DARKPLANT RISING Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 What are they now in the meta? 2nd tier? Or 3rd?They're one of the stronger decks in locals, but I can see them falling clearly. Anyways, this cuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 they're about tier 1.5they're good, but not as good as they were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 They are bad. Definitely worse than BW, Gadgets, Glads, etc ... Tier 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 I say 1.5 due to judgement dragon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Tier 1.5 is funking stupid. What is the point of using fractions? And are you suggesting that LS are better than Glads, Gadgets and other T2 decks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Rrey Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 I actually say that they are Tier 2, i don't see them being played here because people still side against them!!Lumina at 1 clearly reduced the speed of the deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Lumina and Charge being Limited has hurt them more than anything else IMO. Nowhere near as good as they used to be but not a Deck to be taken lightly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
championduelist62 Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 they're still really good. Just not as quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Silly Bowser, Tiers are for Queers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Lightsworns were hit hard last banlist (Though nothing was put in the forbidden section). Ryko may be looking for a spot in the list for being a staple for many decks (That is in my opinion though. Konami puts any staples in the list. We all know that). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Tier 1.5 is f***ing stupid. What is the point of using fractions? And are you suggesting that LS are better than Glads' date=' Gadgets and other T2 decks?[/quote'] Glads are tier 1. >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos41 Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 I used to run Lightsworns before March.They're still a half-decent archetype, but they're nowhere near what they once were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Tier 1.5 is f***ing stupid. What is the point of using fractions? And are you suggesting that LS are better than Glads' date=' Gadgets and other T2 decks?[/quote'] Glads are tier 1. >_> I have that spot reserved for Sabers. :S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos41 Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Glad's aren't tier 1.Tier one is Infernities, Sabers and Quickdraw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Glad's aren't tier 1.Tier one is Infernities' date=' Sabers and Quickdraw.[/quote'] lolquickdraw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 i still have a problem with the fact that every lightsworn card is a better version of an already decent-to-good card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
championduelist62 Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 The only tier one decks are X-Sabers and Infernities. Tier 2 is Blackwings, Glads and Gadgets. There is no such thing as tier 1.5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Herald and Quicky are also tier 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizarus Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 The ban list killed them. JD was their trump, but Starlight Road killed him off too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos41 Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 So we should put Raigeki and Harpie's Feather duster at 1 because of Starlight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 So we should put Raigeki and Harpie's Feather duster at 1 because of Starlight? [insert Facepalm picture here][insert Your Doing It Wrong picture here][insert NO picture here]You should get the picture now.Raigeki and Feather Duster are broken, too much card advantage for no cost or situational activation. Now back to the topicLightsworns are tier 3, but Lightsworns do still have a place in hybrid decks to speed them up, like flamesworn *gets shot*Just nowadays, Lightsworns alone are too inconsistent to maintain even tier 2 status. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizarus Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 So we should put Raigeki and Harpie's Feather duster at 1 because of Starlight? Yeah, lets add more broken cards to the game because a certain card can stop them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrie Lupia Blitzer Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Lightsworns got slowed down by the banlist. I still think that JD needs to be banned, though. So we should put Raigeki and Harpie's Feather duster at 1 because of Starlight? [insert Facepalm picture here][insert Your Doing It Wrong picture here][insert NO picture here]You should get the picture now.Raigeki and Feather Duster are broken' date=' too much card advantage for no cost or situational activation. [/quote'] Are you sure that wasn't sarcasm? :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos41 Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 It was, to a degree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Lightsworns got slowed down by the banlist. I still think that JD needs to be banned' date=' though. So we should put Raigeki and Harpie's Feather duster at 1 because of Starlight? [insert Facepalm picture here][insert Your Doing It Wrong picture here][insert NO picture here]You should get the picture now.Raigeki and Feather Duster are broken' date=' too much card advantage for no cost or situational activation. [/quote'] Are you sure that wasn't sarcasm? :/ When I use the [insert "Blah" here], usually I am being at least slightly sarcastic in the post. I am guessing that the original raigeki and feather duster to 1 comment was to some degree sarcastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.