Was this supposed to be anti-BW? (Hunter of Black Feathers)

[Zauls]

Well it wasn't.

Discuss how anti-Meta this card is, if it is at all...

[Great Unclean One: VK]

It's a -1 one just to destroy a monster if your opponent swarms.

 

Crappy.

 

It should have a effect liek this.

 

"If your Opponent controls more then 2 monsters with the same type, discard 1 cards to destroy all monsters on your Opponent's side of the field."

[ihop]

It's a -1 one just to destroy a monster if your opponent swarms.

 

Crappy.

 

It should have a effect liek this.

 

"If your Opponent controls more then 2 monsters with the same type' date=' discard 1 cards to destroy all monsters on your Opponent's side of the field."

[/quote']

That'd be anti-machina.

 

Horrible.

[Dr. Cakey]

No, it's not supposed to be anti-Blackwing. It was released in Japan as "Darkness Hunter", but Konami realized that if they left the name unchanged that would make sense the world would end.

 

And because Konami of America (Is there a KOA?) decided to pretend it's anti-BWs, it is relegated not to the useless card pool, but to the mocked card pool, where it will never be touched until Judgment Day.

[byak]

Well hey, we all know how much Konami sucks at making anti-meta.

*cough*Koa'ki Meirus.

[Tronta]

you guys notice that it's effect isnt once per turn right? it's as long as the conditions are met. so theoretically against a blackwing swarm you could drop half the cards in your hand to 1for1 them down to 1 monster, then run it over. that's the theory anyway. and technically it isnt a -1 until it dies.

[SmallieBigs]

It's a shitty version of tribe-infecting virus.

[Flame Dragon]

It isn't that bad a card, it's just if your opponent swarms odds are your going to loss. Also this is fun with Zombie World.

 

It's a -1 one just to destroy a monster if your opponent swarms.

 

Crappy.

 

It should have a effect liek this.

 

"If your Opponent controls more then 2 monsters with the same type' date=' discard 1 cards to destroy all monsters on your Opponent's side of the field."

[/quote']

This isn't a -1. It's a 1 for 1.

 

That version is broken.

[Guest Delinquent Girl NiAtSoFi]

I'm thinking in a Beast-Warrior Solidarity build. Dumping a Beast-Warrior to activate Solidarity. It could work with Dandylion and United We Stand.

 

It's situational, but can still be sided against Solidarity, Blackwings, and Secret Village decks.

[-Griffin]

Side tech if Solid Beast-Ws are ever viable. Or any Beast-W Deck

[DARKPLANT RISING]

It should have been:

 

Destroy all "Blackwing" monsters on the field when this card is summoned. As long as this card remains face-up on the field, no "Blackwing" Monsters can be summoned. This card is not affected by "Book of Moon".

[Tronta]

^^thats what we need. balance by introducing archetype killers. sounds terrific.

[Coffee Black]

It's a shitty version of tribe-infecting virus.

 

That's the best way to put it. But if against BW, I can't help but think they have an Icarus Attack waiting. Plus, Skill Drain would screw over this type of card as well. Anyways, if I need to destroy a swarm of monsters, I'll use basic monster destruction like Smashing or Vortex.

[iAmNateXero]

I like it but there are better options.

[Manjoume Thunder]

It isn't that bad a card' date=' it's just if your opponent swarms odds are your going to loss. Also this is fun with Zombie World.

 

It's a -1 one just to destroy a monster if your opponent swarms.

 

Crappy.

 

It should have a effect liek this.

 

"If your Opponent controls more then 2 monsters with the same type, discard 1 cards to destroy all monsters on your Opponent's side of the field."

This isn't a -1. It's a 1 for 1.

 

That version is broken.

 

This < TIV

TIV < LV

LV is @3.

 

. . .

[RyanAtlus]

TIV < LV

 

Explain.

[Manjoume Thunder]

Spell card > Monster with weak stats

Destroying everything > destroying only 1 type of monsters

 

...

[TheTurtleOnceCalledGod]

This card stinks, too situational, not even a +1, wouldn't play it ever.

[Sephiroth_The_Legend]

its meant to be a new and "improved" version of Tribe Infecting Virus

 

instead.

its garbage.

[Tronta]

Spell card > Monster with weak stats

Destroying everything > destroying only 1 type of monsters

 

...

 

the potential advantage of TIV is still superior. especially since a lot of decks run only one type of monster anyway. blackwings, machina, etc. still, if TIV was limited, i don't know that it would see much use. except in my attempts to run a nonotk, consistent flip troll build. i'd definitely tech one in :P

[Manjoume Thunder]

Spell card > Monster with weak stats

Destroying everything > destroying only 1 type of monsters

 

...

 

the potential advantage of TIV is still superior. especially since a lot of decks run only one type of monster anyway. blackwings' date=' machina, etc. still, if TIV was limited, i don't know that it would see much use. except in my attempts to run a nonotk, consistent flip troll build. i'd definitely tech one in :P

[/quote']

 

TIV has 1600 ATK. It will be destroyed on the next turn.

 

X-Sabers, Flamevells, Syncrho Kat, most Gadget builds, Quickdraw, Frog Monarchs, etc run monsters with different types.

[Tronta]

1600 isnt terrible stats next to gadgets. and every monster is destroyable. assuming it will die next turn and lead to a lessened advantage is just stupid. by that logic gadgets are +0's, not +1's.