Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Would this card have any potential these days? Discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 It could work with Senet Switch, I guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 I don't see why you'd want to use it over other generic +0s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Because this one is more fun? And so you can try to persuade your opponent to play cards all in one column... Like that would ever happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 It's a situational -1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 It's not a -1 >.<2 cards in each players' column get destroyed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archelaus Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 It's not a -1 >.<2 cards in each players' column get destroyed... It depends. Blasting Fuse + 4 Cards in the column = -1 Blasting Fuse + 3 Cards in the same column = +0 Check the math. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 I would love to know why does Cannon Soldier appears at the artwork? o.O It's not a -1 >.<2 cards in each players' column get destroyed... It depends. Blasting Fuse + 4 Cards in the column = -1 Blasting Fuse + 3 Cards in the same column = +0 Check the math. Well, Blasting Fuse occupies 1 zone... so ... how can it be BF + 4 cards in the Column? :S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecoboy1324 Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Prior to its activation its face down and thus counts as one of the 4 spaces Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scatty Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 So basically it's effect is Tribute 1 monster to destroy 1 monster and 1 spell/trap? I don't like it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 It's sorta like Icarus Attack, but situational. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 If we had tons more adjacent monster support this card would still be garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 I like the concept behind this, but its a tad too situational. But hey, at least its a +0 ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 I've always wanted to test it, but I just keep forgetting. Hopefully this thread will remind me. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Would be better as a spell... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scatty Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 I still can't understand why this card's effect is not simply: Tribute 1 monster. Destroy 1 monster and 1 Spell/Trap Card your opponent controls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 If it only destroyed the opponent's zones, and inflicted damage equal to the destroyed monster's attack, it might've been decent.But now...no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scatty Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 and inflicted damage equal to the destroyed monster's attack... Did you forget Destruction Ring is banned? Why upgrade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 and inflicted damage equal to the destroyed monster's attack... Did you forget Destruction Ring is banned? Why upgrade? Even then, it would still be situational, whereas RoD is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b0b3rt Posted April 11, 2010 Report Share Posted April 11, 2010 Guys, it's like Icarus attack but worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted April 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 I still can't understand why this card's effect is not simply: Tribute 1 monster. Destroy 1 monster and 1 Spell/Trap Card your opponent controls. because thats completely different.this can only destroy cards in the same column that it. so its worse. i remember they released some cards that could switch zones and stuff..... then as konami is, they dropped the support on its a**..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 Set this + Sangan :x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 play it on WC for laughs, since no one bothers to shift their cards and plays in that center line all day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 This + Any trap immune monster is FUNCZZNXBX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted April 12, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 finally, another way to abuse wildheart.play ojama trio and pick 3 spaces and force your opp to play in a line? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.