect, then it would no longer recognize its name and would not apply that effect. What exactly does BKSS say to change that? I'm fairly sure that said ruling says something along the lines of "The effect may only be used once per turn with the new name" or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 Also' date=' Konami issued an official ruling on the matter. So, unless the TCG screws it up (which it could), the case is closed. http://yugioh-wiki.net/index.php?cmd=read&page=%A1%D4%A5%D5%A5%A7%A5%A2%A5%EA%A1%BC%A1%A6%A5%A2%A1%BC%A5%C1%A5%E3%A1%BC%A1%D5&word=%09%20%A5%D5%A5%A7%A5%A2%A5%EA%A1%BC%A1%A6%A5%A2%A1%BC%A5%C1%A5%E3%A1%BC Second to the bottom.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 F**K. Well, then yeah, it's crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Armed_Zombie Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 Yeah, that's the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 Shame too; I had wanted to see the look on Konami's face when they realized they had created a walking FTK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.